Relationships Among Study Guide Format, Academic Motivation, Self-Efficacy, and Student Grades

被引:3
作者
Shane-Simpson, Christina [1 ]
Desens, Emma [1 ]
Kleutsch, Allisyn [2 ]
Obeid, Rita [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin Stout, Menomonie, WI USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin Eau Claire, Menomonie, WI USA
[3] Case Western Reserve Univ, Cleveland, OH USA
关键词
study guide; motivation; self-efficacy; academic achievement; COLLEGE-STUDENTS; STRATEGIES; STRESS;
D O I
10.1177/00986283221134594
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background: Limited research has compared relationships among student characteristics, study guide format, and academic performance. Objective: This study investigated relations among student characteristics (motivation, self-efficacy) and academic performance, examined the efficacy of study guide format on performance, and aggregated student recommendations for improving study guides. Method: Data was collected from three sections of a Child Psychology course (93 students) via a pre-survey, post-survey, and four exams. Students were assigned one study guide for each exam: instructor-created, student-created, class-created, or small group. Results: Students' self-efficacy predicted exam and final course performance. Most exam performance did not vary by guide format. However, students who used the small group and student-created guides performed better on Exam 2. Students reported wanting more instructor support on study guide creation. Conclusion: Student characteristics such as self-efficacy can predict academic performance, but additional research is needed to disentangle relationships between study guide format and performance. Teaching Implications: Educators should intentionally support students' self-efficacy throughout the semester. Given that students may prefer less effective study formats, lessons on effective study habits should be integrated into coursework.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 38
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   SELF-EFFICACY - TOWARD A UNIFYING THEORY OF BEHAVIORAL CHANGE [J].
BANDURA, A .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1977, 84 (02) :191-215
[2]   Increasing Academic Self-Efficacy in Statistics With a Live Vicarious Experience Presentation [J].
Bartsch, Robert A. ;
Case, Kim A. ;
Meerman, Heather .
TEACHING OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 39 (02) :133-136
[3]  
CETIN B., 2015, Journal of International Education Research (JIER), V11, P95, DOI DOI 10.19030/JIER.V11I2.9190
[4]   Comparing Student-Created to Teacher-Created Study Guides Within An Interteaching Framework [J].
Contreras, Bethany P. ;
Dovgan, Kristen ;
Johnson, Katherine ;
Kahng, SungWoo .
TEACHING OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 48 (04) :287-292
[5]   "What's on the Test?": The Impact of Giving Students a Concept-List Study Guide [J].
Cushen, Patrick J. ;
Hackathorn, Jana ;
Brown, Maria D. Vazquez ;
Rife, Sean C. ;
Joyce, Amanda W. ;
Smith, Eric D. ;
Bordieri, Michael J. ;
Anderson, Paul W. ;
Karlsson, Marie E. ;
Daniels, Jordan .
TEACHING OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 46 (02) :109-114
[6]   G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences [J].
Faul, Franz ;
Erdfelder, Edgar ;
Lang, Albert-Georg ;
Buchner, Axel .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2007, 39 (02) :175-191
[7]   Science Motivation Questionnaire: Construct Validation With Nonscience Majors [J].
Glynn, Shawn M. ;
Taasoobshirazi, Gita ;
Brickman, Peggy .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, 2009, 46 (02) :127-146
[8]   Pedagogical aids and student performance [J].
Gurung, RAR .
TEACHING OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 30 (02) :92-95
[9]  
Hackathorn J., 2018, ESSAYS EXCELLENCE TE, V17
[10]   Rethinking achievement goals: When are they adaptive for college students and why? [J].
Harackiewicz, JM ;
Barron, KE ;
Elliot, AJ .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, 1998, 33 (01) :1-21