The validity of the Brief Michigan Alcohol Screening Test (bMAST) as a problem drinking severity measure

被引:31
作者
Connor, Jason P.
Grier, Maree
Feeney, Gerald F. X. [1 ]
Young, Ross McD.
机构
[1] Princess Alexandra Hosp, Alcohol & Drug Assessment Unit, Brisbane, Qld 4102, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Discipline Psychiat, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Univ Queensland, Sch Psychol, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[4] Queensland Univ Technol, Inst Hlth & Biomed Innovat, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.15288/jsad.2007.68.771
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The Brief Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test (bMAST) is a 10-item test derived from the 25-item Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test (MAST). It is widely used in the assessment of alcohol dependence. In the absence of previous validation studies, the principal aim of this study was to assess the validity and reliability of the bMAST as a measure of the severity of problem drinking. Method: There were 6,594 patients (4,854 men, 1,740 women) who had been referred for alcohol-use disorders to a hospital alcohol and drug service who voluntarily participated in this study. Results: An exploratory factor analysis defined a two-factor solution, consisting of Perception of Current Drinking and Drinking Consequences factors. Structural equation modeling confirmed that the fit of a nine-item, two-factor model was superior to the original one-factor model. Concurrent validity was assessed through simultaneous administration of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) and associations with alcohol consumption and clinically assessed features of alcohol dependence. The two-factor bMAST model showed moderate correlations with the AUDIT. The two-factor bMAST and AUDIT were similarly associated with quantity of alcohol consumption and clinically assessed dependence severity features. No differences were observed between the existing weighted scoring system and the proposed simple scoring system. Conclusions: In this study, both the existing bMAST total score and the two-factor model identified were as effective as the AUDIT in assessing problem drinking severity There are additional advantages of employing the two-factor bMAST in the assessment and treatment planning of patients seeking treatment for alcohol-use disorders.
引用
收藏
页码:771 / 779
页数:9
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]   Coexisting psychiatric disorders, in a New Zealand outpatient alcohol and other drug clinical population [J].
Adamson, SJ ;
Todd, FC ;
Sellman, JD ;
Huriwai, T ;
Porter, J .
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2006, 40 (02) :164-170
[2]   A review of research on the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) [J].
Allen, JP ;
Litten, RZ ;
Fertig, JB ;
Babor, T .
ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 1997, 21 (04) :613-619
[3]   The alcohol use disorders identification test: An aid to recognition of alcohol problems in primary care patients [J].
Allen, JP ;
Reinert, DF ;
Volk, RJ .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2001, 33 (05) :428-433
[4]  
American Psychiatric Association, 2000, Text revision (DSM-IV-TR), DOI [10.1176/dsm10.1176/appi.books.9780890420249.dsm-iv-tr, DOI 10.1176/DSM10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890420249.DSM-IV-TR]
[5]  
*AUSTR I HLTH WELF, 2004, AUSTR HLTH 2004 9 BI
[6]   Alcohol screening and brief intervention: dissemination strategies for medical practice and public health [J].
Babor, TF ;
Higgins-Biddle, JC .
ADDICTION, 2000, 95 (05) :677-686
[7]   THE ALCOHOL-USE DISORDERS IDENTIFICATION TEST (AUDIT) - VALIDATION OF A SCREENING INSTRUMENT FOR USE IN MEDICAL SETTINGS [J].
BOHN, MJ ;
BABOR, TF ;
KRANZLER, HR .
JOURNAL OF STUDIES ON ALCOHOL, 1995, 56 (04) :423-432
[8]   AGE AND ETHNICITY AMONG HOSPITALIZED ALCOHOLICS - A NATIONWIDE STUDY [J].
BOOTH, BM ;
BLOW, FC ;
COOK, CAL ;
BUNN, JY ;
FORTNEY, JC .
ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 1992, 16 (06) :1029-1034
[9]   Alcohol screening questionnaires in women - A critical review [J].
Bradley, KA ;
Boyd-Wickizer, J ;
Powell, SH ;
Burman, ML .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (02) :166-171
[10]   The efficacy of motivational interviewing: A meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials [J].
Burke, BL ;
Arkowitz, H ;
Menchola, M .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 71 (05) :843-861