Flexible attention system: Appearance time of split attention changes in accordance with the task difficulty level

被引:2
作者
Zu, Guangyao [1 ]
Sang, Hanbin [2 ,3 ]
Zhou, Heng [1 ]
Zhang, Fan [4 ]
Wu, Xiaogang [4 ]
Wang, Aijun [1 ]
Zhang, Ming [1 ]
机构
[1] Soochow Univ, Res Ctr Psychol & Behav Sci, Dept Psychol, Suzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Sanya, Dept Psychol, Sanya, Peoples R China
[3] Northwest Normal Univ, Sch Psychol, Lanzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Suzhou Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Psychol, Suzhou, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Split attention; Task difficulty; Spatial attention; SPATIAL ATTENTION; VISUAL-ATTENTION; TEMPORAL DYNAMICS; PERCEPTUAL LOAD; SELECTION; FOCUS; LOCATIONS; HEMIFIELDS; MODULATION; MECHANISMS;
D O I
10.3758/s13414-021-02386-y
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Although it is often assumed that spatial attention exists in the form of a unitary focus, the split-attention hypothesis proposes that attention can be simultaneously divided into two spatially noncontiguous positions and that the space in between can be ignored. However, whether split attention occurs directly based on the generation of attentional benefit or whether it requires a gradual divide from a unitary focus over time has not been clarified. In the present study, by using two spatial salient cues to direct the attention allocation of participants, we aimed to investigate whether attention requires time to divide from a unitary focus and whether the appearance time of split attention varies when the task difficulty level increases between experiments. The results showed that attention required time to divide from a unitary focus, and the position between the two cued positions was not excluded by attention when the stimulus-onset asynchrony (SOA) was 60 ms. However, as the task difficulty increased between experiments, the appearance time of split attention was earlier. These findings suggest that the appearance time of split attention has a certain flexibility and can be changed according to the task requirement, thus implying that split attention and unitary attention present some common attention mechanisms and that a split or unitary mode can be flexibly selected for an attention system.
引用
收藏
页码:2127 / 2140
页数:14
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   Independent resources for attentional tracking in the left and right visual hemifields [J].
Alvarez, GA ;
Cavanagh, P .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2005, 16 (08) :637-643
[2]   Evidence for split attentional foci [J].
Awh, E ;
Pashler, H .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2000, 26 (02) :834-846
[3]   New evidence for the zoom lens model using the RSVP technique [J].
Barriopedro, MI ;
Botella, J .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1998, 60 (08) :1406-1414
[4]   The benefit of attention is not diminished when distributed over two simultaneous cues [J].
Bay, Maxwell ;
Wyble, Brad .
ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2014, 76 (05) :1287-1297
[5]   Conceptual and methodological concerns in the theory of perceptual load [J].
Benoni, Hanna ;
Tsal, Yehoshua .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 4
[6]  
Benso F, 1998, EUR J COGN PSYCHOL, V10, P373
[7]   Visual selection mediated by location: Feature-based selection of noncontiguous locations [J].
Bichot, NP ;
Cave, KR ;
Pashler, H .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1999, 61 (03) :403-423
[8]   The psychophysics toolbox [J].
Brainard, DH .
SPATIAL VISION, 1997, 10 (04) :433-436
[9]   The Spatial Focus of Attention Is Controlled at Perceptual and Cognitive Levels [J].
Caparos, Serge ;
Linnell, Karina J. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2010, 36 (05) :1080-1107
[10]   Split Attention as Part of a Flexible Attentional System for Complex Scenes: Comment on Jans, Peters, and De Weerd (2010) [J].
Cave, Kyle R. ;
Bush, William S. ;
Taylor, Thalia G. G. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2010, 117 (02) :685-695