First, do no harm: An intensive experience sampling study of adverse effects to mindfulness training

被引:27
作者
Aizik-Reebs, Anna [1 ]
Shoham, Adi [1 ]
Bernstein, Amit [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Haifa, Haifa, Israel
关键词
Mindfulness; Meditation; Experience sampling; Adverse effects; CLINICAL-SIGNIFICANCE; RELIABLE CHANGE; PSYCHOTHERAPY; VALIDATION; CHALLENGES; SCALE; RECOMMENDATIONS; INTERVENTIONS; DEPRESSION; DISORDERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.brat.2021.103941
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Objective: The study of safety and adverse effects of mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) is limited. We propose a novel reliable change index (RCI) approach to experience sampling (ES) data to begin to understand the common domains, frequency, severity, risk for, and context of adverse responding to mindfulness meditation practice and brief MBI. Methods: Over the course of a 21-day MBI among 82 meditation-naive participants, we estimated (i) momentary adverse effects during mindfulness meditation practice and (ii) sustained adverse effects in daily living following the intervention. Results: First, RCI analyses of experience sampling of mindfulness meditation document that 87% of participants demonstrated at least one momentary adverse effect during meditation, most commonly anxiety; and subjectlevel temporal variability or instability in experience samples of daily living did not account for momentary adverse effects attributed to mindfulness meditation sessions. Second, 25% of participants experienced a sustained adverse effect in daily living at post-intervention. Yet, neither momentary adverse effects to meditation nor vulnerability factors at pre-intervention predicted adverse effects at post-intervention. Conclusions: Findings illustrate that mindfulness meditation may be transiently anxiogenic for many participants, yet, these experiences are unlikely to constitute objective harm per se. Furthermore, observed deterioration in daily living post-intervention cannot be attributed to momentary adverse effects in response to mindfulness meditation. We speculate that observed deterioration in daily living post-intervention may thus be better explained by increased awareness to internal states following mindfulness training. Findings highlight the potential utility of applying a RCI approach to intensive ES measurement to quantify adverse effects of mindfulness training specifically and mental health interventions broadly.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]   Mindfulness-Based Trauma Recovery for Refugees (MBTR-R): Randomized Waitlist-Control Evidence of Efficacy and Safety [J].
Aizik-Reebs, Anna ;
Yuval, Kim ;
Hadash, Yuval ;
Gebreyohans Gebremariam, Solomon ;
Bernstein, Amit .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 9 (06) :1164-1184
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1971, PRACTICAL INSIGHT ME
[3]  
Baer R.A., 2015, Mindfulness-based treatment approaches: Clinician's guide to evidence base and applications
[4]   Doing no harm in mindfulness-based programs: Conceptual issues and empirical findings [J].
Baer, Ruth ;
Crane, Catherine ;
Miller, Edward ;
Kuyken, Willem .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2019, 71 :101-114
[5]   Why Can't We Be More Idiographic in Our Research? [J].
Barlow, David H. ;
Nock, Matthew K. .
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2009, 4 (01) :19-21
[6]   AN INVENTORY FOR MEASURING CLINICAL ANXIETY - PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES [J].
BECK, AT ;
BROWN, G ;
EPSTEIN, N ;
STEER, RA .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 56 (06) :893-897
[7]  
Behar E. S, 2013, HDB PSYCHOL RES METH, V2
[8]   Challenging the Construct Validity of Mindfulness Assessment-a Cognitive Interview Study of the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory [J].
Belzer, Florian ;
Schmidt, Stefan ;
Lucius-Hoene, Gabriele ;
Schneider, Johann F. ;
Orellana-Rios, Claudia L. ;
Sauer, Sebastian .
MINDFULNESS, 2013, 4 (01) :33-44
[9]   Understanding mindfulness, one moment at a time: an introduction to the special issue [J].
Bernstein, Amit ;
Vago, David R. ;
Barnhofer, Thorsten .
CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 28 :VI-X
[10]  
Bolger N., 2013, Methodology in the Social Sciences