The Effect of Cannabis-Based Medicine in the Treatment of Cachexia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:14
作者
Hammond, Samuel [1 ]
Erridge, Simon [1 ]
Mangal, Nagina [2 ]
Pacchetti, Barbara [3 ]
Sodergren, Mikael H. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, Acad Surg Unit, Dept Surg & Canc, London, England
[2] Hammersmith Hosp, Dept Surg & Canc, London, England
[3] Curaleaf Int, London, England
关键词
cachexia; cannabinoids; cannabis; weight loss; appetite; CANCER CACHEXIA; ENDOCANNABINOID SYSTEM; COMBINATION THERAPY; MEGESTROL-ACETATE; ANOREXIA; DRONABINOL; ACID; PHARMACOKINETICS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1089/can.2021.0048
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: Cachexia is a prevalent condition associated with underlying chronic disease. Wasting of skeletal muscle and adipose tissue loss in cachectic patients is associated with higher rates of disability, reduced quality of life (QoL), and worse prognosis. There is a large unmet need to develop strategies to treat cachexia as there are currently no standardized guidelines in the management of cachexia. Activation of endogenous cannabinoid receptors, through exogenous cannabinoids, has demonstrated potential in increasing appetite, reducing catabolism, and has shown anti-inflammatory properties. Since no single pharmacological agent is currently recommended for use in cachexia, the potential of cannabinoids as an appetite stimulant warrants further research and assessment of current evidence.</p> Objective: This review aims to evaluate the evidence for the efficacy of cannabis-based medicinal products, against placebo and other active treatments, in anorexia-cachexia syndrome in improving appetite, weight, and QoL.</p> Methods: A literature search of the Medline, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and the Web of Science Core Collection, for articles published up to February 2020, was conducted. All randomized controlled trials comparing the use of cannabis-based medicine versus placebo/active treatments for patients with cachexia were screened. The quality of evidence in included studies was assessed using the GRADE framework and any risk of bias was judged using the Cochrane risk of bias tool.</p> Results: A total of five studies, encompassing 934 participants, were found to be eligible. The pooled group effect size for change in appetite was -1.79 (95% confidence interval: -3.77 to 0.19) favoring the control group (p=0.08). Additionally, no significant difference for weight change or change in QoL for cannabinoids versus placebo/other treatment was observed. The quality of evidence for all five studies was assessed to be low.</p> Conclusion: There is a lack of high-quality evidence to recommend the use of cannabinoids in the treatment of cachexia. Given the limited available pharmacological options for cachexia and the potential for cannabinoids to increase appetite and alter the immune system, further research is needed before clinical recommendations on the pharmacological management of cachexia can be made.</p>
引用
收藏
页码:474 / 487
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Neurocognitive consequences of chronic cannabis use: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Figueiredo, Pedro Rafael
    Tolomeo, Serenella
    Steele, J. Douglas
    Baldacchino, Alexander
    NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2020, 108 : 358 - 369
  • [42] The association between cannabis and depression: an updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Churchill, Victoria
    Chubb, Caroline Sutton
    Popova, Lucy
    Spears, Claire A.
    Pigott, Terri
    PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2025, 55
  • [43] Cannabis Use in Pregnancy and Neonatal Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Lo, Jamie O.
    Shaw, Beth
    Robalino, Shannon
    Ayers, Chelsea K.
    Durbin, Shauna
    Rushkin, Megan C.
    Olyaei, Amy
    Kansagara, Devan
    Harrod, Curtis S.
    CANNABIS AND CANNABINOID RESEARCH, 2024, 9 (02) : 470 - 485
  • [44] Cannabis exposure and risk of testicular cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    J. Gurney
    C. Shaw
    J. Stanley
    V. Signal
    D. Sarfati
    BMC Cancer, 15
  • [45] The Safety of Dronabinol and Nabilone: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
    Bajtel, Akos
    Kiss, Tivadar
    Toth, Barbara
    Kiss, Szabolcs
    Hegyi, Peter
    Vorhendi, Nora
    Csupor-Loffler, Boglarka
    Gede, Noemi
    Hohmann, Judit
    Csupor, Dezso
    PHARMACEUTICALS, 2022, 15 (01)
  • [46] The relationship between cannabis and nicotine use: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yimer, Tesfa Mekonen
    McClure-Thomas, Caitlin
    Stjepanovic, Daniel
    Wilson, Jack
    Chan, Gary Chung Kai
    Hall, Wayne Denis
    Leung, Janni
    ADDICTION, 2024, 119 (12) : 2076 - 2087
  • [47] Cannabis-based medicine in treatment of patients with Gilles de la Tourette syndrome
    Szejko, Natalia
    Saramak, Kamila
    Lombroso, Adam
    Mueller-Vahl, Kirsten R.
    NEUROLOGIA I NEUROCHIRURGIA POLSKA, 2022, 56 (01) : 28 - 38
  • [48] Motivational Interviewing for Cannabis Use Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Calomarde-Gomez, Cristina
    Jimenez-Fernandez, Bel
    Balcells-Olivero, Mercedes
    Gual, Antoni
    Lopez-Pelayo, Hugo
    EUROPEAN ADDICTION RESEARCH, 2021, 27 (06) : 413 - 427
  • [49] Fetal Cannabis Exposure and Neonatal Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Bailey, Anna
    Kerr, Whitney
    Alhay, Zahra
    Rom, Morgan
    Hamilton, Sheryl
    Campbell, Janis
    Kuhn, Katrin
    Thompson, David
    Reese, Jessica A.
    MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH JOURNAL, 2025, : 703 - 713
  • [50] General risks of harm with cannabinoids, cannabis, and cannabis-based medicine possibly relevant to patients receiving these for pain management: an overview of systematic reviews
    Mohiuddin, Mohammed
    Blyth, Fiona M.
    Degenhardt, Louisa
    Di Forti, Marta
    Eccleston, Christopher
    Haroutounian, Simon
    Moore, Andrew
    Rice, Andrew S. C.
    Wallace, Mark
    Park, Rex
    Gilron, Ian
    PAIN, 2021, 162 : S80 - S96