Robust diagnosis of discrete event systems against intermittent loss of observations

被引:106
作者
Carvalho, Lilian K. [1 ]
Basilio, Joao C. [1 ]
Moreira, Marcos V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, COPPE Programa Engn Eletr, BR-21949900 Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
关键词
Discrete event systems; Fault diagnosis; Robust diagnosability; Automaton; POLYNOMIAL-TIME VERIFICATION; FAILURE DIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.automatica.2012.06.042
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In the usual approaches to fault diagnosis of discrete event systems it is assumed that not only all sensors work properly but also all information reported by sensors always reaches the diagnoser. Any bad sensor operation or communication failure between sensors and the diagnoser can be regarded as loss of observations of events initially assumed as observable. In such situations, it may be possible that either the diagnoser stands still or report some wrong information regarding the fault occurrence. In this paper we assume that intermittent loss of observations may occur and we propose an automaton model based on a new language operation (language dilation) that takes it into account. We refer to this problem as robust diagnosability against intermittent loss of observations (or simply robust diagnosability, where the context allows). We present a necessary and sufficient condition for robust diagnosability in terms of the language generated by the original automaton and propose two tests for robust language diagnosability, one that deploys diagnosers and another one that uses verifiers. We also extend the results to robust codiagnosability against intermittent loss of observations. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2068 / 2078
页数:11
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Maximum Likelihood Failure Diagnosis in Finite State Machines Under Unreliable Observations [J].
Athanasopoulou, Eleftheria ;
Li, Lingxi ;
Hadjicostis, Christoforos N. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2010, 55 (03) :579-593
[2]  
Basil io J. C., 2012, DISCRETE EVENT DYNAM
[3]   Robust codiagnosability of discrete event systems [J].
Basilio, Joao Carlos ;
Lafortune, Stephane .
2009 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-9, 2009, :2202-+
[4]  
Carvalho L. K., 2010, 10 INT WORKSH DISCR, P94
[5]  
Cassandras C. G., 2008, INTRO DISCRETE EVENT
[6]   Diagnosability of discrete event systems with modular structure [J].
Contant, O ;
Lafortune, S ;
Teneketzis, D .
DISCRETE EVENT DYNAMIC SYSTEMS-THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 2006, 16 (01) :9-37
[7]   Coordinated decentralized protocols for failure diagnosis of discrete event systems [J].
Debouk, R ;
Lafortune, S ;
Teneketzis, D .
DISCRETE EVENT DYNAMIC SYSTEMS-THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 2000, 10 (1-2) :33-86
[8]  
Feng Lin, 1994, Discrete Event Dynamic Systems: Theory & Applications, V4, P197, DOI 10.1007/BF01441211
[9]   A polynomial algorithm for testing diagnosability of discrete-event systems [J].
Jiang, SB ;
Huang, ZD ;
Chandra, V ;
Kumar, R .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2001, 46 (08) :1318-1321
[10]   Inference-Based Ambiguity Management in Decentralized Decision-Making: Decentralized Diagnosis of Discrete-Event Systems [J].
Kumar, Ratnesh ;
Takai, Shigemasa .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATION SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2009, 6 (03) :479-491