Life cycle and emergy based design of energy systems in developing countries: Centralized and localized options

被引:32
作者
Kursun, Berrin [1 ]
Bakshi, Bhavik R. [2 ]
Mahata, Manoj [3 ]
Martin, Jay F. [4 ]
机构
[1] Marmara Univ Goztepe, Dept Chem Engn, TR-34722 Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Ohio State Univ, William G Lowrie Dept Chem & Biomol Engn, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[3] Dev Alternat, New Delhi 110016, India
[4] Ohio State Univ, Dept Food Agr & Biol Engn, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
Energy technologies; Developing countries; Renewable energy; Clean coal; Life cycle assessment; Emergy; ELECTRICITY-GENERATION; CLIMATE-CHANGE; POWER; ADOPTION; FINLAND; LCA;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.03.006
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
This study analyzes the environmental performance of two centralized clean coal technologies and localized biogas digester, biomass gasifier and a solar PV by joint use of life cycle assessment (LCA) and emergy analysis. We also calculate cost of electricity generation by each of these technologies. The resulting information is utilized to determine the optimum energy mix to meet the energy demand in Rampura Village, Uttar Pradesh, India by solving a linear programming (LP) problem. The LP problem is processed in two steps: first, it is solved for four scenarios involving different practical situations and constraints. After determining the suitable scenario, the optimum energy combination within this scenario is found. The scenario and energy combination analyses reveal that performing 70% of cooking by biogas cook stoves, 30% by improved biomass cook stoves in the traditional way, and converting rest of biogas to electricity to meet irrigation and lighting energy needs is the most environmentally benign, economically feasible and socially attractive option for the village. Direct utilization of biogas for cooking makes it possible to meet all the energy demand in Rampura with local resources. Importing energy from erratic and unreliable government grid is not needed, hence energy security and reliability are ensured. Additionally, the GHG and other emissions related to cooking with inefficient stoves are also significantly mitigated (88%) through the use of biogas and improved biomass cook stoves. Energy projection through 2031 to determine changing energy patterns in the project site shows that there will be enough biogas for cooking needs in Rampura until 2031. However, by 2016, the total energy demand (cooking + irrigation + lighting) will exceed what can be met with only biogas. Then either biogas potential will need to increase or electricity will have to come from biomass or solar resources. If these local sources of energy are not enough, importing energy from centralized energy options will be necessary. Thus, increasing energy demand in developing countries will necessitate utilization of centralized energy options even in rural areas. Utilizing centralized clean coal technologies to meet this demand could ease energy related environmental problems. Alternatively, if rural development can take place without rampant consumerism and energy-intensive lifestyles, then satisfying local needs with local resources with minimum environmental impact is much more likely. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 53
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Towards a better understanding of energy systems using emergy-based exergoeconoenvironmental analysis
    Aghbashlo, Mortaza
    Rosen, Marc A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EXERGY, 2019, 28 (03) : 209 - 228
  • [32] Optimal Design and Sizing of Integrated Centralized and Decentralized Energy Systems
    Liu, Wen Hui
    Alwi, Sharifah Rafidah Wan
    Hashim, Haslenda
    Muis, Zarina A.
    Klemes, Jiri J.
    Rozali, Nor Erniza M.
    Lim, Jeng Shiun
    Ho, Wai Shin
    8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED ENERGY (ICAE2016), 2017, 105 : 3733 - 3740
  • [33] Life cycle energy and environmental benefits of novel design-for-deconstruction structural systems in steel buildings
    Eckelman, Matthew J.
    Brown, Clayton
    Troup, Lucas N.
    Wang, Lizhong
    Webster, Mark D.
    Hajjar, Jerome F.
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 143 : 421 - 430
  • [34] Identifying cost-optimal options for a typical residential nearly zero energy building’s design in developing countries
    Gholamreza Heravi
    Mohammad Mahdi Salehi
    Milad Rostami
    Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2020, 22 : 2107 - 2128
  • [35] Plant Refurbishment Options Based on the Life Cycle Assessment
    Tomlinson, Stuart
    Wang, Chang J.
    Morgan, Colin
    E-ENGINEERING & DIGITAL ENTERPRISE TECHNOLOGY VII, PTS 1 AND 2, 2009, 16-19 : 1091 - 1095
  • [36] Assessment of energy recovery potential and analysis of environmental impacts of waste to energy options using life cycle assessment
    Kumar, Atul
    Samadder, Sukha Ranjan
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 365
  • [37] A simplified method for optimal design of solar water heating systems based on life-cycle energy analysis
    Yan, Chengchu
    Wang, Shengwei
    Ma, Zhenjun
    Shi, Wenxing
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2015, 74 : 271 - 278
  • [38] Emergy evaluation vs. life cycle-based embodied energy (solar, tidal and geothermal) of wood biomass resources
    Neri, E.
    Rugani, B.
    Benetto, E.
    Bastianoni, S.
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2014, 36 : 419 - 430
  • [39] Developing a procedure for the integration of Life Cycle Assessment and Emergy Accounting approaches. The Amalfi paper case study
    Santagata, Remo
    Zucaro, Amalia
    Fiorentino, Gabriella
    Lucagnano, Elisa
    Ulgiati, Sergio
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2020, 117
  • [40] Life cycle optimization of building energy systems
    Osman, Ayat
    Norman, Bryan A.
    Ries, Robert
    ENGINEERING OPTIMIZATION, 2008, 40 (02) : 157 - 178