INEQUALITY OF OPPORTUNITY IN EARNINGS AND CONSUMPTION EXPENDITURE: THE CASE OF INDIAN MEN

被引:48
作者
Singh, Ashish [1 ]
机构
[1] Indira Gandhi Inst Dev Res, Bombay 400065, Maharashtra, India
关键词
D31; D63; J62; inequality of opportunity; earnings inequality; consumption expenditure inequality; India; EDUCATION; INCOME; EQUALITY; PARENT;
D O I
10.1111/j.1475-4991.2011.00485.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The paper associates inequality of opportunities with outcome differences that can be accounted by predetermined circumstances which lie beyond the control of an individual, such as parental education, parental occupation, caste, religion, and place of birth. The non-parametric estimates using parental education as a measure of circumstances reveal that the opportunity share of earnings inequality in 200405 was 1119 percent for urban India and 58 percent for rural India. The same figures for consumption expenditure inequality are 1019 percent for urban India and 59 percent for rural India. The overall opportunity share estimates (parametric) of earnings inequality due to circumstances, including caste, religion, region, parental education, and parental occupation, vary from 18 to 26 percent for urban India, and from 16 to 21 percent for rural India. The overall opportunity share estimates for consumption expenditure inequality are close to the earnings inequality figures for both urban and rural areas. The analysis further finds evidence that the parental education specific opportunity share of overall earnings (and consumption expenditure) inequality is largest in urban India, but caste and geographical region also play an equally important role when rural India is considered.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 106
页数:28
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
Ali I, 2007, EC RES DEP SERIES
[2]  
Anitha B.K., 2000, VILLAGES CASTE ED
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1979, TANNER LECT HUMAN VA
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Social, Economic and Educational Status of the Muslim Community of India
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Fairness, Responsibility and Welfare
[6]  
[Anonymous], DEMOGRAPHIC DIVERSIT
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2009, MEASURING INEQUALITY
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2008, 4659 WORLD BANK
[9]   EQUALITY AND EQUAL-OPPORTUNITY FOR WELFARE [J].
ARNESON, RJ .
PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES, 1989, 56 (01) :77-93
[10]  
BEHRMAN J, 1976, AM ECON REV, V66, P436