Semiautomated Renal Cortex Volumetry in Multislice Computed Tomography: Effect of Slice Thickness and Iterative Reconstruction Algorithms

被引:2
|
作者
Houbois, Christian [1 ]
Haneder, Stefan [1 ]
Merkt, Martin [1 ]
Holz, Jasmin A. [1 ]
Morelli, John [2 ]
Kiel, Alexandra [1 ]
Doerner, Jonas [1 ]
Maintz, David [1 ]
Puesken, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Cologne, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Kerpener Str 62, D-50937 Cologne, Germany
[2] St Johns Med Ctr, Tulsa, OK USA
关键词
renal cortex volumetry; split renal function; slice thickness; iterative reconstruction; multislice CT; PULMONARY NODULES; AUTOMATED VOLUMETRY; NUCLEAR-RENOGRAPHY; CT VOLUMETRY; SEGMENTATION; PREDICTION; DONORS;
D O I
10.1097/RCT.0000000000000988
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of slice thickness, iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithm, and kernel selection on measurement accuracy and interobserver variability for semiautomated renal cortex volumetry (RCV) with multislice computed tomography (CT). Methods Ten patients (62.4 +/- 17.2 years) undergoing abdominal biphasic multislice computed tomography were enrolled in this retrospective study. Computed tomography data sets were reconstructed at 1-, 2-, and 5-mm slice thickness with 2 different IR algorithms (iDose, IMRST) and 2 different kernels (IMRS and IMRR) (Philips, the Netherlands). Two readers independently performed semiautomated RCV for each reconstructed data set to calculate left kidney volume (LKV) and split renal function (SRF). Statistics were calculated using analysis of variance with Geisser-Greenhouse correction, followed by Tukey multiple comparisons post hoc test. Statistical significance was defined as P <= 0.05. Results Semiautomated RCV of 120 data sets (240 kidneys) was successfully performed by both readers. Semiautomated RCV provides comparable results for LKV and SRF with 3 different slice thicknesses, 2 different IR algorithms, and 2 different kernels. Only the 1-mm slice thickness showed significant differences for LKV between IMRR and IMRS (P = 0.02, mean difference = 4.28 bb) and IMRST versus IMRS (P = 0.02, mean difference = 4.68 cm(3)) for reader 2. Interobserver variability was low between both readers irrespective of slice thickness and reconstruction algorithm (0.82 >= P >= 0.99). Conclusions Semiautomated RCV measurements of LKV and SRF are independent of slice thickness, IR algorithm, and kernel selection. These findings suggest that comparisons between studies using different slice thicknesses and reconstruction algorithms for RCV are valid.
引用
收藏
页码:236 / 241
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] ITERATIVE ALGEBRAIC RECONSTRUCTION ALGORITHMS FOR EMISSION COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY - A UNIFIED FRAMEWORK AND ITS APPLICATION TO POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY
    XU, XL
    LIOW, JS
    STROTHER, SC
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1993, 20 (06) : 1675 - 1684
  • [42] Effect of slice thickness on image quality and the accuracy of gated computed tomography scanning for coronary calcium
    Ansari, E
    Hartnell, GG
    Shnider, RM
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 43 (05) : 336A - 336A
  • [43] Preoperative Liver Volumetry: How Does the Slice Thickness Influence the Multidetector Computed Tomography- and Magnetic Resonance-Liver Volume Measurements?
    Reiner, Caecilia S.
    Karlo, Christoph
    Petrowsky, Henrik
    Marincek, Borut
    Weishaupt, Dominik
    Frauenfelder, Thomas
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2009, 33 (03) : 390 - 397
  • [44] Reconstruction of sparse-view X-ray computed tomography using adaptive iterative algorithms
    Liu, Li
    Lin, Weikai
    Jin, Mingwu
    COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2015, 56 : 97 - 106
  • [45] Iterative reconstruction and deep learning algorithms for enabling low-dose computed tomography in midfacial trauma
    Rozema, Romke
    Kruitbosch, Herbert T.
    van Minnen, Baucke
    Dorgelo, Bart
    Kraeima, Joep
    van Ooijen, Peter M. A.
    ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY, 2021, 132 (02): : 247 - 254
  • [46] X-Ray Dose Reduction in Abdominal Computed Tomography Using Advanced Iterative Reconstruction Algorithms
    Ning, Peigang
    Zhu, Shaocheng
    Shi, Dapeng
    Guo, Ying
    Sun, Minghua
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (03):
  • [47] LOW-DOSE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY OF THE PARANASAL SINUSES: PERFORMANCE OF TWO DIFFERENT ITERATIVE RECONSTRUCTION ALGORITHMS
    Schaafs, Lars-Arne
    Pfeil, Julian
    Koehlitz, Torsten
    Hamm, Bernd
    Niehues, Stefan Markus
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2019, 183 (03) : 386 - 392
  • [48] Evaluation of Image Quality for 7 Iterative Reconstruction Algorithms in Chest Computed Tomography Imaging: A Phantom Study
    Jensen, Kristin
    Hagemo, Guro
    Tingberg, Anders
    Steinfeldt-Reisse, Claudius
    Mynarek, Georg Karl
    Rivero, Rodriguez Jezabel
    Fosse, Erik
    Martinsen, Anne Catrine
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2020, 44 (05) : 673 - 680
  • [49] Impact of slice thickness on semi-automated measurements for volume and whole-tumor attenuation of colorectal hepatic metastases in multislice computed tomography
    Rao, Sheng-Xiang
    Meng, Tao
    Zhang, Li-Jun
    Zeng, Meng-Su
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2013, 54 (08) : 863 - 868
  • [50] Effect of an iterative reconstruction quantum noise reduction technique on computed tomography radiomic features
    Foy, Joseph J.
    Shenouda, Mena
    Ramahi, Sahar
    Armato, Samuel
    Ginat, Daniel Thomas
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2020, 7 (06)