The effect of a decision aid on informed decision-making in the era of non-invasive prenatal testing: a randomised controlled trial

被引:48
作者
Beulen, Lean [1 ]
van den Berg, Michelle [1 ]
Faas, Brigitte H. W. [2 ]
Feenstra, Ilse [2 ]
Hageman, Michiel [3 ]
van Vugt, John M. G. [1 ]
Bekker, Mireille N. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Human Genet, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] PATIENT Fdn, The Hague, Netherlands
[4] Univ Utrecht, Med Ctr, Wilhelmina Childrens Hosp Birth Ctr, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
DOWN-SYNDROME; PREGNANT-WOMEN; CONFLICT SCALE; CHOICE; INFORMATION; VALIDATION; POPULATION; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1038/ejhg.2016.39
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Early in pregnancy women and their partners face the complex decision on whether or not to participate in prenatal testing for fetal chromosomal abnormalities. Several studies show that the majority of pregnant women currently do not make informed decisions regarding prenatal testing. As the range of prenatal tests is expanding due to the development of new techniques such as non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), autonomous reproductive decision-making is increasingly challenging. In this study, a randomised controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the effect of a web-based multimedia decision aid on decision-making regarding prenatal testing. The decision aid provided both written and audiovisual information on prenatal tests currently available, that is, prenatal screening by first-trimester combined testing, NIPT and invasive diagnostic testing through chorionic villus sampling or amniocentesis. Furthermore, it contained values clarification exercises encouraging pregnant women to reflect on the potential harms and benefits of having prenatal tests performed. The use of the decision aid improved informed decision-making regarding prenatal testing. Of pregnant women allocated to the intervention group (n = 130) 82.3% made an informed choice compared with 66.4% of women in the control group (n = 131), P = 0.004. As the vast majority of pregnant women made decisions consistent with their attitudes towards having prenatal testing performed, this improvement in informed decision-making could be attributed mainly to an increase in decision-relevant knowledge. This study shows that the implementation of a web-based multimedia decision aid directly facilitates the ultimate goal of prenatal testing for fetal chromosomal abnormalities, which is enabling informed autonomous reproductive choice.
引用
收藏
页码:1409 / 1416
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Measuring informed choice in population-based reproductive genetic screening: a systematic review [J].
Ames, Alice Grace ;
Metcalfe, Sylvia Ann ;
Archibald, Alison Dalton ;
Duncan, Rony Emily ;
Emery, Jon .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2015, 23 (01) :8-21
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, COCHRANE DATABASE SY
[3]   Women's and healthcare professionals' preferences for prenatal testing: a discrete choice experiment [J].
Beulen, Lean ;
Grutters, Janneke P. C. ;
Faas, Brigitte H. W. ;
Feenstra, Ilse ;
Groenewoud, Hans ;
van Vugt, John M. G. ;
Bekker, Mireille N. .
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2015, 35 (06) :549-557
[4]   Audiovisual information affects informed choice and experience of information in antenatal Down syndrome screening - A randomized controlled trial [J].
Bjorklund, Ulla ;
Marsk, Anna ;
Levin, Charlotta ;
Ohman, Susanne Georgsson .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2012, 86 (03) :390-395
[5]   Validation of a decision regret scale [J].
Brehaut, JC ;
O'Connor, AM ;
Wood, TJ ;
Hack, TF ;
Siminoff, L ;
Gordon, E ;
Feldman-Stewart, D .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2003, 23 (04) :281-292
[6]   Advances in prenatal screening: the ethical dimension [J].
de Jong, Antina ;
Dondorp, Wybo J. ;
Frints, Suzanna G. M. ;
de Die-Smulders, Christine E. M. ;
de Wert, Guido M. W. R. .
NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2011, 12 (09) :657-663
[7]   Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process [J].
Elwyn, Glyn ;
O'Connor, Annette ;
Stacey, Dawn ;
Volk, Robert ;
Edwards, Adrian ;
Coulter, Angela ;
Thomson, Richard ;
Barrat, Alexandra ;
Butow, Phyllis ;
Barry, Michael ;
Mulley, Albert G. ;
Sepucha, Karen ;
Bernstein, Steven ;
Clarke, Aileen ;
Entwistle, Vikki ;
Feldman-Stewart, Deb ;
Holmes-Rovner, Margaret ;
Llewellyn-Thomas, Hilary ;
Moumjid, Nora ;
Ruland, Cornelia ;
Sykes, Alan ;
Whelan, Tim .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 333 (7565) :417-419
[8]   Assessing the Quality of Decision Support Technologies Using the International Patient Decision Aid Standards instrument (IPDASi) [J].
Elwyn, Glyn ;
O'Connor, Annette M. ;
Bennett, Carol ;
Newcombe, Robert G. ;
Politi, Mary ;
Durand, Marie-Anne ;
Drake, Elizabeth ;
Joseph-Williams, Natalie ;
Khangura, Sara ;
Saarimaki, Anton ;
Sivell, Stephanie ;
Stiel, Mareike ;
Bernstein, Steven J. ;
Col, Nananda ;
Coulter, Angela ;
Eden, Karen ;
Haerter, Martin ;
Rovner, Margaret Holmes ;
Moumjid, Nora ;
Stacey, Dawn ;
Thomson, Richard ;
Whelan, Tim ;
van der Weijden, Trudy ;
Edwards, Adrian .
PLOS ONE, 2009, 4 (03)
[9]   Prenatal genetic care: debates and considerations of the past, present and future [J].
Faas, Brigitte H. W. .
EXPERT OPINION ON BIOLOGICAL THERAPY, 2015, 15 (08) :1101-1105
[10]   Ethnic differences in informed decision-making about prenatal screening for Down's syndrome [J].
Fransen, Mirjam P. ;
Essink-Bot, Marie-Louise ;
Vogel, Ineke ;
Mackenbach, Johan P. ;
Steegers, Eric A. P. ;
Wildschut, Hajo I. J. .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2010, 64 (03) :262-268