Artificial intelligence and human workers interaction at team level: a conceptual assessment of the challenges and potential HRM strategies

被引:118
作者
Arslan, Ahmad [1 ]
Cooper, Cary [2 ]
Khan, Zaheer [3 ]
Golgeci, Ismail [4 ]
Ali, Imran [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oulu, Dept Mkt Management & IB, Oulu, Finland
[2] Univ Manchester, Alliance Manchester Business Sch, Manchester, Lancs, England
[3] Univ Aberdeen, Sch Business, Aberdeen, Scotland
[4] Aarhus Univ, Dept Business Dev & Technol, Herning, Denmark
[5] Cent Queensland Univ, Sch Business & Law, Cairns, Australia
关键词
Artificial intelligence; HRM strategies; e-HRM challenges; Human-robot interaction; Teamwork; JOB CHARACTERISTICS; COMPUTER ANXIETY; USER ACCEPTANCE; TECHNOLOGY; LEADERSHIP; EMPLOYEES; IMMERSION; SMART; MODEL;
D O I
10.1108/IJM-01-2021-0052
中图分类号
F24 [劳动经济];
学科分类号
020106 ; 020207 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose This paper aims to specifically focus on the challenges that human resource management (HRM) leaders and departments in contemporary organisations face due to close interaction between artificial intelligence (AI) (primarily robots) and human workers especially at the team level. It further discusses important potential strategies, which can be useful to overcome these challenges based on a conceptual review of extant research. Design/methodology/approach The current paper undertakes a conceptual work where multiple streams of literature are integrated to present a rather holistic yet critical overview of the relationship between AI (particularly robots) and HRM in contemporary organisations. Findings We highlight that interaction and collaboration between human workers and robots is visible in a range of industries and organisational functions, where both are working as team members. This gives rise to unique challenges for HRM function in contemporary organisations where they need to address workers' fear of working with AI, especially in relation to future job loss and difficult dynamics associated with building trust between human workers and AI-enabled robots as team members. Along with these, human workers' task fulfilment expectations with their AI-enabled robot colleagues need to be carefully communicated and managed by HRM staff to maintain the collaborative spirit, as well as future performance evaluations of employees. The authors found that organisational support mechanisms such as facilitating environment, training opportunities and ensuring a viable technological competence level before organising human workers in teams with robots are important. Finally, we found that one of the toughest challenges for HRM relates to performance evaluation in teams where both humans and AI (including robots) work side by side. We referred to the lack of existing frameworks to guide HRM managers in this concern and stressed the possibility of taking insights from the computer gaming literature, where performance evaluation models have been developed to analyse humans and AI interactions while keeping the context and limitations of both in view. Originality/value Our paper is one of the few studies that go beyond a rather general or functional analysis of AI in the HRM context. It specifically focusses on the teamwork dimension, where human workers and AI-powered machines (robots) work together and offer insights and suggestions for such teams' smooth functioning.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 88
页数:14
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]  
Analytica O., 2020, EMERALD EXPERT BRIEF, DOI [10.1108/OXAN-DB256373/full/html, DOI 10.1108/OXAN-DB256373/FULL/HTML]
[2]   Role of explicit and tacit knowledge in Six Sigma projects: An empirical examination of differential project success [J].
Anand, Gopesh ;
Ward, Peter T. ;
Tatikonda, Mohan V. .
JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2010, 28 (04) :303-315
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2019, FORBES
[4]  
Arslan A., 2021, The Palgrave handbook of corporate sustainability in the digital era, P613
[5]   Multi-stakeholder perspectives on information communication technology training for older adults: implications for teaching and learning [J].
Arthanat, Sajay ;
Vroman, Kerryellen G. ;
Lysack, Catherine ;
Grizzetti, Joseph .
DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION-ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 14 (05) :453-461
[6]   E-leadership: Re-examining transformations in leadership source and transmission [J].
Avolio, Bruce J. ;
Sosik, John J. ;
Kahai, Surinder S. ;
Baker, Bradford .
LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 2014, 25 (01) :105-131
[7]   Breaking Out of the Bubble Putting Simulation Into Context to Increase Immersion and Performance [J].
Backlund, Per ;
Soderholm, Hanna Maurin ;
Engstrom, Henrik ;
Hagiwara, Magnus Andersson ;
Lebram, Mikael .
SIMULATION & GAMING, 2018, 49 (06) :642-660
[8]   The dark side of information: overload, anxiety and other paradoxes and pathologies [J].
Bawden, David ;
Robinson, Lyn .
JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2009, 35 (02) :180-191
[9]   Socio-Technical Perspectives on Smart Working: Creating Meaningful and Sustainable Systems [J].
Bednar, Peter M. ;
Welch, Christine .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS FRONTIERS, 2020, 22 (02) :281-298
[10]   Perceived trust in artificial intelligence technologies: A preliminary study [J].
Bitkina, Olga Vl. ;
Jeong, Heejin ;
Lee, Byung Cheol ;
Park, Jangwoon ;
Park, Jaehyun ;
Kim, Hyun K. .
HUMAN FACTORS AND ERGONOMICS IN MANUFACTURING & SERVICE INDUSTRIES, 2020, 30 (04) :282-290