Winners or losers? Democracies in international crisis, 1918-94

被引:127
作者
Gelpi, CF
Griesdorf, M
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Littauer Ctr, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1017/S0003055401003148
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
We attempt to explain when and why democratic states will prevail in international crises. We review several of the prominent theories about democratic political structures and derive hypotheses from each framework about crisis outcomes. These hypotheses are tested against the population of 422 international crises between 1918 and 1994. Our findings provide further evidence that the democratic peace is not a spurious result of common interests. Moreover, we also begin the difficult task of differentiating among the many theories of the democratic peace. In particular, we find strong evidence that democratic political structures are important because of their ability to generate domestic audience costs. Our findings also support the argument that democratic political structures encourage leaders to select international conflicts that they will win.
引用
收藏
页码:633 / 647
页数:15
相关论文
共 56 条
[51]   THE INSIGNIFICANCE OF THE LIBERAL PEACE [J].
SPIRO, DE .
INTERNATIONAL SECURITY, 1994, 19 (02) :50-86
[52]  
Stam AllanC., 1996, WIN LOSE DRAW DOMEST
[53]   Bewitched, bothered, and bewildered - A reply to Farber and Gowa and to Mansfield and Snyder [J].
Thompson, WR ;
Tucker, R .
JOURNAL OF CONFLICT RESOLUTION, 1997, 41 (03) :462-477
[54]   A tale of two democratic peace critiques [J].
Thompson, WR ;
Tucker, R .
JOURNAL OF CONFLICT RESOLUTION, 1997, 41 (03) :428-454
[55]  
Waltz K.N, 1979, Theory of International Politics
[56]   SOME SIMPLE CALCULATIONS ON DEMOCRACY AND WAR INVOLVEMENT [J].
WEEDE, E .
JOURNAL OF PEACE RESEARCH, 1992, 29 (04) :377-383