Is fairness blind?-The effect of framing on preferences for effort-sharing rules

被引:19
|
作者
Carlsson, Fredrik [1 ]
Kataria, Mitesh [2 ]
Lampi, Elina [1 ]
Lofgren, Asa [1 ]
Sterner, Thomas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Max Planck Inst Econ, Jena, Germany
关键词
Climate change; Fairness; Framing; Ethics; Effort-sharing rules; EQUITY; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.03.015
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
This paper uses a choice experiment to study citizens' preferences for effort-sharing rules for reducing carbon dioxide emissions. For a given global cost and level of emission reduction, we study the willingness to pay for various rules that imply different distributions of the cost between EU, the US. China and Africa. The focus of this paper is on the use of two different treatments, one where the respondents were informed about the country (or country group) names and one where the names were replaced with anonymous labels A-D. This allows us to test whether people's preferences for effort-sharing rules depend on the framing of the problem. We find that the ranking of the rules and the strength of the preferences are not significantly different between the two treatments, and hence we find no evidence of ingroup bias in preferences for effort-sharing rules. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1529 / 1535
页数:7
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Climate change, equity and the relevance of European 'effort-sharing' for global mitigation efforts
    Stephenson, Paule
    Boston, Jonathan
    CLIMATE POLICY, 2010, 10 (01) : 3 - 16
  • [2] Assessment of China's Mitigation Targets in an Effort-Sharing Framework
    Pan, Xunzhang
    Teng, Fei
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (07)
  • [3] Emission allowances and mitigation costs of China and India resulting from different effort-sharing approaches
    van Ruijven, Bas J.
    Weitzel, Matthias
    den Elzen, Michel G. J.
    Hof, Andries F.
    van Vuuren, Detlef P.
    Peterson, Sonja
    Narita, Daiju
    ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 46 : 116 - 134
  • [4] The effect of hunger on children's sharing behavior and fairness preferences
    Huppert, Elizabeth
    Shaw, Alex
    Decety, Jean
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 192
  • [5] Implications of various effort-sharing approaches for national carbon budgets and emission pathways
    van den Berg, Nicole J.
    van Soest, Heleen L.
    Hof, Andries F.
    den Elzen, Michel G. J.
    van Vuuren, Detlef P.
    Chen, Wenying
    Drouet, Laurent
    Emmerling, Johannes
    Fujimori, Shinichiro
    Hoehne, Niklas
    Koberle, Alexandre C.
    McCollum, David
    Schaeffer, Roberto
    Shekhar, Swapnil
    Vishwanathan, Saritha Sudharmma
    Vrontisi, Zoi
    Blok, Kornelis
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2020, 162 (04) : 1805 - 1822
  • [6] Scale and benefit of global carbon markets under the 2°C goal: integrated modeling and an effort-sharing platform
    Wang, Lining
    Chen, Wenying
    Pan, XunZhang
    Li, Nan
    Wang, Huan
    Li, Danyang
    Chen, Han
    MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGIES FOR GLOBAL CHANGE, 2018, 23 (08) : 1207 - 1223
  • [7] Comparative assessment of Japan's long-term carbon budget under different effort-sharing principles
    Kuramochi, Takeshi
    Asuka, Jusen
    Fekete, Hanna
    Tamura, Kentaro
    Hoehne, Niklas
    CLIMATE POLICY, 2016, 16 (08) : 1029 - 1047
  • [8] China's energy system transformation towards the 2 °C goal: Implications of different effort-sharing principles
    Pan Xunzhang
    Chen Wenying
    Clarke, Leon E.
    Wang Lining
    Liu Guannan
    ENERGY POLICY, 2017, 103 : 116 - 126
  • [9] On self-interested preferences for burden sharing rules: An econometric analysis for the costs of energy policy measures
    Groh, Elke D.
    Ziegler, Andreas
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2018, 74 : 417 - 426
  • [10] The effect of luck framing on distributional preferences
    Mercer, Antonio Carlos
    Povoa, Angela Cristiane Santos
    Pech, Wesley
    RESEARCH IN ECONOMICS, 2021, 75 (04) : 320 - 329