A Preliminary Study of Quantitative Ultrasound for Cancer-Risk Assessment of Thyroid Nodules

被引:13
作者
Goundan, Poorani N. [1 ]
Mamou, Jonathan [2 ]
Rohrbach, Daniel [3 ]
Smith, Jason [4 ]
Patel, Harshal [1 ]
Wallace, Kirk D. [5 ]
Feleppa, Ernest J. [2 ]
Lee, Stephanie L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Sch Med, Boston Med Ctr, Sect Endocrinol Diabet & Nutr, Boston, MA 02118 USA
[2] Riverside Res, Lizzi Ctr Biomed Engn, New York, NY USA
[3] Verasonics Inc, Kirkland, WA USA
[4] Rensselaer Polytech Inst, Dept Biomed Engn, Troy, NY 12180 USA
[5] Gen Elect Res, Niskayuna, NY USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
thyroid neoplasm; thyroid nodule; thyroid cancer; thyroid biopsy; quantitative ultrasound;
D O I
10.3389/fendo.2021.627698
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Gray-scale, B-mode ultrasound (US) imaging is part of the standard clinical procedure for evaluating thyroid nodules (TNs). It is limited by its instrument- and operator-dependence and inter-observer variability. In addition, the accepted high-risk B-mode US TN features are more specific for detecting classic papillary thyroid cancer rather than the follicular variant of papillary thyroid cancer or follicular thyroid cancer. Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) is a technique that can non-invasively assess properties of tissue microarchitecture by exploiting information contained in raw ultrasonic radiofrequency (RF) echo signals that is discarded in conventional B-mode imaging. QUS provides quantitative parameter-value estimates that are a function of the properties of US scatterers and microarchitecture of the tissue. The purpose of this preliminary study was to assess the performance of QUS parameters in evaluating benign and malignant thyroid nodules. Methods Patients from the Thyroid Health Center at the Boston Medical Center were recruited to participate. B-mode and RF data were acquired and analyzed in 225 TNs (24 malignant and 201 benign) from 208 patients. These data were acquired either before (167 nodules) or after (58 nodules) subjects underwent fine-needle biopsy (FNB). The performance of a combination of QUS parameters (CQP) was assessed and compared with the performance of B-mode risk-stratification systems. Results CQP produced an ROC AUC value of 0.857 +/- 0.033 compared to a value of 0.887 +/- 0.033 (p=0.327) for the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging, Reporting and Data System (ACR TI-RADS) and 0.880 +/- 0.041 (p=0.367) for the American Thyroid Association (ATA) risk-stratification system. Furthermore, using a CQP threshold of 0.263 would further reduce the number of unnecessary FNBs in 44% of TNs without missing any malignant TNs. When CQP used in combination with ACR TI-RADS, a potential additional reduction of 49 to 66% in unnecessary FNBs was demonstrated. Conclusion This preliminary study suggests that QUS may provide a method to classify TNs when used by itself or when combined with a conventional gray-scale US risk-stratification system and can potentially reduce the need to biopsy TNs.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   DIRECT COMPARISON OF THE ATA AND TI-RADS ULTRASOUND SCORING SYSTEMS [J].
Ahmadi, Sara ;
Oyekunle, Taofik ;
Jiang, Xiaoyin 'Sara' ;
Scheri, Randall ;
Perkins, Jennifer ;
Stang, Michael ;
Roman, Sanziana ;
Sosa, Julie A. .
ENDOCRINE PRACTICE, 2019, 25 (05) :413-422
[2]   THYROID-GLAND - ULTRASOUND SCREENING IN A RANDOM ADULT-POPULATION [J].
BRANDER, A ;
VIIKINKOSKI, P ;
NICKELS, J ;
KIVISAARI, L .
RADIOLOGY, 1991, 181 (03) :683-687
[3]   Interobserver variation for ultrasound determination of thyroid nodule volumes [J].
Brauer, VFH ;
Eder, P ;
Miehle, K ;
Wiesner, TD ;
Hasenclever, H ;
Paschke, R .
THYROID, 2005, 15 (10) :1169-1175
[4]   DIAGNOSTIC SPECTRUM ANALYSIS IN OPHTHALMOLOGY - A PHYSICAL PERSPECTIVE [J].
FELEPPA, EJ ;
LIZZI, FL ;
COLEMAN, DJ ;
YAREMKO, MM .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1986, 12 (08) :623-631
[5]   Quantitative Ultrasound in Cancer Imaging [J].
Feleppa, Ernest J. ;
Mamou, Jonathan ;
Porter, Christopher R. ;
Machi, Junji .
SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY, 2011, 38 (01) :136-150
[6]   AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGISTS, AMERICAN COLLEGE OF ENDOCRINOLOGY, AND ASSOCIAZIONE MEDICI ENDOCRINOLOGI MEDICAL GUIDELINES FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE FOR THE DIAGNOSIS AND MANAGEMENT OF THYROID NODULES-2016 UPDATE [J].
Gharib, Hossein ;
Papini, Enrico ;
Garber, Jeffrey R. ;
Duick, Daniel S. ;
Harrell, R. Mack ;
Hegedus, Laszlo ;
Paschke, Ralf ;
Valcavi, Roberto ;
Vitti, Paolo .
ENDOCRINE PRACTICE, 2016, 22 :1-60
[7]   Interobserver agreement of various thyroid imaging reporting and data systems [J].
Grani, Giorgio ;
Lamartina, Livia ;
Cantisani, Vito ;
Maranghi, Marianna ;
Lucia, Piernatale ;
Durante, Cosimo .
ENDOCRINE CONNECTIONS, 2018, 7 (01) :1-7
[8]   2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer The American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer [J].
Haugen, Bryan R. ;
Alexander, Erik K. ;
Bible, Keith C. ;
Doherty, Gerard M. ;
Mandel, Susan J. ;
Nikiforov, Yuri E. ;
Pacini, Furio ;
Randolph, Gregory W. ;
Sawka, Anna M. ;
Schlumberger, Martin ;
Schuff, Kathryn G. ;
Sherman, Steven I. ;
Sosa, Julie Ann ;
Steward, David L. ;
Tuttle, R. Michael ;
Wartofsky, Leonard .
THYROID, 2016, 26 (01) :1-133
[9]   Interobserver Variability of Sonographic Features Used in the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System [J].
Hoang, Jenny K. ;
Middleton, William D. ;
Farjat, Alfredo E. ;
Teefey, Sharlene A. ;
Abinanti, Nicole ;
Boschini, Fernando J. ;
Bronner, Abraham J. ;
Dahiya, Nirvikar ;
Hertzberg, Barbara S. ;
Newman, Justin R. ;
Scanga, Daniel ;
Vogler, Robert C. ;
Tessler, Franklin N. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2018, 211 (01) :162-167
[10]   CLINICAL STUDY OF THE PREDICTION OF MALIGNANCY IN THYROID NODULES: MODIFIED SCORE VERSUS 2017 AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY'S THYROID IMAGING REPORTING AND DATA SYSTEM ULTRASOUND LEXICON [J].
Jin, Zhan-Qiang ;
Yu, Hong-Zhen ;
Mo, Chun-Jian ;
Su, Rong-Qing .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2019, 45 (07) :1627-1637