Medical Abortion Provided by Nurse-Midwives or Physicians in a High Resource Setting: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

被引:24
作者
Sjostrom, Susanne [1 ]
Kallner, Helena Kopp [1 ,2 ]
Simeonova, Emilia [3 ]
Madestam, Andreas [4 ]
Gemzell-Danielsson, Kristina [1 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Karolinska Inst, Dept Womens & Childrens Hlth, Div Obstet & Gynecol, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Karolinska Inst, Dept Clin Sci, Danderyds Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Carey Sch Business, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Stockholm Univ, Dept Econ, Stockholm, Sweden
来源
PLOS ONE | 2016年 / 11卷 / 06期
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
ACTING REVERSIBLE CONTRACEPTION; UNINTENDED PREGNANCY; UNITED-STATES; POSTABORTION CONTRACEPTION; SAFE ABORTION; CARE; CHOICE; COHORT; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0158645
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objective The objective of the present study is to calculate the cost-effectiveness of early medical abortion performed by nurse-midwifes in comparison to physicians in a high resource setting where ultrasound dating is part of the protocol. Non-physician health care professionals have previously been shown to provide medical abortion as effectively and safely as physicians, but the cost-effectiveness of such task shifting remains to be established. Study design A cost effectiveness analysis was conducted based on data from a previously published randomized-controlled equivalence study including 1180 healthy women randomized to the standard procedure, early medical abortion provided by physicians, or the intervention, provision by nurse-midwifes. A 1.6% risk difference for efficacy defined as complete abortion without surgical interventions in favor of midwife provision was established which means that for every 100 procedures, the intervention treatment resulted in 1.6 fewer incomplete abortions needing surgical intervention than the standard treatment. The average direct and indirect costs and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were calculated. The study was conducted at a university hospital in Stockholm, Sweden. Results The average direct costs per procedure were EUR 45 for the intervention compared to EUR 58.3 for the standard procedure. Both the cost and the efficacy of the intervention were superior to the standard treatment resulting in a negative ICER at EUR -831 based on direct costs and EUR -1769 considering total costs per surgical intervention avoided. Conclusion Early medical abortion provided by nurse-midwives is more cost-effective than provision by physicians. This evidence provides clinicians and decision makers with an important tool that may influence policy and clinical practice and eventually increase numbers of abortion providers and reduce one barrier to women's access to safe abortion.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [21] Inefficiencies and High-Value Improvements in US Cervical Cancer Screening Practice A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
    Kim, Jane J.
    Campos, Nicole G.
    Sy, Stephen
    Burger, Emily A.
    Cuzick, Jack
    Castle, Philip E.
    Hunt, William C.
    Waxman, Alan
    Wheeler, Cosette M.
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2015, 163 (08) : 589 - +
  • [22] A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Postoperative Goal-Directed Therapy for High-Risk Surgical Patients
    Ebm, Claudia
    Cecconi, Maurizio
    Sutton, Les
    Rhodes, Andrew
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2014, 42 (05) : 1194 - 1203
  • [23] Hysterectomy with sentinel lymph node biopsy in the setting of pre-operative diagnosis of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia: A cost-effectiveness analysis
    Lim, Stephanie L.
    Moss, Haley A.
    Secord, Angeles Alvarez
    Lee, Paula S.
    Havrilesky, Laura J.
    Davidson, Brittany A.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2018, 151 (03) : 506 - 512
  • [24] Comparing the Air Medical Prehospital Triage Score With Current Practice for Triage of Injured Patients to Helicopter Emergency Medical Services A Cost-effectiveness Analysis
    Brown, Joshua B.
    Smith, Kenneth J.
    Gestring, Mark L.
    Rosengart, Matthew R.
    Billiar, Timothy R.
    Peitzman, Andrew B.
    Sperry, Jason L.
    Weissman, Joel S.
    JAMA SURGERY, 2018, 153 (03) : 261 - 268
  • [25] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Protected Carotid Artery Stent Placement Versus Endarterectomy in High-Risk Patients
    Maud, Alberto
    Vazquez, Gabriela
    Nyman, John A.
    Lakshminarayan, Kamakshi
    Anderson, David C.
    Qureshi, Adnan I.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2010, 17 (02) : 224 - 229
  • [26] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Perioperative Oral Management after Cancer Surgery and an Examination of the Reduction in Medical Costs Thereafter: A Multicenter Study
    Sekiya, Hideki
    Kurasawa, Yasuhiro
    Maruoka, Yutaka
    Mukohyama, Hitoshi
    Negishi, Akihide
    Shigematsu, Shiro
    Sugizaki, Junpei
    Ohashi, Masaru
    Hasegawa, Shiro
    Kobayashi, Yutaka
    Ueno, Masayuki
    Michiwaki, Yukihiro
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (14)
  • [27] The Ambulatory Medical Assistance (AMA) programme during active-phase treatment in patients with haematological malignancies: A cost-effectiveness analysis
    Michallet, Anne-Sophie
    Malartre, Stephanie
    Vignaud, Elodie
    Bocquet, Alexiane
    Sontag, Pascale
    Galvez, Christelle
    Blay, Jean-Yves
    Heudel, Pierre
    Vimont, Alexandre
    Blachier, Martin
    Ferrua, Marie
    Minvielle, Etienne
    Mir, Olivier
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2022, 31 (06)
  • [28] Cost-effectiveness analysis of doctor-pharmacist collaborative prescribing for venous thromboembolism in high risk surgical patients
    Hale, Andrew
    Merlo, Greg
    Nissen, Lisa
    Coombes, Ian
    Graves, Nicholas
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2018, 18
  • [29] Performance and Cost-Effectiveness of Computed Tomography Lung Cancer Screening Scenarios in a Population-Based Setting: A Microsimulation Modeling Analysis in Ontario, Canada
    ten Haaf, Kevin
    Tammemagi, Martin C.
    Bondy, Susan J.
    van der Aalst, Carlijn M.
    Gu, Sumei
    McGregor, S. Elizabeth
    Nicholas, Garth
    de Koning, Harry J.
    Paszat, Lawrence F.
    PLOS MEDICINE, 2017, 14 (02):
  • [30] Early cost-effectiveness analysis of screening for preeclampsia in nulliparous women: A modelling approach in European high-income settings
    Zakiyah, Neily
    Tuytten, Robin
    Baker, Philip N.
    Kenny, Louise C.
    Postma, Maarten J.
    van Asselt, Antoinette D., I
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (04):