Conservation tillage in Turkish dryland research

被引:11
|
作者
Avci, Muzaffer [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent Res Inst Field Crops, Dept Agron, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
dryland farming; summer fallow; erosion; stubble; straw; tillage; no-tillage; weed control;
D O I
10.1051/agro/2010022
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Central Anatolian soils have high risk of erosion, degradation and intensive cultivation. Consequently, they are in danger of exhausting their agricultural use unless conservation agricultural practices are adopted. Conservation agriculture is a key tool in sustainable production systems throughout the world and is developed around soil management technology that minimizes soil disturbance, maximizes the soil cover and promotes crop diversity to offer benefits to farmers and to the environment. It has been particularly effective at sustaining crop production in semi-arid rain-fed regions such as the Central Anatolian soils, where potential evaporation exceeds precipitation during most months of the year, dry farming is extensively practiced, water and wind erosion is common, and proper application of water- and soil-conserving tillage technology is critical. The area under plow expanded its limits as the number of tractors in agriculture dramatically increased in the 1960s. This is the starting point for inappropriate use of the agricultural land. The conservation agricultural technologies, therefore, are of utmost importance for the region. Common farmers' practices of a fallow-wheat system in the central plateau of Turkey are incompatible with the conservation agriculture concept. The objective of this review is to re-evaluate the performances of the partial and full conservation tillage practices previously tried in the region. This review reached the following conclusions: (1) agreeing with the conservation principles, fall tillage as a primary operation in the fallow phase was found to be useless compared with leaving the land without tillage; (2) therefore, much research has focused on spring tillage as a primary operation and employed conventional, semi-conservative and conservative methods. Results showed that the conventional system, in addition to being ecologically unfriendly, is unprofitable as compared with other conservation practices regarding the updated cost analysis; (3) similarly, tillage depth in primary spring tillage was determined to be shallower than the depths currently practiced by farmers, in agreement with the conservation principles; (4) fallow tillage operations in summer to create dust mulch for eliminating soil moisture loss did not increase the crop yields and soil moisture as compared with chemical fallow; (5) no-till fallow was similar to the conventional clean fallow system in terms of moisture and yield levels. However, no-tillage resulted in 50% reduction in the cost of tillage besides its ecologically-friendly effects; (6) the existing dryland agricultural systems in the plateau should be transformed into or changed toward sustainable systems, although further research is required on residue and stubble management, and integrated weed control methods to drill the soil with high amounts of residue on the field.
引用
收藏
页码:299 / 307
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The adoption of annual subsoiling as conservation tillage in dryland maize and wheat cultivation in northern China
    He Jin
    Li Hongwen
    Wang Xiaoyan
    McHugh, A. D.
    Li Wenying
    Gao Huanwen
    Kuhn, N. J.
    SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2007, 94 (02): : 493 - 502
  • [22] LEGUMES IN CONSERVATION TILLAGE SYSTEMS - A RESEARCH PERSPECTIVE
    POWER, JF
    FOLLETT, RF
    CARLSON, GE
    JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION, 1983, 38 (03) : 217 - 221
  • [23] Soil nutrient status and crop productivity after 6 years of conservation tillage in a subtropical dryland
    ur Rehman S.
    Ijaz S.S.
    Khan K.S.
    Ansar M.
    Hussain Q.
    Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2021, 14 (3)
  • [24] Participatory conservation tillage research: an experience with minimum tillage on an Ethiopian highland Vertisol
    Astatke, A
    Jabbar, M
    Tanner, D
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2003, 95 (2-3) : 401 - 415
  • [25] Dryland winter wheat response to conventional and conservation tillage systems in a chickpea - Wheat rotation in Iran
    Hemmat, A
    Eskandari, I
    ACTUAL TASKS ON AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING, 2003, 31 : 169 - 176
  • [26] Dryland No-Tillage Winter Wheat Response to Planter Type: Research articles
    Unger, P. W.
    Journal of Production Agriculture, 1996, 9 (02):
  • [27] Adaptability test and key technology research on conservation tillage
    Jia, Yanming
    Shang, Changqing
    Zhang, Zhenguo
    Nongye Gongcheng Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2002, 18 (01):
  • [28] A case for conservation tillage research in the arid zone of Nigeria
    Haque, MA
    DISCOVERY AND INNOVATION, 1998, 10 (1-2): : 100 - 105
  • [29] INFLUENCE OF CONSERVATION TILLAGE AND SOIL WATER CONTENT ON CROP YIELD IN DRYLAND COMPACTED ALFISOL OF CENTRAL CHILE
    Martinez G, Ingrid
    Ovalle, Carlos
    Del Pozo, Alejandro
    Uribe, Hamil
    Valderrama V, Natalia
    Prat, Christian
    Sandoval, Marco
    Fernandez, Fernando
    Zagal, Erick
    CHILEAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2011, 71 (04): : 615 - 622
  • [30] Biosolids and conservation tillage: Impacts on soil fungal communities in dryland wheat-fallow cropping systems
    Schlatter, Daniel C.
    Schillinger, William F.
    Bary, Andy I.
    Sharratt, Brenton
    Paulitz, Timothy C.
    SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 2017, 115 : 556 - 567