The role of charging technologies in upscaling the use of electric buses in public transport: Experiences from demonstration projects

被引:30
作者
Xylia, Maria [1 ,2 ]
Silveira, Semida [1 ]
机构
[1] KTH Royal Inst Technol, Energy & Climate Studies Unit, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] KTH Royal Inst Technol, Integrated Transport Res Lab, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Charging technology; Electric bus; Public transport; Survey; Thematic analysis; Charging infrastructure; FUEL-CELL HYBRID; PLUG-IN; ENERGY; COST; EFFICIENCY; EMISSIONS; GAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.tra.2018.09.011
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Electrification of public bus transport services is currently being explored in various demonstration projects around the world. The objective of this paper is to (i) gather insights from electric bus demonstration projects with a focus on charging technologies (conductive, inductive) and strategies (slow, fast); and explore the role these factors may play as upscaling of electric bus deployment is considered. The focus is on the Nordic region. A survey with stakeholders involved with electric bus demonstration projects is performed for understanding the benefits and drawbacks of each solution, and identifying the main themes emerging from project implementation and upscaling. Advantages of the conductive charging include the maturity of the technology and its higher maximum charging power compared to currently available inductive alternatives. On the other hand, inductive technology entails other benefits, such as the lack of moving parts which could reduce the maintenance costs for infrastructure, as well as minimal visibility of the equipment. The main issues likely to impact the upscaling of electric bus use are related to the maturity, cost-effectiveness, compatibility, and charging efficiency of the available technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:399 / 415
页数:17
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] ABB, 2016, EBUS CHARG
  • [2] ABB, 2017, EV CHARG INFR ABB GL
  • [3] Aldenius M, 2016, 201612 K2
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2014, Official Journal of the European Union, V12, P1
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2012, EL VEH C IEVC 2012 I
  • [6] Bangtsson H, 2015, COST ANAL ELECT LAND
  • [7] Benz M, 2015, TECHVIEW REPORT ELEC
  • [8] Integrated Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Cost Model for Comparing Plug-in versus Wireless Charging for an Electric Bus System
    Bi, Zicheng
    De Kleine, Robert
    Keoleian, Gregory A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2017, 21 (02) : 344 - 355
  • [9] Plug-in vs. wireless charging: Life cycle energy and greenhouse gas emissions for an electric bus system
    Bi, Zicheng
    Song, Lingjun
    De Kleine, Robert
    Mi, Chunting Chris
    Keoleian, Gregory A.
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 146 : 11 - 19
  • [10] Bombardier, 2016, PRIM E BUS