Abdominal Closure and the Risk of Incisional Hernia in Aneurysm Surgery - A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:20
|
作者
Nicolajsen, Chalotte W. [1 ]
Eldrup, Nikolaj [2 ]
机构
[1] Aalborg Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Aalborg Thrombosis Res Unit, Soendre Skovvej 15, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark
[2] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Dept Vasc Surg, Rigshosp, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
Abdominal aortic aneurysm; Abdominal closure; Incisional hernia; Open surgery; Review; AORTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY; RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL; MIDLINE INCISIONS; WALL HERNIA; TRANSPERITONEAL APPROACH; DOUBLE-BLIND; DISEASE; MESH; RETROPERITONEAL; REINFORCEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.07.041
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: Patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) have a high prevalence of incisional hernia following open repair. The choice of incision and closure technique has a significant impact on this postoperative complication. Multiple techniques exist, as well as various comparative analyses, but clinical consensus is lacking. The objective was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of AAA laparotomy and closure technique and the risk of incisional hernia development. Methods: The systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. A literature search of all original research published until January 2019 was made. Outcome measures were surgical approach, closure technique, hernia rates, length of follow up, and method of hernia recognition. Groups were divided according to method of abdominal incision and closure technique. Differences in outcome between closure techniques were expressed as risk ratios with 95% confidence interval (CI) using a random effects model. Results: Fifteen studies were included with a cumulative cohort of between 388 and 3 399 patients compared in each group. Abdominal closure with a suture to wound length ratio of more than 4:1 compared with less than 4:1, RR 0.42 (95% CI 0.27-0.65), and abdominal closure with mesh compared with without mesh augmentation, RR 0.24 (95% CI 0.10-0.60) reduced the risk of incisional hernia. There were no significant differences in incisional hernia rate between transverse abdominal incision vs. vertical midline incision, RR 0.57 (95% CI 0.31-1.06) and between midline transperitoneal vs. all retroperitoneal incisions, RR 1.19 (95% CI 0.54-2.61). Conclusion: Choice of abdominal closure technique after aneurysm surgery impacts the risk of developing incisional hernia. The use of a supportive mesh significantly reduces the risk of incisional hernia in vertical midline incisions. The same is true if a suture to wound ratio of more than 4:1 is used.
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 236
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Prevention of incisional hernia at the site of stoma closure with different reinforcing mesh types: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Peltrini, Roberto
    Imperatore, Nicola
    Altieri, Gaia
    Castiglioni, Simone
    Di Nuzzo, Maria Michela
    Grimaldi, Luciano
    D'Ambra, Michele
    Lionetti, Ruggero
    Bracale, Umberto
    Corcione, Francesco
    HERNIA, 2021, 25 (03) : 639 - 648
  • [22] Systematic review and meta-analysis of risk factors for Mesh infection following Abdominal Wall Hernia Repair Surgery
    Quiroga-Centeno, Andrea Carolina
    Quiroga-Centeno, Carlos Augusto
    Guerrero-Macias, Silvia
    Navas-Quintero, Orlando
    Gomez-Ochoa, Sergio Alejandro
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 224 (01): : 239 - 246
  • [23] A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Enhanced Recovery for Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Surgery
    Docherty, Jack
    Morgan-Bates, Kersten
    Stather, Philip
    VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2022, 56 (07) : 655 - 664
  • [24] Incisional hernia formation in hepatobiliary surgery using transverse and hybrid incisions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Davey, S.
    Rajaretnem, N.
    Harji, D.
    Rees, J.
    Messenger, D.
    Smart, N. J.
    Pathak, S.
    ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2020, 102 (09) : 663 - 671
  • [25] Incisional hernia formation in hepatobiliary surgery using transverse and hybrid incisions; a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Davey, Simon
    Rajaretnem, Niroshini
    Harji, Deena
    Messenger, David
    Smart, Neil
    Pathak, Samir
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 106 : 22 - 22
  • [26] Incidence of incisional hernia in the specimen extraction site for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lee, Lawrence
    Abou-Khalil, Maria
    Liberman, Sender
    Boutros, Marylise
    Fried, Gerald M.
    Feldman, Liane S.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2017, 31 (12): : 5083 - 5093
  • [27] Incidence of incisional hernia in the specimen extraction site for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lawrence Lee
    Maria Abou-Khalil
    Sender Liberman
    Marylise Boutros
    Gerald M. Fried
    Liane S. Feldman
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2017, 31 : 5083 - 5093
  • [28] Risk factors for ischaemic colitis after surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm: a systematic review and observational meta-analysis
    Lee, Matthew J.
    Daniels, Sarah L.
    Drake, Thomas M.
    Adam, Ian J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2016, 31 (07) : 1273 - 1281
  • [29] Risk factors for ischaemic colitis after surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm: a systematic review and observational meta-analysis
    Matthew J. Lee
    Sarah L. Daniels
    Thomas M. Drake
    Ian J. Adam
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2016, 31 : 1273 - 1281
  • [30] A systematic review of laparoscopic versus open abdominal incisional hernia repair, with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Al Chalabi, Hasanin
    Larkin, John
    Mehigan, Brian
    McCormick, Paul
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 20 : 65 - 74