Semiautomated Renal Cortex Volumetry in Multislice Computed Tomography: Effect of Slice Thickness and Iterative Reconstruction Algorithms

被引:2
|
作者
Houbois, Christian [1 ]
Haneder, Stefan [1 ]
Merkt, Martin [1 ]
Holz, Jasmin A. [1 ]
Morelli, John [2 ]
Kiel, Alexandra [1 ]
Doerner, Jonas [1 ]
Maintz, David [1 ]
Puesken, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Cologne, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Kerpener Str 62, D-50937 Cologne, Germany
[2] St Johns Med Ctr, Tulsa, OK USA
关键词
renal cortex volumetry; split renal function; slice thickness; iterative reconstruction; multislice CT; PULMONARY NODULES; AUTOMATED VOLUMETRY; NUCLEAR-RENOGRAPHY; CT VOLUMETRY; SEGMENTATION; PREDICTION; DONORS;
D O I
10.1097/RCT.0000000000000988
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of slice thickness, iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithm, and kernel selection on measurement accuracy and interobserver variability for semiautomated renal cortex volumetry (RCV) with multislice computed tomography (CT). Methods Ten patients (62.4 +/- 17.2 years) undergoing abdominal biphasic multislice computed tomography were enrolled in this retrospective study. Computed tomography data sets were reconstructed at 1-, 2-, and 5-mm slice thickness with 2 different IR algorithms (iDose, IMRST) and 2 different kernels (IMRS and IMRR) (Philips, the Netherlands). Two readers independently performed semiautomated RCV for each reconstructed data set to calculate left kidney volume (LKV) and split renal function (SRF). Statistics were calculated using analysis of variance with Geisser-Greenhouse correction, followed by Tukey multiple comparisons post hoc test. Statistical significance was defined as P <= 0.05. Results Semiautomated RCV of 120 data sets (240 kidneys) was successfully performed by both readers. Semiautomated RCV provides comparable results for LKV and SRF with 3 different slice thicknesses, 2 different IR algorithms, and 2 different kernels. Only the 1-mm slice thickness showed significant differences for LKV between IMRR and IMRS (P = 0.02, mean difference = 4.28 bb) and IMRST versus IMRS (P = 0.02, mean difference = 4.68 cm(3)) for reader 2. Interobserver variability was low between both readers irrespective of slice thickness and reconstruction algorithm (0.82 >= P >= 0.99). Conclusions Semiautomated RCV measurements of LKV and SRF are independent of slice thickness, IR algorithm, and kernel selection. These findings suggest that comparisons between studies using different slice thicknesses and reconstruction algorithms for RCV are valid.
引用
收藏
页码:236 / 241
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Towards deep iterative-reconstruction algorithms for computed tomography (CT) applications
    Rajagopal, Abhejit
    Stier, Noah
    Dey, Joyoni
    King, Michael A.
    Chandrasekaran, Shivkumar
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2019: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2019, 10948
  • [22] Comparing five different iterative reconstruction algorithms for computed tomography in an ROC study
    Jensen, Kristin
    Martinsen, Anne Catrine T.
    Tingberg, Anders
    Aalokken, Trond Mogens
    Fosse, Erik
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2014, 24 (12) : 2989 - 3002
  • [23] Feasibility of slice width reduction for spiral cranial computed tomography using iterative image reconstruction
    Haubenreisser, Holger
    Fink, Christian
    Nance, John W., Jr.
    Sedlmair, Martin
    Schmidt, Bernhard
    Schoenberg, Stefan O.
    Henzler, Thomas
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2014, 83 (06) : 964 - 969
  • [24] Computed tomography slice thickness and its effects on three-dimensional reconstruction of anatomical structures
    Ford, Jonathan M.
    Decker, Summer J.
    JOURNAL OF FORENSIC RADIOLOGY AND IMAGING, 2016, 4 : 43 - 46
  • [25] Automated procedure for slice thickness verification of computed tomography images: Variations of slice thickness, position from iso-center, and reconstruction filter
    Lasiyah, Nani
    Anam, Choirul
    Hidayanto, Eko
    Dougherty, Geoff
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 22 (07): : 313 - 321
  • [26] Iterative Reconstruction Algorithms of Computed Tomography for the Assessment of Small Pancreatic Lesions: Phantom Study
    Choi, Jin Woo
    Lee, Jeong Min
    Yoon, Jeong-Hee
    Baek, Jee Hyun
    Han, Joon Koo
    Choi, Byung Ihn
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2013, 37 (06) : 911 - 923
  • [27] Multi-energy computed tomography using pre-reconstruction decomposition and iterative reconstruction algorithms
    Endrizzi, M.
    Nesterets, Y. I.
    Mayo, S. C.
    Trinchi, A.
    Gureyev, T. E.
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICS D-APPLIED PHYSICS, 2012, 45 (47)
  • [28] Semiautomatic Lymph Node Segmentation in Multislice Computed Tomography Impact of Slice Thickness on Segmentation Quality, Measurement Precision, and Interobserver Variability
    Buerke, Boris
    Puesken, Michael
    Beyer, Florian
    Gerss, Joachim
    Weckesser, Matthias
    Seifarth, Harald
    Heindel, Walter
    Wessling, Johannes
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2010, 45 (02) : 82 - 88
  • [29] Influence of Sinogram-Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction on Computed Tomography-Based Lung Volumetry and Quantification of Pulmonary Emphysema
    Baumueller, Stephan
    Hilty, Regina
    Thi Dan Linh Nguyen
    Weder, Walter
    Alkadhi, Hatem
    Frauenfelder, Thomas
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2016, 40 (01) : 96 - 101
  • [30] Do segmented reconstruction algorithms for cardiac multi-slice computed tomography improve image quality?
    Halliburton, SS
    Stillman, AE
    Flohr, T
    Ohnesorge, B
    Obuchowski, N
    Lieber, M
    Karim, W
    Kuzmiak, SA
    Kasper, JM
    White, RD
    HERZ, 2003, 28 (01) : 20 - +