The unequal vulnerability of communities of color to wildfire

被引:170
|
作者
Davies, Ian P. [1 ]
Haugo, Ryan D. [2 ]
Robertson, James C. [3 ]
Levin, Phillip S. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Sch Environm & Forest Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Nature Conservancy, Portland, OR USA
[3] Nature Conservancy, Seattle, WA USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2018年 / 13卷 / 11期
关键词
SOCIAL VULNERABILITY; CLIMATE-CHANGE; RISK; DISASTERS; FIRE; RESILIENCE;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0205825
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Globally, environmental disasters impact billions of people and cost trillions of dollars in damage, and their impacts are often felt most acutely by minority and poor communities. Wildfires in the U.S. have similarly outsized impacts on vulnerable communities, though the ethnic and geographic distribution of those communities may be different than for other hazards. Here, we develop a social-ecological approach for characterizing fire vulnerability and apply it to >70,000 census tracts across the United States. Our approach incorporates both the wildfire potential of a landscape and socioeconomic attributes of overlying communities. We find that over 29 million Americans live with significant potential for extreme wildfires, a majority of whom are white and socioeconomically secure. Within this segment, however, are 12 million socially vulnerable Americans for whom a wildfire event could be devastating. Additionally, wildfire vulnerability is spread unequally across race and ethnicity, with census tracts that were majority Black, Hispanic or Native American experiencing ca. 50% greater vulnerability to wildfire compared to other census tracts. Embracing a social-ecological perspective of fire-prone landscapes allows for the identification of areas that are poorly equipped to respond to wildfires.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Unequal Protection Revisited: Planning for Environmental Justice, Hazard Vulnerability, and Critical Infrastructure in Communities of Color
    Hendricks, Marccus D.
    Van Zandt, Shannon
    ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, 2021, 14 (02) : 87 - 97
  • [2] Local Community Agency and Vulnerability Influences on a Montana Wildfire
    Carroll, Matthew S.
    Paveglio, Travis
    JOURNAL OF FORESTRY, 2019, 117 (02) : 104 - 113
  • [3] The adaptive capacity of New Zealand communities to wildfire
    Jakes, Pamela J.
    Langer, E. R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WILDLAND FIRE, 2012, 21 (06) : 764 - 772
  • [4] Assessing influences on social vulnerability to wildfire using surveys, spatial data and wildfire simulations
    Paveglio, Travis B.
    Edgeley, Catrin M.
    Stasiewicz, Amanda M.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 213 : 425 - 439
  • [5] Production of risk: multiple interacting exposures and unequal vulnerability in coastal communities
    Oulahen, Greg
    McBean, Gordon
    Shrubsole, Dan
    Chang, Stephanie E.
    REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE, 2019, 19 (03) : 867 - 877
  • [6] Production of risk: multiple interacting exposures and unequal vulnerability in coastal communities
    Greg Oulahen
    Gordon McBean
    Dan Shrubsole
    Stephanie E. Chang
    Regional Environmental Change, 2019, 19 : 867 - 877
  • [7] Vulnerability of California roadways to post-wildfire debris flows
    Li, Rui
    Chester, Mikhail, V
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH: INFRASTRUCTURE AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 3 (01):
  • [8] Wildfire risk in Alaska: Spatial association between social vulnerability, wildfire hazard, and wildfire mitigation programs
    Liang, Xiaoyu
    Liu, Desheng
    LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2025, 258
  • [9] Evaluating the Characteristics of Social Vulnerability to Wildfire: Demographics, Perceptions, and Parcel Characteristics
    Paveglio, Travis B.
    Prato, Tony
    Edgeley, Catrin
    Nalle, Darek
    ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2016, 58 (03) : 534 - 548
  • [10] Wildfire risk, post-fire debris flows, and transportation infrastructure vulnerability
    Fraser, Andrew M.
    Chester, Mikhail, V
    Underwood, B. Shane
    SUSTAINABLE AND RESILIENT INFRASTRUCTURE, 2022, 7 (03) : 188 - 200