Can breast MRI accurately exclude malignancy in mammographic architectural distortion?

被引:28
作者
Amitai, Yoav [1 ]
Scaranelo, Anabel [1 ]
Menes, Tehillah S. [2 ]
Fleming, Rachel [1 ]
Kulkarni, Supriya [1 ]
Ghai, Sandeep [1 ]
Freitas, Vivianne [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Joint Dept Med Imaging, Univ Hlth Network, Sinai Hlth Syst,Womens Coll Hosp, 610 Univ Ave, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
[2] Tel Aviv Univ, Tel Aviv Sourasky Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Sackler Sch Med, 6 Weizmann St, IL-64239 Tel Aviv, Israel
关键词
Architectural distortion; Radial scar; Problem solving; Breast neoplasm; Mammography; CORE NEEDLE-BIOPSY; CANCER; TOMOSYNTHESIS; UTILITY; WOMEN; MANAGEMENT; DIAGNOSIS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-019-06586-x
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of problem-solving breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in excluding malignancy in a cohort of patients diagnosed with mammographic architectural distortion (MAD). Methods The Institutional Review Board approved the study. Imaging database with 40,245 breast MRIs done between January 2008 and September 2018 was retrospectively reviewed. The study included all exams considered problem-solving MRI for MAD. Two radiologists reviewed the imaging data. Outcome was determined by the pathology results of biopsy/surgical excision or at least 1 year of clinical and radiological follow-up. Predictors for malignancy were examined, and appropriate statistical tests were applied. Results One hundred seventy-five patients (median age 53 years) fulfilled the inclusion criteria and formed the study cohort. No cancers were diagnosed in 106 patients with a negative MRI. Out of 69 women with positive MRI findings, 48 (70%) had benign outcome defined either by pathology result or by negative follow-up, and 21 (30%) yielded malignancy. Malignancy was significantly associated with positive MRI (p < 0.001) and older age (p = 0.014). Falsely positive MRIs were frequently found in women with radial scars. The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, and overall accuracy of breast MRI were 100% (95% CI 84 to 100%), 68% (CI 61 to 76%), 100% (CI 95 to 100%), 30% (CI 26 to 36%), and 73% (95% CI 66-79), respectively. Conclusion A negative breast MRI in patients with MAD was reliable in excluding malignancy in this cohort and may have a role as a precision medicine tool for avoiding unnecessary interventions.
引用
收藏
页码:2751 / 2760
页数:10
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Architectural Distortion on Mammography: Correlation With Pathologic Outcomes and Predictors of Malignancy
    Bahl, Manisha
    Baker, Jay A.
    Kinsey, Emily N.
    Ghate, Sujata V.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2015, 205 (06) : 1339 - 1345
  • [2] Impact of aging on the biology of breast cancer
    Benz, Christopher C.
    [J]. CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2008, 66 (01) : 65 - 74
  • [3] Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer
    Berg, WA
    Gutierrez, L
    NessAiver, MS
    Carter, WB
    Bhargavan, M
    Lewis, RS
    Ioffe, OB
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2004, 233 (03) : 830 - 849
  • [4] Boba M, 2011, POL J RADIOL, V76, P25
  • [5] Anatomical-radiological correlations: Architectural distortions
    Boyer, B.
    Russ, E.
    [J]. DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL IMAGING, 2014, 95 (02) : 134 - 140
  • [6] Screening interval breast cancers: Mammographic features and prognostic factors
    Burrell, HC
    Sibbering, DM
    Wilson, ARM
    Pinder, SE
    Evans, AJ
    Yeoman, LJ
    Elston, CW
    Ellis, IO
    Blamey, RW
    Robertson, JFR
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1996, 199 (03) : 811 - 817
  • [7] Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study
    Ciatto, Stefano
    Houssami, Nehmat
    Bernardi, Daniela
    Caumo, Francesca
    Pellegrini, Marco
    Brunelli, Silvia
    Tuttobene, Paola
    Bricolo, Paola
    Fanto, Carmine
    Valentini, Marvi
    Montemezzi, Stefania
    Macaskill, Petra
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2013, 14 (07) : 583 - 589
  • [8] Architectural distortion and diagnostic difficulties
    Digabel-Chabay, C
    Allioux, C
    Labbe-Devilhers, C
    Meingan, P
    Couprie, MR
    [J]. JOURNAL DE RADIOLOGIE, 2004, 85 (12): : 2099 - 2106
  • [9] Dorrius MD, 2010, CANC IMAGING, V2010, P10
  • [10] DOrsi CJ, 2013, ACR BI-RADS Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System