Surgeon's preferences for the operative treatment of fractures of the tibial shaft - An international survey

被引:78
作者
Bhandari, M
Guyatt, GH
Swiontkowski, MF
Tornetta, P
Hanson, B
Weaver, B
Sprague, S
Schemitsch, EH
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada
[2] Univ Minnesota, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[3] Boston Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Boston, MA 02118 USA
[4] Univ Washington, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Hlth Sci Ctr, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[5] Univ Toronto, St Michaels Hosp, Dept Surg, Div Orthopaed Surg, Toronto, ON M5C 1R6, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.2106/00004623-200111000-00020
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
There are more potential treatments for tibial fractures and more potential complications of those treatments than there are for any other type of fracture. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons recently reviewed malpractice claims to identify the procedures and diagnoses that have most commonly resulted in legal action. Among all orthopaedic conditions, fractures of the tibia and fibula ranked second with regard to the total number of patient malpractice claims, accounting for over thirty million dollars in indemnity. The National Center for Health Statistics reported that more than 490,000 fractures of the tibia and fibula occur each year in the United States. Although many tibial fractures may be managed nonoperatively, fractures for which nonoperative treatment has failed, open fractures, fractures with an associated compartment syndrome, and high-energy fractures require operative stabilization. Surgical options include external fixation, plate fixation, and intramedullary nailing with or without reaming. Although there is a consensus among orthopaedic surgeons with regard to the optimal treatment of fractures of the femoral shaft, the appropriate treatment of closed and open tibial fractures remains controversial.
引用
收藏
页码:1746 / 1752
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Current state of office laparoscopic surgery [J].
Almeida, OD .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF GYNECOLOGIC LAPAROSCOPISTS, 2000, 7 (04) :545-546
[2]  
Armstrong D, 2000, BRIT J GEN PRACT, V50, P479
[3]   Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals [J].
Asch, DA ;
Jedrziewski, MK ;
Christakis, NA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1997, 50 (10) :1129-1136
[4]  
BACH AW, 1989, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P89
[5]   Treatment of open fractures of the shaft of the tibia - A systematic overview and meta-analysis [J].
Bhandari, M ;
Guyatt, GH ;
Swiontkowski, MF ;
Schemitsch, EH .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2001, 83B (01) :62-68
[6]   Reamed versus nonreamed intramedullary nailing of lower extremity long bone fractures: A systematic overview and meta-analysis [J].
Bhandari, M ;
Guyatt, GH ;
Tong, D ;
Adili, A ;
Shaughnessy, SG .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2000, 14 (01) :2-9
[7]   134 TIBIAL SHAFT FRACTURES MANAGED WITH THE DYNAMIC AXIAL FIXATOR [J].
CHECKETTS, RG ;
MORAN, CG ;
JENNINGS, AG .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1995, 66 (03) :271-274
[8]  
Coles CP, 2000, CAN J SURG, V43, P256
[9]   TREATMENT OF CLOSED TIBIAL SHAFT FRACTURES WITH UNILATERAL EXTERNAL FIXATION [J].
EMAMI, A ;
MJOBERG, B ;
KARLSTROM, G ;
LARSSON, S .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 1995, 26 (05) :299-303
[10]  
Feinstein A., 1987, CLINIMETRICS, P141, DOI DOI 10.2307/J.CTT1XP3VBC.13