How people perceive different types of social media screening and their behavioral intention to pursue employment

被引:6
作者
Bowen, Chieh-Chen [1 ,2 ]
Stevenor, Brent A. [1 ]
Davidson, Sierra G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland State Univ, Dept Psychol, Cleveland, OH USA
[2] Cleveland State Univ, 2121 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44115 USA
来源
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR REPORTS | 2021年 / 3卷
关键词
Social media screening; Selection; Perceptions; Behavioral intentions; 5; PERSONALITY-TRAITS; PERSONNEL-SELECTION; PERCEPTIONS; SELF;
D O I
10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100089
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The majority of hiring companies use social media content to screen job applicants. How social media content is used in hiring decisions creates different perceptions and influences applicants' behavioral intentions to pursue employment with the company. This experimental study investigated how people responded to different types of social media screening policies. Social media policy perception (SMPP) and behavioral intention to pursue employment (BIPE) scales were developed for this study and the psychometric properties of each scale are presented. Our results indicated that participants' SMPP mediated the relation between the types of social media screening policies and BIPE. SMPP strongly influenced BIPE. The policy in which the company screens professional social media content produced the best perceptions. The policy in which the company screens professional and personal social media content produced negative perceptions. The policy in which the company requires people to disclose their social media usernames and passwords produced the worst perceptions. Requiring people to disclose their social media usernames and passwords produced low BIPE regardless of their level of agreeableness whereas screening only professional social media content produced higher BIPE for agreeable people. Theoretical and practical implications, limitations, and future directions are discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Applicant reactions to social network web use in personnel selection and assessment [J].
Aguado, David ;
Rico, Ramon ;
Rubio, Victor J. ;
Fernandez, Lucia .
JOURNAL OF WORK AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-REVISTA DE PSICOLOGIA DEL TRABAJO Y DE LAS ORGANIZACIONES, 2016, 32 (03) :183-190
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2020, STATE SOCIAL MEDIA P
[3]   Interpersonal deviance, organizational deviance, and their common correlates: A review and meta-analysis [J].
Berry, Christopher M. ;
Ones, Deniz S. ;
Sackett, Paul R. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 92 (02) :410-424
[4]  
Browne M.W., 1993, SOCIOL METHOD RES, P445
[5]   Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data? [J].
Buhrmester, Michael ;
Kwang, Tracy ;
Gosling, Samuel D. .
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2011, 6 (01) :3-5
[6]  
Costa P. T., 1992, Psychological Assessment, V4, P5, DOI [DOI 10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.5, https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.5]
[7]  
Costello AB., 2005, Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, V10, P1
[8]   Facebook fired: Legal perspectives and young adults' opinions on the use of social media in hiring and firing decisions [J].
Drouin, Michelle ;
O'Connor, Kimberly W. ;
Schmidt, Gordon B. ;
Miller, Daniel A. .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2015, 46 :123-128
[9]   Measuring attraction to organizations [J].
Highhouse, S ;
Lievens, F ;
Sinar, EF .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2003, 63 (06) :986-1001
[10]   Designing Experiments That Generalize [J].
Highhouse, Scott .
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2009, 12 (03) :554-566