Application of the SCAI classification in a cohort of patients with cardiogenic shock

被引:132
|
作者
Schrage, Benedikt [1 ,2 ]
Dabboura, Salim [1 ]
Yan, Isabell [1 ]
Hilal, Rafel [1 ]
Neumann, Johannes T. [1 ,2 ]
Sorensen, Nils A. [1 ,2 ]
Gossling, Alina [1 ]
Becher, Peter Moritz [1 ]
Grahn, Hanno [1 ]
Wagner, Tobias [1 ]
Seiffert, Moritz [1 ]
Kluge, Stefan [3 ]
Reichenspurner, Hermann [4 ]
Blankenberg, Stefan [1 ,2 ]
Westermann, Dirk [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Heart Ctr Hamburg, Dept Intervent & Gen Cardiol, Hamburg, Germany
[2] Partner Site Hamburg Lubeck Kiel, German Ctr Cardiovasc Res DZHK, Hamburg, Germany
[3] Univ Clin Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Intens Care Med, Hamburg, Germany
[4] Univ Heart Ctr Hamburg, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Hamburg, Germany
关键词
cardiogenic shock; classification; SCAI; MECHANICAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT; MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1002/ccd.28707
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background The Society of Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) have recently proposed a new classification of cardiogenic shock (CS) dividing patients into five subgroups. Objective Aim of this study was to apply the SCAI classification to a cohort of patients presenting with CS and to evaluate its ability to predict 30-day survival. Methods SCAI CS subgroups were interpreted based on the recent consensus statement and then applied to N = 1,007 consecutive patients presenting with CS or large myocardial infarction (MI) between October 2009 and October 2017. The association between SCAI classification and 30-day all-cause mortality was assessed by logistic regression analysis. Results Mean age in the study cohort was 67 (+/- 15) years, 72% were male. Mean lactate at baseline was 6.05 (+/- 5.13) mmol/l and 51% of the patients had prior cardiac arrest. Overall survival probability was 50.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 47.5-54.0%). In view of the SCAI classification, the survival probability was 96.4% (95% CI 93.7-99.0%) in class A, 66.1% (95% CI 50.2-87.1%) in class B, 46.1% (95% CI 40.6-52.4%) in class C, 33.1% (95% CI 26.6-41.1%) in class D, and 22.6% (95% CI 17.1-30.0%) in class E. Higher SCAI classification was significantly associated with lower 30-day survival (p < .01). Conclusion In this large clinical cohort, the SCAI classification was significantly associated with 30-day survival. This finding supports the rationale of the SCAI CS classification and calls for a validation in a prospective trial.
引用
收藏
页码:E213 / E219
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Timing and treatment strategies according to SCAI classification in cardiogenic shock
    Tarantini, Giuseppe
    Masiero, Giulia
    Thiele, Holger
    Iannaccone, Mario
    Schrage, Benedikt
    Hassager, Christian
    Woitek, Felix
    Chieffo, Alaide
    Moller, Jacob Eifer
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL SUPPLEMENTS, 2023, 25 : I19 - I23
  • [2] Prognostic performance of the SCAI shock classification at admission and during ICU treatment: A retrospective, observational cohort study
    Britsch, Simone
    Britsch, Markward
    Hahn, Leonie
    Langer, Harald
    Lindner, Simon
    Akin, Ibrahim
    Helbing, Thomas
    Duerschmied, Daniel
    Becher, Tobias
    HEART & LUNG, 2024, 68 : 52 - 59
  • [3] SCAI Staging Application for Acute Myocardial Infarction-Related Cardiogenic Shock at a Single-Center Russian Registry
    Ryabov, Vyacheslav V.
    Panteleev, Oleg O.
    Kercheva, Maria A.
    Gorokhovsky, Alexei A.
    Syrkina, Anna G.
    Margolis, Natalia Y.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (24)
  • [4] SCAI cardiogenic shock classification after out of hospital cardiac arrest and association with outcome??
    Pareek, Nilesh
    Dworakowski, Rafal
    Webb, Ian
    Barash, Jemma
    Emezu, Gift
    Melikian, Narbeh
    Hill, Jonathan
    Shah, Ajay
    MacCarthy, Philip
    Byrne, Jonathan
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2021, 97 (03) : E288 - E297
  • [5] Prospective validation of the SCAI shock classification: Single center analysis
    Baran, David A.
    Long, Ashleigh
    Badiye, Amit P.
    Stelling, Kelly
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2020, 96 (07) : 1339 - 1347
  • [6] Important lessons from cardiogenic shock deaths with insight into normotensive cardiogenic shock, the trajectory of scai shock severity and timing of referrals for mechanical circulatory support
    Tran, Patrick
    Joshi, Mithilesh
    Banerjee, Prithwish
    Otabor, Emmanuel
    Adeyeye, Stephen
    Kuehl, Michael
    HEART, 2023, 109 : A152 - A154
  • [7] Cardiogenic Shock Pathogenesis, Classification, and Management
    Sarma, Dhruv
    Jentzer, Jacob C.
    CRITICAL CARE CLINICS, 2024, 40 (01) : 37 - 56
  • [8] Invasive Hemodynamic Assessment and Classification of In-Hospital Mortality Risk Among Patients With Cardiogenic Shock
    Thayer, Katherine L.
    Zweck, Elric
    Ayouty, Mohyee
    Garan, A. Reshad
    Hernandez-Montfort, Jaime
    Mahr, Claudius
    Morine, Kevin J.
    Newman, Sarah
    Jorde, Lena
    Haywood, Jillian L.
    Harwani, Neil M.
    Esposito, Michele L.
    Davila, Carlos D.
    Wencker, Detlef
    Sinha, Shashank S.
    Vorovich, Esther
    Abraham, Jacob
    O'Neill, William
    Udelson, James
    Burkhoff, Daniel
    Kapur, Navin K.
    CIRCULATION-HEART FAILURE, 2020, 13 (09) : E007099
  • [9] The SCAI Cardiogenic Shock Staging System Gets Taken for a Test Drive
    Burkhoff, Daniel
    Garan, Arthur Reshad
    Kapur, Navin K.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 74 (17) : 2129 - 2131
  • [10] Impact of Age on Outcomes in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock
    Kanwar, Manreet
    Thayer, Katherine L.
    Garan, Arthur Reshad
    Hernandez-Montfort, Jaime
    Whitehead, Evan
    Mahr, Claudius
    Sinha, Shashank S.
    Vorovich, Esther
    Harwani, Neil M.
    Zweck, Elric
    Abraham, Jacob
    Burkhoff, Daniel
    Kapur, Navin K.
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2021, 8