Comparing the efficacy and safety between propofol and dexmedetomidine for sedation in claustrophobic adults undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (PADAM trial)

被引:15
|
作者
Loh, Pui-San [1 ]
Ariffin, Mohd Azlan [1 ]
Rai, Vineya [1 ]
Lai, Lee-Lee [2 ]
Chan, Lucy [1 ]
Ramli, Norlisah [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaya, Dept Anesthesiol, Fac Med, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
[2] Univ Malaya, Dept Nursing Sci, Fac Med, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
[3] Univ Malaya, Dept Biomed Imaging, Res Imaging Ctr, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
关键词
Sedation; Claustrophobia; Propofol; Dexmedetomidine; Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); ANXIETY; REDUCTION; MIDAZOLAM; CHILDREN; MRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.03.074
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Study Objective: To determine the efficacy of sedation with dexmedetomidine compared to propofol for claustrophobic adults undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in our institution. Design: Randomized, prospective, double-blinded study. Setting: University-based tertiary referral center. Patients: Thirty claustrophobic adults with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II who were planned for MRI. Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to target-controlled infusion propofol or dexmedetomidine loading followed by maintenance dose for procedural sedation. Measurements and Main Results: The primary end point was adequate reduction in patient anxiety levels to allow successful completion of the MRI sequence. Both methods of sedation adequately reduced anxiety levels in visual analog scale scores and Spielberger Strait Test Anxiety Inventory (P <.001). Dexmedetomidine required a longer time to achieve anxiolysis, 7.36 minutes (SD, 2.59), and required increasing maintenance dose to induce sleep compared to 10.71 minutes (SD, 4.63) for propofol. In terms of image quality, 2 patients (16.67%) in the dexmedetomidine group were satisfactory, whereas all with propofol were graded as good to excellent. Adverse effects were seen in patients sedated with dexmedetomidine with number needed to harm 8 for hypotension and 15 for bradycardia compared to none recorded in the propofol arm. There was no significant difference in patient satisfaction scores or home readiness after the MRI. Conclusions: Both dexmedetomidine and propofol can effectively reduce anxiety levels of claustrophobic adults undergoing MRI, but dexmedetomidine takes longer to achieve adequate anxiolysis and sleep and may have an effect on image quality. Hypotension and bradycardia are common adverse effects observed with dexmedetomidine. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:216 / 222
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dexmedetomidine sedation for a claustrophobic patient with obstructive sleep apnea undergoing magnetic resonance imaging
    Richa, Freda
    Chalhoub, Viviane
    Dagher, Christine
    Yazbeck, Patricia H.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2015, 27 (08) : 698 - 699
  • [2] Clinical efficacy of dexmedetomidine versus propofol in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging: a meta-analysis
    Fang, Hongwei
    Yang, Liu
    Wang, Xiangrui
    Zhu, Hao
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2015, 8 (08): : 11881 - +
  • [3] A retrospective comparison of propofol to dexmedetomidine for pediatric magnetic resonance imaging sedation in patients with mucopolysaccharidosis type II
    Kang, RyungA
    Shin, Young Hee
    Gil, Nam-Su
    Oh, Ye Na
    Hahm, Tae Soo
    Jeong, Ji Seon
    PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2018, 28 (12) : 1116 - 1122
  • [4] Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Dexmedetomidine/Ketamine with Propofol/Fentanyl for Sedation in Colonoscopy Patients: A Double-blinded Randomized Clinical Trial
    Aminnejad, Reza
    Hormati, Ahmad
    Shafiee, Hamed
    Alemi, Faezeh
    Hormati, Maryam
    Saeidi, Mohammad
    Ahmadpour, Sajjad
    Sabouri, Seyed Mahdi
    Aghaali, Mohammad
    CNS & NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS-DRUG TARGETS, 2022, 21 (08) : 724 - 731
  • [5] A Comparison of Safety and Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine and Propofol in Children with Autism and Autism Spectrum Disorders Undergoing Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Kamal Abulebda
    Ryan Louer
    Riad Lutfi
    Sheikh Sohail Ahmed
    Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2018, 48 : 3127 - 3132
  • [6] Adverse events and sedation characteristics of propofol and dexmedetomidine during magnetic resonance imaging: An observational study in neuropsychiatric population
    Narayanan, Shyamala
    Kamath, Sriganesh
    Chakrabarti, Dhritiman
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCES IN RURAL PRACTICE, 2024, 15 (04) : 545 - 551
  • [7] Prospective, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, phase 3 clinical trial comparing the safety and efficacy of intranasal dexmedetomidine to oral midazolam as premedication for propofol sedation in pediatric patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging: the MIDEX MRI trial
    Wabelo, Olivia Nzungu
    Schmartz, Denis
    Giancursio, Mario
    De Pooter, Francoise
    Caruso, Giulia
    Fils, Jean-Francois
    Van der Linden, Philippe
    TRIALS, 2023, 24 (01)
  • [8] A Comparison of Safety and Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine and Propofol in Children with Autism and Autism Spectrum Disorders Undergoing Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Abulebda, Kamal
    Louer, Ryan
    Lutfi, Riad
    Ahmed, Sheikh Sohail
    JOURNAL OF AUTISM AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS, 2018, 48 (09) : 3127 - 3132
  • [9] Sedation in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging comparative study between dexmedetomidine and ketamine
    Eldeek, Abeer M.
    Elfawal, Sanaa Mohamed
    Allam, Mohamed Gaber
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2016, 32 (03) : 263 - 268
  • [10] Prospective, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, phase 3 clinical trial comparing the safety and efficacy of intranasal dexmedetomidine to oral midazolam as premedication for propofol sedation in pediatric patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging: the MIDEX MRI trial
    Olivia Nzungu Wabelo
    Denis Schmartz
    Mario Giancursio
    Françoise De Pooter
    Giulia Caruso
    Jean-François Fils
    Philippe Van der Linden
    Trials, 24