What we owe the author: Rethinking editorial peer review

被引：7

作者：

Crigger, NJ ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Cent Florida, Sch Nursing, Orlando, FL 32816 USA

来源：

NURSING ETHICS | 1998年 / 5卷 / 05期

关键词：

beneficence; editorial peer review; epistemology; ethics; impartiality; universalizability;

D O I：

10.1177/096973309800500508

中图分类号：

B82 [伦理学（道德学）];

学科分类号：

摘要：

Editorial peer reviewers play an important role in shaping the direction of knowledge growth of their discipline. Recent concern over reports of peer review misconduct has led some to advocate the establishment of a code of ethics for peer reviewers. Such a code should include guidelines for the discipline and for society at large, but it should also contain guidelines for the authors whose manuscripts are reviewed. Peer reviewers have a special obligation to show beneficence and fairness or impartiality towards the authors for whom they review. The practical application of these two ethical concepts is discussed.

引用

页码：451 / 458

页数：8

共 20 条

[1]

[Anonymous], 1981, MORAL THINKING

[2]

BATTIN MP, 1994, PROF ETHICS, V3, P5

[3]

Beauchamp T., 2009, Principles of biomedical ethics, V6

[4]

Brandt R.B., 1992, MORALITY UTILITARIAN

[5] ARTIFICIAL DAMAGE TECHNIQUES FOR LOW-VELOCITY IMPACT IN CARBON-FIBER COMPOSITES [J].

CLARKE, MP ;

PAVIER, MJ .

COMPOSITE STRUCTURES, 1993, 25 (1-4) :113-120

[6] ETHICS AND IMPARTIALITY [J].

COTTINGHAM, J .

PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES, 1983, 43 (01) :83-99

[7]

DAVIS M, 1995, PROF ETHICS, V4, P49

[8]

Davis Michael, 1992, Prof Ethics, V1, P179

[9]

FONDILLER SH, 1994, NURS HEALTH CARE, V15, P142

[10]

Gert Bernard., 1997, BIOETHICS RETURN FUN

← 1 2 →