Can conservation and development interventions in the Indian Central Himalaya ensure environmental sustainability? A socioecological evaluation

被引:14
作者
Nautiyal, Sunil [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Ecol Econ & Nat Resources, Inst Social & Econ Change, Bangalore 560072, Karnataka, India
关键词
Solutions; Innovations; Diffusion; Sustainable development; Rural complexity; Rural area; Himalaya; DEVI-BIOSPHERE-RESERVE; TRADITIONAL CROP DIVERSITY; PROTECTED AREAS; GARHWAL HIMALAYA; PEOPLE CONFLICTS; WESTERN HIMALAYA; MANAGEMENT; LANDSCAPE; BIODIVERSITY; CULTIVATION;
D O I
10.1007/s11625-011-0126-4
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In biodiversity-rich areas, both conservation and socioeconomic development are at the core of discussions among various stakeholders, such as local people, policymakers, conservationists, resource management professionals, economists, researchers/scientists, and so forth. Various innovations are being provided that aim at promoting both improved livelihood for the people and the conservation and management of natural resources in the Central Himalaya of India. Many studies point out the factors responsible for the tremendous decline of natural resources and also how they have affected the local people's livelihood options. In this context, the current study was undertaken to evaluate the potential of various solutions/innovations that are being implemented in the Himalayas of India. Unfortunately, only a few are found to be successful in both conservation and sustainable livelihood development. This study reveals that people are still looking for more viable solutions that could help them improve their lifestyle, as well as facilitating ecosystem conservation and supporting existing biodiversity. Based on the present study, it is argued that an in-depth empirical study of any region is a necessary process prior to offering solutions to achieve the desired goals, as considered by development agencies and policy-planners.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 167
页数:17
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[2]  
[Anonymous], CULTURAL CRADLE BIOD
[3]  
*APN, 2002, SCOP WORKSH GL UNPUB
[4]   Rethinking community-based conservation [J].
Berkes, F .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2004, 18 (03) :621-630
[5]  
*BIOD HOTSP, 2007, CONS INT
[6]   A suitable site for in situ (on-farm) management of plant diversity in traditional agroecosystems of western Himalaya in Uttaranchal state:: a case study [J].
Bisht, I. S. ;
Rao, K. S. ;
Bhandari, D. C. ;
Nautiyal, Sunil ;
Maikhuri, R. K. ;
Dhillon, B. S. .
GENETIC RESOURCES AND CROP EVOLUTION, 2006, 53 (07) :1333-1350
[7]   Effectiveness of parks in protecting tropical biodiversity [J].
Bruner, AG ;
Gullison, RE ;
Rice, RE ;
da Fonseca, GAB .
SCIENCE, 2001, 291 (5501) :125-128
[8]   When protection falters [J].
Caro, Tim ;
Scholte, Paul .
AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 2007, 45 (03) :233-235
[9]   Biocultural diversity: Moving beyond the realm of 'Indigenous' and 'local' people [J].
Cocks, Michelle .
HUMAN ECOLOGY, 2006, 34 (02) :185-200
[10]  
DHYANI SK, 1999, AGROFOREST SYST, V44, P1