Distractors that signal reward attract the eyes

被引:38
作者
Bucker, Berno [1 ]
Belopolsky, Artem V. [1 ]
Theeuwes, Jan [1 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Cognit Psychol, NL-1081 BT Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Eye movements; Priming; Global effect; Reward; Attention; TOP-DOWN CONTROL; STIMULUS-DRIVEN; SALIENCE; CAPTURE;
D O I
10.1080/13506285.2014.980483
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Salient stimuli and stimuli associated with reward have the ability to attract both attention and the eyes. The current study exploited the effects of reward on the well-known global effect in which two objects appear simultaneously in close spatial proximity. Participants always made saccades to a predefined target, while the colour of a nearby distractor signalled the reward available (high/low) for that trial. Unlike previous reward studies, in the current study these distractors never served as targets. We show that participants made fast saccades towards the target. However, saccades landed significantly closer to the high compared to the low reward signalling distractor. This reward effect was already present in the first block and remained stable throughout the experiment. Instead of landing exactly in between the two stimuli (i.e., the classic global effect), the fastest eye movements landed closer towards the reward signalling distractor. Results of a control experiment, in which no distractor-reward contingencies were present, confirmed that the observed effects were driven by reward and not by physical salience. Furthermore, there were trial-by-trial reward priming effects in which saccades landed significantly closer to the high instead of the low reward signalling distractor when the same distractor was presented on two consecutive trials. Together the results imply that a reward signalling stimulus that was never part of the task set has an automatic effect on the oculomotor system.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 24
页数:24
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] A value-driven mechanism of attentional selection
    Anderson, Brian A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VISION, 2013, 13 (03):
  • [2] Dissociating location-specific inhibition and attention shifts: Evidence against the disengagement account of contingent capture
    Anderson, Brian A.
    Folk, Charles L.
    [J]. ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2012, 74 (06) : 1183 - 1198
  • [3] Learned Value Magnifies Salience-Based Attentional Capture
    Anderson, Brian A.
    Laurent, Patryk A.
    Yantis, Steven
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (11):
  • [4] Value-driven attentional capture
    Anderson, Brian A.
    Laurent, Patryk A.
    Yantis, Steven
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2011, 108 (25) : 10367 - 10371
  • [5] Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy
    Awh, Edward
    Belopolsky, Artem V.
    Theeuwes, Jan
    [J]. TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2012, 16 (08) : 437 - 443
  • [6] The effect of reward on orienting and reorienting in exogenous cuing
    Bucker, Berno
    Theeuwes, Jan
    [J]. COGNITIVE AFFECTIVE & BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 14 (02) : 635 - 646
  • [7] Rewards teach visual selective attention
    Chelazzi, Leonardo
    Perlato, Andrea
    Santandrea, Elisa
    Della Libera, Chiara
    [J]. VISION RESEARCH, 2013, 85 : 58 - 72
  • [8] Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain
    Corbetta, M
    Shulman, GL
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2002, 3 (03) : 201 - 215
  • [9] EFFECT OF NON-TARGET STIMULI UPON LENGTH OF VOLUNTARY SACCADES
    COREN, S
    HOENIG, P
    [J]. PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 1972, 34 (02) : 499 - &
  • [10] Learning to Attend and to Ignore Is a Matter of Gains and Losses
    Della Libera, Chiara
    Chelazzi, Leonardo
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2009, 20 (06) : 778 - 784