Winners or losers? Democracies in international crisis, 1918-94

被引:127
作者
Gelpi, CF
Griesdorf, M
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Littauer Ctr, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1017/S0003055401003148
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
We attempt to explain when and why democratic states will prevail in international crises. We review several of the prominent theories about democratic political structures and derive hypotheses from each framework about crisis outcomes. These hypotheses are tested against the population of 422 international crises between 1918 and 1994. Our findings provide further evidence that the democratic peace is not a spurious result of common interests. Moreover, we also begin the difficult task of differentiating among the many theories of the democratic peace. In particular, we find strong evidence that democratic political structures are important because of their ability to generate domestic audience costs. Our findings also support the argument that democratic political structures encourage leaders to select international conflicts that they will win.
引用
收藏
页码:633 / 647
页数:15
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
Achen ChristopherH., 1986, STAT ANAL QUASIEXPER
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1981, The War Trap
[3]  
Arkin W., 1985, NUCL BATTLEFIELDS
[4]   EUGene:: A conceptual manual [J].
Bennett, DS ;
Stam, AC .
INTERNATIONAL INTERACTIONS, 2000, 26 (02) :179-204
[5]  
Betts RichardK., 1987, Nuclear Blackmail and Nuclear Balance Washington
[6]  
Brecher Michael., 1997, STUDY CRISIS
[7]   DANGEROUS DYADS - CONDITIONS AFFECTING THE LIKELIHOOD OF INTERSTATE WAR, 1816-1965 [J].
BREMER, SA .
JOURNAL OF CONFLICT RESOLUTION, 1992, 36 (02) :309-341
[8]  
Campbell DT., 1963, Handbook of Research on Teaching, P171
[10]   WAR AND THE SURVIVAL OF POLITICAL LEADERS - A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF REGIME TYPES AND POLITICAL ACCOUNTABILITY [J].
DEMESQUITA, BB ;
SIVERSON, RM .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1995, 89 (04) :841-855