Self-Testing as an Invaluable Tool in Fighting the COVID-19 Pandemic

被引:41
|
作者
Goggolidou, Paraskevi [1 ,2 ]
Hodges-Mameletzis, Ioannis [2 ]
Purewal, Satvinder [3 ]
Karakoula, Aikaterini [2 ]
Warr, Tracy [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wolverhampton, Fac Sci & Engn, Wulfruna St, Wolverhampton WV1 1LY, England
[2] Univ Wolverhampton, Res Inst Healthcare Sci, Wolverhampton, England
[3] Univ Wolverhampton, Fac Educ Hlth & Wellbeing, Wolverhampton, England
关键词
public health policy; communicable diseases; COVID-19; epidemiology; public health; self-testing;
D O I
10.1177/21501327211047782
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives: The United Kingdom and a number of European Union countries are offering and distributing rapid antigen detection tests (RADTs) for self-test use to detect SARS-CoV-2. For instance, Greece, in the midst of its third wave of COVID-19, announced the provision of RADTs for self-testing through retail pharmacies. With the aim to determine the acceptability and feasibility of COVID-19 self-testing, we ran a cross-sectional survey on residents of Greece and Cyprus, aged over 18 years. Methods: An online survey using the JISC platform was distributed to 1000 individuals who completed the survey anonymously. Data was collated and analyzed for complete responses by chi-squared and logistic regression analyses. Results: A total of 248 complete responses were obtained, with balanced gender distribution and particular demographics representative of the 2 countries. The majority of participants (79%; n = 196) reported willingness to self-test and the remaining individuals reported no (10.5%; n = 26) or don't know (10.5%; n = 26). Being a university graduate significantly predicted the likelihood of being willing to self-test (odds ratio [OR] = 3.455, P < .001). Pearson Chi-square test found significant differences between university graduates versus non-graduates on the type of COVID-19 test preferred (chi(2) = 8.95, df = 3, P < .03); graduates were more likely to prefer saliva testing and less likely to prefer the finger prick test than non-graduates. Conclusions: Our survey data evidences the acceptability of home-based self-testing, with a preference for saliva as choice of biological material for sampling. A number of factors, such as accessible reporting, contact tracing infrastructures, central registration, and validation for the implementation of different RADTs need to be taken collectively into consideration before self-testing can be universally and reliably scaled up.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Incentives, lockdown, and testing: from Thucydides' analysis to the COVID-19 pandemic
    Hubert, Emma
    Mastrolia, Thibaut
    Possamai, Dylan
    Warin, Xavier
    JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL BIOLOGY, 2022, 84 (05)
  • [42] Lessons Learnt From the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Stenseth, Nils Chr
    Dharmarajan, Guha
    Li, Ruiyun
    Shi, Zheng-Li
    Yang, Ruifu
    Gao, George F.
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 9
  • [43] COVID-19 TestNorm: A tool to normalize COVID-19 testing names to LOINC codes
    Dong, Xiao
    Li, Jianfu
    Soysal, Ekin
    Bian, Jiang
    DuVall, Scott L.
    Hanchrow, Elizabeth
    Liu, Hongfang
    Lynch, Kristine E.
    Matheny, Michael
    Natarajan, Karthik
    Ohno-Machado, Lucila
    Pakhomov, Serguei
    Reeves, Ruth Madeleine
    Sitapati, Amy M.
    Abhyankar, Swapna
    Cullen, Theresa
    Deckard, Jami
    Jiang, Xiaoqian
    Murphy, Robert
    Xu, Hua
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2020, 27 (09) : 1437 - 1442
  • [44] Psychiatric Epidemiology During the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Eisenberg-Guyot, Jerzy
    Presskreischer, Rachel
    Pamplin II, John R.
    CURRENT EPIDEMIOLOGY REPORTS, 2024, 11 (02) : 120 - 130
  • [45] Implementing a pilot study of COVID-19 self-testing in high-risk populations and remote locations: results and lessons learnt
    Elena Marbán-Castro
    Vladimer Getia
    Maia Alkhazashvili
    Maia Japaridze
    Ia Jikia
    Berra Erkosar
    Paula Del Rey-Puech
    Guillermo Z. Martínez-Pérez
    Paata Imnadze
    Amiran Gamkrelidze
    Olga Denisiuk
    Elena Ivanova Reipold
    Sonjelle Shilton
    BMC Public Health, 24
  • [46] The “Pandemic” of Disinformation in COVID-19
    Fabio Tagliabue
    Luca Galassi
    Pierpaolo Mariani
    SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine, 2020, 2 (9) : 1287 - 1289
  • [47] The formidable task of fighting COVID-19 in Sudan
    Elhadi, Yasir Ahmed Mohammed
    Adebisi, Yusuff Adebayo
    Hassan, Khlood Fathi
    Mohammed, Salma Elmukashfi Eltaher
    Lin, Xu
    Lucero-Prisno, Don Eliseo, III
    PAN AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 35 : 1 - 5
  • [48] Geographies of the COVID-19 pandemic
    Rose-Redwood, Reuben
    Kitchin, Rob
    Apostolopoulou, Elia
    Rickards, Lauren
    Blackman, Tyler
    Crampton, Jeremy
    Rossi, Ugo
    Buckley, Michelle
    DIALOGUES IN HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 10 (02) : 97 - 106
  • [49] At-Home Specimen Self-Collection and Self-Testing for Sexually Transmitted Infection Screening Demand Accelerated by the COVID-19 Pandemic: a Review of Laboratory Implementation Issues
    Kersh, Ellen N.
    Shukla, Mayur
    Raphael, Brian H.
    Habel, Melissa
    Park, Ina
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2021, 59 (11)
  • [50] Malaria Epidemiology and COVID-19 Pandemic: Are They Interrelated?
    Prabhu, Sowmya R.
    Ware, Akshay P.
    Saadi, Abdul Vahab
    Brand, Angela
    Ghosh, Susanta K.
    Kamath, Asha
    Satyamoorthy, Kapaettu
    OMICS-A JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE BIOLOGY, 2022, 26 (04) : 179 - 188