Functional and oncological outcomes of open laparoscopic and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a multicentre comparative matched-pair analyses with a median of 5 years' follow-up

被引:114
作者
Chang, Ki Don [1 ]
Raheem, Ali Abdel [2 ,3 ]
Kim, Kwang Hyun [4 ]
Oh, Cheol Kyu [5 ]
Park, Sung Yul [6 ]
Kim, Young Sik [7 ]
Ham, Won Sik [2 ]
Han, Woong Kyu [2 ]
Choi, Young Deuk [2 ]
Chung, Byung Ha [2 ]
Rha, Koon Ho [2 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Wonju Univ, Coll Med, Urol Sci Inst, Dept Urol, Wonju, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Urol Sci Inst, Dept Urol, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Tanta Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Tanta, Egypt
[4] Ewha Womans Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Inje Univ, Haeundae Paik Hosp, Dept Urol, Busan, South Korea
[6] Hanyang Univ, Coll Med, Dept Urol, Seoul, South Korea
[7] Ilsan Hosp, Natl Hlth Insurance Serv, Dept Urol, Goyang Si, South Korea
关键词
partial nephrectomy; robot-assisted; open; laparoscopic; long-term outcomes; NORMAL CONTRALATERAL KIDNEY; RENAL-CELL CARCINOMA; RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY; RECORD PROJECT; SURGERY; EXPERIENCE; TRIFECTA; MASSES; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1111/bju.14250
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To compare outcomes at a 5-year median follow-up among different partial nephrectomy (PN) approaches: robot-assisted (RAPN), laparoscopic (LPN) and open partial nephrectomy (OPN). Patients and Methods We retrospectively analysed 1 308 patients who underwent PN (RAPN, n = 380; LPN, n = 206; OPN, n = 722) between 2006 and 2012 at one of four academic centres. We performed 1:1:1 propensity-score-matching adjustment based on confounding variables among groups, and 366 patients (122 in each group) were included in the final analysis. Survival rates were analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results The median follow-up periods were 60, 59.8 and 64.1 months for RAPN, LPN and OPN, respectively. In the matched groups, RAPN resulted in significantly lower mean estimated blood loss compared with LPN (P = 0.025) and OPN (P = 0.040), while LPN was associated with a longer mean operating time compared with RAPN (P = 0.001) and OPN (P = 0.001). The hospital stay was shorter in the RAPN group (P = 0.008). Regarding the oncological outcomes, there were no significant differences among the three groups in local recurrence rate (P = 0.882), distant metastasis rate (P = 0.816) or deaths from cancer (P = 0.779). At latest follow-up, the incidence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) upstaging was significantly lower in RAPN compared with LPN (20.55% vs 32%; P = 0.035) and OPN (20.5% vs 33.6%; P = 0.038). The 5-year CKD free-survival rate was significantly higher (78.4%) in the RAPN group compared with 58.8% and 65.8% in the LPN and OPN groups, respectively (log-rank P = 0.031). Conclusions In the present study, RAPN, LPN and OPN had similar local recurrence, distant metastasis and cancer-related death rates at a 5-year median follow-up. In terms of functional outcomes, RAPN was associated with a lower incidence of CKD upstaging compared with OPN and LPN.
引用
收藏
页码:618 / 626
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Aboumarzouk, Omar M. ;
Stein, Robert J. ;
Eyraud, Remi ;
Haber, Georges-Pascal ;
Chlosta, Piotr L. ;
Somani, Bhaskar K. ;
Kaouk, Jihad H. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2012, 62 (06) :1023-1033
[2]   Comparison of the trifecta outcomes of robotic and open nephron-sparing surgeries performed in the robotic era of a single institution [J].
Acar, Omer ;
Isik, Esin Ozturk ;
Mut, Tuna ;
Saglican, Yesim ;
Onay, Aslihan ;
Vural, Metin ;
Musaoglu, Ahmet ;
Esen, Tarik .
SPRINGERPLUS, 2015, 4
[3]   Five-year Oncologic Outcomes After Transperitoneal Robotic Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Cell Carcinoma [J].
Andrade, Hiury S. ;
Zargar, Homayoun ;
Caputo, Peter A. ;
Akca, Oktay ;
Kara, Onder ;
Ramirez, Daniel ;
Haber, Georges-Pascal ;
Stein, Robert J. ;
Kaouk, Jihad H. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (06) :1149-1154
[4]   Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes Between Robotic and Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [J].
Choi, Ji Eun ;
You, Ji Hye ;
Kim, Dae Keun ;
Rha, Koon Ho ;
Lee, Seon Heui .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2015, 67 (05) :891-901
[5]   Partial nephrectomy for unilateral renal carcinoma and a normal contralateral kidney: 10-year followup [J].
Herr, HW .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1999, 161 (01) :33-34
[6]   National utilization trends of partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: A case of underutilization? [J].
Hollenbeck, BK ;
Taub, DA ;
Miller, DC ;
Dunn, RL ;
Wei, JT .
UROLOGY, 2006, 67 (02) :254-259
[7]   Comparison of Video-Assisted Minilaparotomy, Open, and Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Masses [J].
Jeon, Hwang Gyun ;
Choi, Kyung Hwa ;
Kim, Kwang Hyun ;
Rha, Koon Ho ;
Yang, Seung Choul ;
Han, Woong Kyu .
YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 53 (01) :151-157
[8]   Three-year Oncologic and Renal Functional Outcomes After Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy [J].
Khalifeh, Ali ;
Autorino, Riccardo ;
Eyraud, Remi ;
Samarasekera, Dinesh ;
Laydner, Humberto ;
Panumatrassamee, Kamol ;
Stein, Robert J. ;
Kaouk, Jihad H. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2013, 64 (05) :744-750
[9]   Comparative Outcomes and Assessment of Trifecta in 500 Robotic and Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy Cases: A Single Surgeon Experience [J].
Khalifeh, Ali ;
Autorino, Riccardo ;
Hillyer, Shahab P. ;
Laydner, Humberto ;
Eyraud, Remi ;
Panumatrassamee, Kamol ;
Long, Jean-Alexandre ;
Kaouk, Jihad H. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (04) :1236-1242
[10]   Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy in Patients with Baseline Chronic Kidney Disease: A Multi-institutional Propensity Score-Matched Analysis [J].
Kumar, Ramesh K. ;
Sammon, Jesse D. ;
Kaczmarek, Bartosz F. ;
Khalifeh, Ali ;
Gorin, Michael A. ;
Sivarajan, Ganesh ;
Tanagho, Youssef S. ;
Bhayani, Sam B. ;
Stifelman, Michael D. ;
Allaf, Mohamad E. ;
Kaouk, Jihad H. ;
Rogers, Craig G. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2014, 65 (06) :1205-1210