FDG-PET/CT lymph node staging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophageal-gastric junction

被引:7
作者
Fencl, Pavel [1 ]
Belohlavek, Otakar [1 ]
Harustiak, Tomas [2 ,3 ]
Zemanova, Milada [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Na Homolce, PET Ctr, Roentgenova 2, Prague 15030 5, Czech Republic
[2] Charles Univ Prague, Fac Med 1, Surg Clin 3, V Uvalu 84, Prague 15006 5, Czech Republic
[3] Univ Hosp Motol, V Uvalu 84, Prague 15006 5, Czech Republic
[4] Charles Univ Prague, Fac Med 1, Clin Oncol, U Nemocnice 2, Prague 12808 2, Czech Republic
[5] Gen Teaching Hosp, U Nemocnice 2, Prague 12808 2, Czech Republic
关键词
FDG-PET/CT; Esophageal adenocarcinoma; Nodal staging; Accuracy; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASONOGRAPHY; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; CANCER; METASTASIS; CARCINOMA; THERAPY; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1007/s00261-016-0820-x
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The aim of the analysis was to assess the accuracy of various FDG-PET/CT parameters in staging lymph nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In this prospective study, 74 patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophageal-gastric junction were examined by FDG-PET/CT in the course of their neoadjuvant chemotherapy given before surgical treatment. Data from the final FDG-PET/CT examinations were compared with the histology from the surgical specimens (gold standard). The accuracy was calculated for four FDG-PET/CT parameters: (1) hypermetabolic nodes, (2) large nodes, (3) large-and-medium large nodes, and (4) hypermetabolic or large nodes. In 74 patients, a total of 1540 lymph nodes were obtained by surgery, and these were grouped into 287 regions according to topographic origin. Five hundred and two nodes were imaged by FDG-PET/CT and were grouped into these same regions for comparison. In the analysis, (1) hypermetabolic nodes, (2) large nodes, (3) large-and-medium large nodes, and (4) hypermetabolic or large nodes identified metastases in particular regions with sensitivities of 11.6%, 2.9%, 21.7%, and 13.0%, respectively; specificity was 98.6%, 94.5%, 74.8%, and 93.6%, respectively. The best accuracy of 77.7% reached the parameter of hypermetabolic nodes. Accuracy decreased to 62.0% when also smaller nodes (medium-large) were taken for the parameter of metastases. FDG-PET/CT proved low sensitivity and high specificity. Low sensitivity was based on low detection rate (32.6%) when compared nodes imaged by FDG-PET/CT to nodes found by surgery, and in inability to detect micrometastases. Sensitivity increased when also medium-large LNs were taken for positive, but specificity and accuracy decreased.
引用
收藏
页码:2089 / 2094
页数:6
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   FDG PET and PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour PET imaging: version 1.0 [J].
Boellaard, Ronald ;
O'Doherty, Mike J. ;
Weber, Wolfgang A. ;
Mottaghy, Felix M. ;
Lonsdale, Markus N. ;
Stroobants, Sigrid G. ;
Oyen, Wim J. G. ;
Kotzerke, Joerg ;
Hoekstra, Otto S. ;
Pruim, Jan ;
Marsden, Paul K. ;
Tatsch, Klaus ;
Hoekstra, Corneline J. ;
Visser, Eric P. ;
Arends, Bertjan ;
Verzijlbergen, Fred J. ;
Zijlstra, Josee M. ;
Comans, Emile F. I. ;
Lammertsma, Adriaan A. ;
Paans, Anne M. ;
Willemsen, Antoon T. ;
Beyer, Thomas ;
Bockisch, Andreas ;
Schaefer-Prokop, Cornelia ;
Delbeke, Dominique ;
Baum, Richard P. ;
Chiti, Arturo ;
Krause, Bernd J. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2010, 37 (01) :181-200
[2]   The accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography with fine-needle aspiration, integrated positron emission tomography with computed tomography, and computed tomography in restaging patients with esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy [J].
Cerfolio, RJ ;
Bryant, AS ;
Ohja, B ;
Bartolucci, AA ;
Eloubeidi, MA .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2005, 129 (06) :1232-1241
[3]   Lymph Node Metastases in Esophageal Carcinoma: An Endoscopist's View [J].
Cho, Jin Woong ;
Choi, Suck Chei ;
Jang, Jae Young ;
Shin, Sung Kwan ;
Choi, Kee Don ;
Lee, Jun Haeng ;
Kim, Sang Gyun ;
Sung, Jae Kyu ;
Jeon, Seong Woo ;
Choi, Il Ju ;
Kim, Gwang Ha ;
Jee, Sam Ryong ;
Lee, Wan Sik ;
Jung, Hwoon-Yong .
CLINICAL ENDOSCOPY, 2014, 47 (06) :523-529
[4]  
Cordin J, 2010, RECENT RESULTS CANC, V182, P73, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-70579-6_6
[5]   Clinical Staging of Patients with Early Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Does FDG-PET/CT Have a Role? [J].
Cuellar, Sonia L. Betancourt ;
Carter, Brett W. ;
Macapinlac, Homer A. ;
Ajani, Jaffer A. ;
Komaki, Ritsuko ;
Welsh, James W. ;
Lee, Jeffrey H. ;
Swisher, Stephen G. ;
Correa, Arlene M. ;
Erasmus, Jeremy J. ;
Hofstetter, Wayne L. .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2014, 9 (08) :1202-1206
[6]   Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer [J].
Cunningham, David ;
Allum, William H. ;
Stenning, Sally P. ;
Thompson, Jeremy N. ;
Van de Velde, Cornelis J. H. ;
Nicolson, Marianne ;
Scarffe, J. Howard ;
Lofts, Fiona J. ;
Falk, Stephen J. ;
Iveson, Timothy J. ;
Smith, David B. ;
Langley, Ruth E. ;
Verma, Monica ;
Weeden, Simon ;
Chua, Yu Jo .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 355 (01) :11-20
[7]   FDG-PET nodal staging does not correlate with histopathological nodal stage for oesophageal cancers [J].
Devadas, M. ;
Mittal, A. ;
Lin, M. ;
Cosman, P. ;
Ziazaris, W. ;
Wilson, R. ;
Das, A. ;
Merrett, N. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 20 :113-117
[8]   Predictors of Lymph Node Metastasis in Surgically Resected T1 Esophageal Cancer [J].
Dubecz, Attila ;
Kern, Marcus ;
Solymosi, Norbert ;
Schweigert, Michael ;
Stein, Hubert J. .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2015, 99 (06) :1879-1886
[9]   The analysis of factors affecting the threshold on repeated 18F-FDG-PET/CT investigations measured by the PERCIST protocol in patients with esophageal carcinoma [J].
Fencl, Pavel ;
Belohlavek, Otakar ;
Harustiak, Tomas ;
Zemanova, Milada .
NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2012, 33 (11) :1188-1194
[10]   N-staging of oesophageal and junctional carcinoma: Is there still a role for EUS in patients staged N0 at PET/CT? [J].
Foley, K. G. ;
Lewis, W. G. ;
Fielding, P. ;
Karran, A. ;
Chan, D. ;
Blake, P. ;
Roberts, S. A. .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2014, 69 (09) :959-964