Correlation between granulocyte/macrophage-colony-forming units and CD34+ cells in apheresis products from patients treated with different chemotherapy regimens and granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor to mobilize peripheral blood progenitor cells

We examined the efficiency of disease-specific "standard" chemotherapies epirubicin, cyclophosphamide (EC); cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, etoposide, prednisolone (CHOEP); epirubicin, ifosfamide (EPI/IFOS) for peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) mobilization in comparison to well-characterized mobilization protocols, i.e. etoposide, ifosfamide, cisplatin, epirubicin (VIPE) and dexamethasone, carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan (Dexa-BEAM). Twenty-seven patients with various malignancies underwent 75 apheresis procedures for PBPC collection. Median cell yields from all 75 aphereses were 1.18 x 10(5) mononuclear cells/kg [range (0.28-3.7) x 10(8)], 1.4 x 10(5) granulocyte/macrophage-colony-forming units (CFU-GM)/kg [range (0.2-11) x 10(5)] and 3.3 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg [range (0.35-17.7) x 10(6). CD34(+)/CD90(+) cells could be mobilized by all mobilization regimens used. The difference observed in the mobilization of CD34(+) cells was only of low significance when the mobilization regimens were compared, whereas the mobilizations of MNC and CFU-GM were significantly different between the groups. Breast cancer patients treated with the VIPE regimen (including pretreated women) had a significantly higher CFU-GM rate than patients treated with EC (P = 0.0005). Mobilized CD34+ PBPC were correlated with CFU-GM in all apheresis products. The linear correlation coefficients differed for the various mobilization groups: Dexa-BEAM (i = 0.9, P < 0.0001), VIPE (r = 0.68, P = 0.0024), CHOEP (r = 0.52, P = 0.022), EPI/IFOS (r = 0.34, P = 0.11) and EC (r = 0.23, P = 0.2). We conclude that clonogenic assays can provide additional information about the autotransplant quality, particularly when alternative or new mobilization regimens are being investigated.