The Puzzle of Agricultural Exceptionalism in International Trade Policy

被引:17
作者
Trebilcock, Michael [1 ]
Pue, Kristen [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Law & Econ, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Polit Sci, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
关键词
WTO;
D O I
10.1093/jiel/jgv022
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
This article first seeks to demonstrate the exceptional levels of protectionism accorded to the agricultural sector, especially in many developed countries. It reviews the principal protectionist measures employed: domestic subsidies and price supports, production restrictions, and border measures; describes briefly the disciplines applicable to these measures under World Trade Organization law; and then surveys empirical evidence on the extent of protectionism that prevails in the agricultural sector in many countries. Next, it evaluates the principal normative justifications often offered for exceptional levels of agricultural protectionism: ensuring access to affordable food; ensuring a livable income for farmers; and preserving traditional rural lifestyles and communities. It finds that these are not especially compelling either relative to many other economic sectors or in terms of first-best policy responses to the normative concerns in question. The article then considers political economy explanations for exceptional levels of protectionism in agriculture-including Public Choice explanations and the transitional gains trap-which, while providing some purchase on the phenomenon, are again not completely compelling. The article concludes with some observations on how liberalization of trade in agricultural products might be advanced in the future.
引用
收藏
页码:233 / 260
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Can the WTO reduce agricultural trade distortions? [J].
Anderson, Kym .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, 2010, 19 (01) :109-134
[32]   Agricultural Trade: What Matters in the Doha Round? [J].
Laborde, David ;
Martin, Will .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF RESOURCE ECONOMICS, VOL 4, 2012, 4 :264-285
[34]   Agriculture after a year with COVID-19: Any long-term implications for international trade policy? [J].
Kerr, William A. .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D AGROECONOMIE, 2021, 69 (02) :261-267
[35]   Trade Treaties and Alcohol Advertising Policy [J].
Ellen Gould .
Journal of Public Health Policy, 2005, 26 :359-376
[36]   Trade policy substitution: theory and evidence [J].
Beverelli, Cosimo ;
Boffa, Mauro ;
Keck, Alexander .
REVIEW OF WORLD ECONOMICS, 2019, 155 (04) :755-783
[37]   Trade policy substitution: theory and evidence [J].
Cosimo Beverelli ;
Mauro Boffa ;
Alexander Keck .
Review of World Economics, 2019, 155 :755-783
[38]   Trade treaties and alcohol advertising policy [J].
Gould, E .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH POLICY, 2005, 26 (03) :359-376
[39]   India and China The Trade Policy Dynamics [J].
Bhat, T. P. .
INDIA QUARTERLY-A JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS, 2012, 68 (01) :69-87
[40]   REGULATORY SPACE IN INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW AND INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT LAW [J].
Wagner, Markus .
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, 2014, 36 (01) :1-87