Main morbidities recorded in the women's international study of long duration oestrogen after menopause (WISDOM): a randomised controlled trial of hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women

被引:170
作者
Vickers, Madge R.
MacLennan, Alastair H. [1 ]
Lawton, Beverley
Ford, Deborah
Martin, Jeannett
Meredith, Sarah K.
DeStavola, Bianca L.
Rose, Sally
Dowell, Anthony
Wikes, Helen C.
Darbyshire, Janet H.
Meade, Tom W.
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Womens & Childrens Hosp, Adelaide, SA 5006, Australia
[2] MRC Gen Practice Res, London NW1 2ND, England
[3] Wellington Sch Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Primary Hlth Care & Gen Practice, Wellington, New Zealand
[4] MRC Clin Trials Unit, London NW1 2DA, England
[5] Univ London London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Dept Epidemiol & Populat Hlth, London WC1E 7HT, England
来源
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2007年 / 335卷 / 7613期
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1136/bmj.39266.425069.AD
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To assess the long term risks and benefits of hormone replacement therapy (combined hormone therapy versus placebo, and oestrogen alone versus combined hormone therapy). Design Multicentre, randomised, placebo controlled, double blind trial. Setting General practices in UK (384), Australia (91), and New Zealand (24). Participants Postmenopausal women aged 50-69 years at randomisation. At early closure of the trial, 56 583 had been screened, 8980 entered run-in, and 5692 (26% of target of 22 300) started treatment. Interventions Oestrogen only therapy (conjugated equine oestrogens 0.625 ring orally daily) or combined hormone therapy (conjugated equine oestrogens plus medroxyprogesterone acetate 2.5/5-0 ring orally daily). Ten years of treatment planned. Main outcome measures Primary outcomes: major cardiovascular disease, osteoporotic fractures, and breast cancer. Secondary outcomes: other cancers, death from all causes, venous thromboembolism, cerebrovascular disease, dementia, and quality of life. Results The trial was prematurely closed during recruitment, after a median follow-up of 11.9 months (interquartile range 7.1-19.6, total 6498 women years) in those enrolled, after the publication of early results from the women's health initiative study. The mean age of randomised women was 62.8 (SID 4.8) years. When combined hormone therapy (n=2196) was compared with placebo (n=2189), there was a significant increase in the number of major cardiovascular events (7 v 0, P=0.016) and venous thromboembolisms (22 v 3, hazard ratio 7.36 (95% CI 2.20 to 24.60)). There were no statistically significant differences in numbers of breast or other cancers (22 v 25, hazard ratio 0.88 (0.49 to 1.56)), cerebrovascular events (14 v 19, 0.73 (0.37 to 1.46)), fractures (40 v 58, 0.69 (0.46 to 1.03)), and overall deaths (8 v 5, 1.60 (0.52 to 4.89)). Comparison of combined hormone therapy (n=815) versus oestrogen therapy (n=826) outcomes revealed no significant differences. Conclusions Hormone replacement therapy increases cardiovascular and thromboembolic risk when started many years after the menopause. The results are consistent with the findings of the women's health initiative study and secondary prevention studies. Research is needed to assess the long term risks and benefits of starting hormone replacement therapy near the menopause, when the effect may be different.
引用
收藏
页码:239 / +
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Effects of conjugated, equine estrogen in postmenopausal women with hysterectomy - The women's health initiative randomized controlled trial
    Anderson, GL
    Limacher, M
    Assaf, AR
    Bassford, T
    Beresford, SAA
    Black, H
    Bonds, D
    Brunner, R
    Brzyski, R
    Caan, B
    Chlebowski, R
    Curb, D
    Gass, M
    Hays, J
    Heiss, G
    Hendrix, S
    Howard, BV
    Hsia, J
    Hubbell, A
    Jackson, R
    Johnson, KC
    Judd, H
    Kotchen, JM
    Kuller, L
    LaCroix, AZ
    Lane, D
    Langer, RD
    Lasser, N
    Lewis, CE
    Manson, J
    Margolis, K
    Ockene, J
    O'Sullivan, MJ
    Phillips, L
    Prentice, RL
    Ritenbaugh, C
    Robbins, J
    Rossouw, JE
    Sarto, G
    Stefanick, ML
    Van Horn, L
    Wactawski-Wende, J
    Wallace, R
    Wassertheil-Smoller, S
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 291 (14): : 1701 - 1712
  • [2] Bajekal M, HLTH SURVEY ENGLAND
  • [3] Cherry N, 2002, LANCET, V360, P2001
  • [4] A study of hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women with ischaemic heart disease: the Papworth HRT Atherosclerosis Study
    Clarke, SC
    Kelleher, J
    Lloyd-Jones, H
    Slack, M
    Schofield, PM
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2002, 109 (09) : 1056 - 1062
  • [5] Controversies about HRT - lessons from monkey models
    Clarkson, TB
    Appt, SE
    [J]. MATURITAS, 2005, 51 (01) : 64 - 74
  • [6] Collett D, 2014, MODELLING SURVIVAL D
  • [7] Estrogen plus progestin and risk of venous thrombosis
    Cushman, M
    Kuller, LH
    Prentice, R
    Rodabough, RJ
    Psaty, BM
    Stafford, RS
    Sidney, S
    Rosendaal, FR
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 292 (13): : 1573 - 1580
  • [8] Hormone therapy and coronary heart disease: The role of time since menopause and age at hormone initiation
    Grodstein, F
    Manson, JE
    Stampfer, MJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2006, 15 (01) : 35 - 44
  • [9] Hoibraaten E, 2000, THROMB HAEMOSTASIS, V84, P961
  • [10] HABITS (hormonal replacement therapy after breast cancer - is it safe?), a randomised comparison: trial stopped
    Holmberg, L
    Anderson, H
    [J]. LANCET, 2004, 363 (9407) : 453 - 455