Reliability evaluation in seismic design:: A response surface methodology

被引:13
|
作者
Möller, O
Foschi, RO
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Rosario, IMAE, RA-2000 Rosario, Argentina
[2] Univ British Columbia, Dept Civil Engn, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1193/1.1598200
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Performance-based seismic design requires consideration of the uncertainties in corresponding demands and capacities. A response surface methodology is used to evaluate the annual exceedance probability in each specified, damage-related performance level. The nonlinear dynamic response of the structure to the seismic action is studied considering, among the uncertainties, the peak acceleration and the frequency content of the ground motion. Advantages and disadvantages of two types of response surface formulations are discussed, including two ways of considering dispersion produced by different ground motions. The procedure is illustrated with two examples: an elevated water tank and a five-story portal frame. Finally, the method is applied to the calibration of a deterministic, factored design code approach with multiple performance objectives.
引用
收藏
页码:579 / 603
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Stochastic seismic response analysis and reliability evaluation of pipelines in liquefied soil
    Xu B.
    Chen K.
    Wang X.
    Pang R.
    Yantu Gongcheng Xuebao/Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2024, 46 (01): : 81 - 89
  • [32] A New Reliability Evaluation Methodology With Application to Lifetime Oriented Circuit Design
    Sajjadi-Kia, Hamed
    Ababei, Cristinel
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON DEVICE AND MATERIALS RELIABILITY, 2013, 13 (01) : 192 - 202
  • [33] Seismic fragility assessment framework for highway bridges based on an improved uniform design-response surface model methodology
    Li, Huihui
    Li, Lifeng
    Wu, Wenpeng
    Xu, Liang
    BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2020, 18 (05) : 2329 - 2353
  • [34] Seismic fragility assessment framework for highway bridges based on an improved uniform design-response surface model methodology
    Huihui Li
    Lifeng Li
    Wenpeng Wu
    Liang Xu
    Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2020, 18 : 2329 - 2353
  • [35] Bridge seismic reliability analysis based on improved Kriging response surface method
    Jia, Bu-Yu
    Yu, Xiao-Lin
    Yan, Quan-Sheng
    Chen, Zhou
    Zhendong yu Chongji/Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2013, 32 (16): : 82 - 87
  • [36] Seismic structural reliability using different nonlinear dynamic response surface approximations
    Moller, Oscar
    Foschi, Ricardo O.
    Rubinstein, Marcelo
    Quiroz, Laura
    STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2009, 31 (05) : 432 - 442
  • [37] Design and Evaluation of a Breast-Specific Collimator Using Response Surface Methodology and Monte Carlo Simulations
    Talat, Didar
    Guvenis, Albert
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 2016, 63 (01) : 98 - 107
  • [38] Device robust-design by using response surface methodology
    Xie, Xiaofeng
    Lu, Yong
    Zhang, Wenjun
    Yang, Zhilian
    2002, Science Press (23):
  • [39] Quality chain design and optimization by multiple response surface methodology
    Hejazi, Taha Hossein
    Seyyed-Esfahani, Mirmehdi
    Mahootchi, Masoud
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 68 (1-4): : 881 - 893
  • [40] Design and optimization of a siphon turbine using the response surface methodology
    Guerra, Juliana
    Velasquez, Laura
    Rubio-Clemente, Ainhoa
    Jaramillo, Leyla
    Chica, Edwin
    RESULTS IN ENGINEERING, 2024, 22