Environmental policy when consumers value conformity

被引:15
作者
Ulph, Alistair [1 ,2 ]
Ulph, David [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Sch Social Sci, Econ, Manchester, Lancs, England
[2] Univ Manchester, Sustainable Consumpt Inst, Manchester, Lancs, England
[3] Univ St Andrews, Sch Econ & Finance, Econ, St Andrews, Fife, Scotland
关键词
Desire for conformity; Participation-consistent consumption interval; Distribution of types; Existence of equilibrium consumption norms; Policy implications; SOCIAL NORMS; THRESHOLD MODELS; CONSUMPTION; EVOLUTION; HAPPINESS; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.jeem.2018.09.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We present a model of consumer behaviour when consumers value conformity and examine the implications for environmental policy. The model shares a feature set out in Dasgupta et al. (2016) of having a structure of preferences for conformity which induces a mass of consumers to adhere exactly to a norm level of consumption (clumping). However we extend our previous analysis by analysing the conditions for the existence and potential uniqueness of consumption norms. In doing so we introduce threshold effects whereby individuals adhere to a norm only if sufficiently many others do so. Taken together these have striking implications for environmental policy in the case where the norm good generates pollution emissions. Clumping means many individuals will not change behaviour unless the norm changes while threshold effects plus clumping means that it may be hard to change a norm. We show that the use of Pigovian taxes to control behaviour may be either ineffective or welfare reducing, and that the optimal Pigovian tax will work only if it is above some threshold level. There are parameter values for which quantity-based injunctive policies raise welfare relative to no intervention while optimal Pigovian taxes would lower welfare. Crown Copyright (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Recycling: Social norms and warm-glow revisited [J].
Abbott, Andrew ;
Nandeibam, Shasikanta ;
O'Shea, Lucy .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2013, 90 :10-18
[2]   Economics and identity [J].
Akerlof, GA ;
Kranton, RE .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2000, 115 (03) :715-753
[3]   Social norms and energy conservation [J].
Allcott, Hunt .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2011, 95 (9-10) :1082-1095
[4]   Conspicuous Consumption, Inconspicuous Leisure* [J].
Arrow, Kenneth J. ;
Dasgupta, Partha S. .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2009, 119 (541) :F497-F516
[5]   AN EVOLUTIONARY APPROACH TO NORMS [J].
AXELROD, R .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1986, 80 (04) :1095-1111
[6]   What sustains social norms and how they evolve? The case of tipping [J].
Azar, OH .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2004, 54 (01) :49-64
[7]  
Bauman Z., 2001, Thinking Sociologically
[8]  
Bennett Tony., 2009, Culture, Class Distinction, DOI [10.4324/9780203930571, DOI 10.4324/9780203930571]
[9]   A THEORY OF CONFORMITY [J].
BERNHEIM, BD .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1994, 102 (05) :841-877
[10]   Well-being over time in Britain and the USA [J].
Blanchflower, DG ;
Oswald, AJ .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2004, 88 (7-8) :1359-1386