Delay discounting associated with challenges to treatment adherence and glycemic control in young adults with type 1 diabetes

被引:19
作者
Stoianova, Maria [1 ]
Tampke, Elizabeth C. [1 ,2 ]
Lansing, Amy Hughes [1 ,3 ]
Stanger, Catherine [1 ]
机构
[1] Geisel Sch Med Dartmouth, Dept Psychiat, Hinman Box 7255, Lebanon, NH 03766 USA
[2] Univ Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
[3] Univ Nevada, Reno, NV 89557 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Adherence; Delay discounting; HbA1c; Type; 1; diabetes; Young adult; ENERGY-INTAKE; FUTURE; CARE; ADOLESCENTS; TRANSITION; YOUTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.beproc.2018.06.013
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Introduction: Many young adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) face challenges in adherence to self-management practices and have above-target HbA1c. Poorer decision-making skills, indicated by greater delay discounting, may be linked to these factors. Methods: An online survey using social media ads targeted young adults aged 18-26 with T1D. Participants completed the Self-Care Inventory and the 5-trial delay discounting task and self-reported their last HbA1c value. Results: Discounting was significantly associated with treatment adherence (r = -.14, p < .05) and HbA1c (r = .18, p < .01). Adherence was also associated with HbAlc (r = -.26, p < .01). In a hierarchical regression, adding discounting explained significant additional variance in HbAlc after controlling demographics (F(1, 257) = 3.99, p < .05); adding adherence next explained significant additional variance in HbAlc (F(1, 256) = 12.96,p < .01). In the final model, adherence significantly explained HbAlc variance (beta = -.21,p < .01). Discussion: These results expand the literature on cognitive factors and glycemic control among patients with T1D. Factors like delay discounting represent potentially modifiable risk factors targetable through interventions.
引用
收藏
页码:474 / 477
页数:4
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Barriers to glycemic control in youth with type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes [J].
Anderson, Barbara J. ;
McKay, Siripoom V. .
PEDIATRIC DIABETES, 2011, 12 (03) :197-205
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1987, The effect of delay and of intervening events on reinforcement value
[3]   Episodic future thinking [J].
Atance, CM ;
O'Neill, DK .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2001, 5 (12) :533-539
[4]   The T1D Exchange Clinic Registry [J].
Beck, Roy W. ;
Tamborlane, William V. ;
Bergenstal, Richard M. ;
Miller, Kellee M. ;
DuBose, Stephanie N. ;
Hall, Callyn A. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2012, 97 (12) :4383-4389
[5]   Excessive discounting of delayed reinforcers as a trans-disease process contributing to addiction and other disease-related vulnerabilities: Emerging evidence [J].
Bickel, Warren K. ;
Jarmolowicz, David P. ;
Mueller, E. Terry ;
Koffarnus, Mikhail N. ;
Gatchalian, Kirstin M. .
PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2012, 134 (03) :287-297
[6]   Type 1 Diabetes Through the Life Span: A Position Statement of the American Diabetes Association [J].
Chiang, Jane L. ;
Kirkman, M. Sue ;
Laffel, Lori M. B. ;
Peters, Anne L. .
DIABETES CARE, 2014, 37 (07) :2034-2054
[7]   Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) changes over time among adolescent and young adult participants in the T1D exchange clinic registry [J].
Clements, Mark A. ;
Foster, Nicole C. ;
Maahs, David M. ;
Schatz, Desmond A. ;
Olson, Beth A. ;
Tsalikian, Eva ;
Lee, Joyce M. ;
Burt-Solorzano, Christine M. ;
Tamborlane, William V. ;
Chen, Vincent ;
Miller, Kellee M. ;
Beck, Roy W. .
PEDIATRIC DIABETES, 2016, 17 (05) :327-336
[8]   Episodic future thinking reduces delay discounting and energy intake in children [J].
Daniel, Tinuke Oluyomi ;
Said, Michele ;
Stanton, Christina M. ;
Epstein, Leonard H. .
EATING BEHAVIORS, 2015, 18 :20-24
[9]   The Future Is Now: Reducing Impulsivity and Energy Intake Using Episodic Future Thinking [J].
Daniel, Tinuke Oluyomi ;
Stanton, Christina M. ;
Epstein, Leonard H. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2013, 24 (11) :2339-2342
[10]  
Diabet Control Complications Trial DCCT Res Grp, 1995, AM J CARDIOL, V75, P894