Determinants of compliance in a cluster randomised controlled trial on screening of breast and cervix cancer in Mumbai, India - 1. Compliance to screening

被引:31
作者
Dinshaw, Ketayun [1 ]
Mishra, Gauravi [1 ]
Shastri, Surendra [1 ]
Badwe, Rajendra [1 ]
Kerkar, Rajendra [1 ]
Ramani, Subhash [1 ]
Thakur, Meenakshi [1 ]
Uplap, Pallavi [1 ]
Kakade, Anagha [1 ]
Gupta, Subhadra [1 ]
Ganesh, Balasubramanian [1 ]
机构
[1] Tata Mem Hosp, Dept Prevent Oncol, Bombay 400012, Maharashtra, India
关键词
screening; compliance; randomised controlled trial; breast cancer; cervix cancer;
D O I
10.1159/000126497
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives: This study aims to investigate the efficacy of screening by low-cost technology in down-staging and reducing mortality due to breast and cervix cancer. Methods: The present trial is a community-based, cluster randomised controlled cohort study on screening for breast and cervix cancers (clinical breast examination and visual inspection of the cervix after application of 4% acetic acid). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses are conducted to identify the predictors of participation in screening. Results: The average compliance is 71.43 and 64.93% for breast and cervix cancer screening, respectively, with the highest compliance in round 1. At the end of 3 screening rounds, 94 and 84% of the eligible women were screened at least once for breast and cervix cancer, respectively. Younger women, women from other than Hindu and Muslim communities, school level-educated women, women belonging to lower-income families, Marathi-speaking women, married women and women who had previously consulted for any breast or gynaecological complaints had higher compliance to participation in screening. Conclusions: Good compliance rates to screening have been demonstrated in the trial, reflecting acceptance of the study by the society, which has implications while translating the trial into a programme. Copyright (C) 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 153
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
BAINES CJ, 1990, CANCER, V65, P1663, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19900401)65:7<1663::AID-CNCR2820650735>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-A
[3]  
Basset AA., 1985, SCREENING CANC
[4]   Cervical cancer screening by simple visual inspection after acetic acid [J].
Belinson, JL ;
Pretorius, RG ;
Zhang, WH ;
Wu, LY ;
Qiao, YL ;
Elson, P .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 98 (03) :441-444
[5]   The Gothenburg Breast Screening Trial [J].
Bjurstam, N ;
Björneld, L ;
Warwick, J ;
Sala, E ;
Duffy, SW ;
Nyström, L ;
Walker, N ;
Cahlin, E ;
Eriksson, O ;
Hafström, LO ;
Lingaas, H ;
Mattsson, J ;
Persson, S ;
Rudenstam, CM ;
Salander, H ;
Säve-Söderbergh, J ;
Wahlin, T .
CANCER, 2003, 97 (10) :2387-2396
[6]  
DINSHAW KA, 2002, 50 YEARS CANC CONTRO, P14
[7]  
ELWOOD JM, 1993, ONLINE J CURR CLIN T, P32
[8]  
Gaffikin L, 1999, LANCET, V353, P869
[9]   REPEAT MAMMOGRAPHY AMONG WOMEN OVER 50-YEARS-OF-AGE [J].
HOWE, HL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 1992, 8 (03) :182-185
[10]   Attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge as predictors of nonattendance in a Swedish population-based mammography screening program [J].
Lagerlund, M ;
Hedin, A ;
Sparén, P ;
Thurfjell, E ;
Lambe, M .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2000, 31 (04) :417-428