Self-Testing as an Invaluable Tool in Fighting the COVID-19 Pandemic

被引:41
|
作者
Goggolidou, Paraskevi [1 ,2 ]
Hodges-Mameletzis, Ioannis [2 ]
Purewal, Satvinder [3 ]
Karakoula, Aikaterini [2 ]
Warr, Tracy [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wolverhampton, Fac Sci & Engn, Wulfruna St, Wolverhampton WV1 1LY, England
[2] Univ Wolverhampton, Res Inst Healthcare Sci, Wolverhampton, England
[3] Univ Wolverhampton, Fac Educ Hlth & Wellbeing, Wolverhampton, England
关键词
public health policy; communicable diseases; COVID-19; epidemiology; public health; self-testing;
D O I
10.1177/21501327211047782
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives: The United Kingdom and a number of European Union countries are offering and distributing rapid antigen detection tests (RADTs) for self-test use to detect SARS-CoV-2. For instance, Greece, in the midst of its third wave of COVID-19, announced the provision of RADTs for self-testing through retail pharmacies. With the aim to determine the acceptability and feasibility of COVID-19 self-testing, we ran a cross-sectional survey on residents of Greece and Cyprus, aged over 18 years. Methods: An online survey using the JISC platform was distributed to 1000 individuals who completed the survey anonymously. Data was collated and analyzed for complete responses by chi-squared and logistic regression analyses. Results: A total of 248 complete responses were obtained, with balanced gender distribution and particular demographics representative of the 2 countries. The majority of participants (79%; n = 196) reported willingness to self-test and the remaining individuals reported no (10.5%; n = 26) or don't know (10.5%; n = 26). Being a university graduate significantly predicted the likelihood of being willing to self-test (odds ratio [OR] = 3.455, P < .001). Pearson Chi-square test found significant differences between university graduates versus non-graduates on the type of COVID-19 test preferred (chi(2) = 8.95, df = 3, P < .03); graduates were more likely to prefer saliva testing and less likely to prefer the finger prick test than non-graduates. Conclusions: Our survey data evidences the acceptability of home-based self-testing, with a preference for saliva as choice of biological material for sampling. A number of factors, such as accessible reporting, contact tracing infrastructures, central registration, and validation for the implementation of different RADTs need to be taken collectively into consideration before self-testing can be universally and reliably scaled up.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Are Kenyans Likely to Use COVID-19 Self-Testing Kits? Results From a Cross-Sectional Survey
    Manguro, Griffins
    Shilton, Sonjelle
    Omenda, Sharon
    Owira, Patrica
    Batheja, Deepshikha
    Banerji, Abhik
    Chabeda, Sophie Vusha
    Temmerman, Marleen
    Jako, Walter
    Ndungu, Joseph
    Luchters, Stanley
    Reipold, Elena Ivanova
    Martinez-Perez, Guillermo Z.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 67
  • [22] Acceptance of a COVID-19 Vaccine in Japan during the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Machida, Masaki
    Nakamura, Itaru
    Kojima, Takako
    Saito, Reiko
    Nakaya, Tomoki
    Hanibuchi, Tomoya
    Takamiya, Tomoko
    Odagiri, Yuko
    Fukushima, Noritoshi
    Kikuchi, Hiroyuki
    Amagasa, Shiho
    Watanabe, Hidehiro
    Inoue, Shigeru
    VACCINES, 2021, 9 (03) : 1 - 11
  • [23] Industry 4.0 technologies and their applications in fighting COVID-19 pandemic
    Javaid, Mohd
    Haleem, Abid
    Vaishya, Raju
    Bahl, Shashi
    Suman, Rajiv
    Vaish, Abhishek
    DIABETES & METABOLIC SYNDROME-CLINICAL RESEARCH & REVIEWS, 2020, 14 (04) : 419 - 422
  • [24] A computational tool for trend analysis and forecast of the COVID-19 pandemic
    Paiva, Henrique Mohallem
    Afonso, Rubens Junqueira Magalhaes
    Caldeira, Fabiana Mara Scarpelli de Lima Alvarenga
    Velasquez, Ester de Andrade
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2021, 105
  • [25] Rapid and Sensitive Diagnosis of COVID-19 Using an Electricity-Free Self-Testing System
    Li, Sheng
    Guo, Wenlong
    Xiao, Minmin
    Chen, Yulin
    Luo, Xinyi
    Xu, Wenfei
    Zhou, Jianhua
    Wang, Jiasi
    BIOSENSORS-BASEL, 2023, 13 (02):
  • [26] Fighting COVID-19
    Campos, D. M. O.
    Oliveira, C. B. S.
    Andrade, J. M. A.
    Oliveira, J. I. N.
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF BIOLOGY, 2020, 80 (03) : 698 - 701
  • [27] Models and muddles in the COVID-19 pandemic
    Nyabadza, Farai
    Broadbent, Alex
    Harley, Charis
    Ade-Ibijola, Abejide
    Momoniat, Ebrahim
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, 2021, 117 (9-10) : 8 - 11
  • [28] Self-testing for COVID-19 in Durban and Eastern Cape, South Africa: a qualitative inquiry targeting decision-takers
    Brumwell, Amanda N.
    Babatunde, Gbotemi B.
    Shilton, Sonjelle
    Tso, Jade
    Wilson, Michael W.
    Xulu, Noeline
    Adam, Jamila K.
    Marks, Monique M.
    Martinez-Perez, Guillermo Z.
    CONTEMPORARY SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2022, 17 (05) : 450 - 467
  • [29] Is fighting against COVID-19 enough?
    Kofler, Walter
    Glazachev, Oleg S.
    Lyshol, Heidi
    Tellnes, Gunnar
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 49 (01) : 9 - 13
  • [30] Fighting Covid-19 Pandemic: Analysis of the Swedish Model vs. Lockdown Model
    Turkistani, Fatema
    Bin Sawad, Aseel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE SCIENCE AND PHARMA RESEARCH, 2021, 11 (04): : 70 - 76