Three-Dimensional Quantification of Glenoid Bone Loss in Anterior Shoulder Instability: The Anatomic Concave Surface Area Method

被引:5
作者
Launay, Marine [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Choudhry, Muhammad Naghman [1 ,3 ]
Green, Nicholas [1 ,3 ]
Maharaj, Jashint [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Cutbush, Kenneth [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Pivonka, Peter [1 ,3 ]
Gupta, Ashish [1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] QLD Res Inst, Shoulder Surg, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[2] Queensland Univ Technol, Queensland Unit Adv Shoulder Res, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Brisbane Private Hosp, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[4] Univ Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[5] Greenslopes Private Hosp, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
shoulder; instability; glenoid labrum; imaging; computed tomography; Bankart repair; Latarjet procedure; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; HUMERAL HEAD; BANKART REPAIR; RELIABILITY; RIM; RECONSTRUCTIONS; DISLOCATION; LESIONS; MOTION; DEFECT;
D O I
10.1177/23259671211011058
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Recurrent shoulder instability may be associated with glenoid erosion and bone loss. Accurate quantification of bone loss significantly influences the contemplation of surgical procedure. In addition, assessment of bone loss is crucial for surgical planning and accurate graft placement during surgery. Purpose: To quantify the concave surface area of glenoid bone loss by using 3-dimensional (3D) segmented models of the scapula and to compare this method with the best-fit circle and glenoid height/width methods, which use the glenoid rim for bone loss estimations. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: A total of 36 consecutive preoperative bilateral computed tomography scans of patients eligible for a primary Latarjet procedure were selected from our institutional surgical database (mean patient age, 29 9 years; 31 men and 5 women). The 3D models of both scapulae were generated using medical segmentation software and were used to map the anatomic concave surface area (ACSA) of the inferior glenoid using the diameter of the best-fit circle of the healthy glenoid. Bone loss was calculated as a ratio of the difference between surface areas of both glenoids (healthy and pathological) against the anatomic circular surface area of the healthy glenoid (the ACSA method). These results were compared with bone loss calculations using the best-fit circle and glenoid height/width methods. Inter- and intraobserver reliability were also calculated. Results: The mean (+/- SD) bone loss calculated using the ACSA, the best-fit circle, and glenoid height/width methods was 9.4% +/- 6.7%, 14.3% +/- 6.8%, and 17.6% +/- 7.3%, respectively. The ACSA method showed excellent interobserver reliability, with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.95 versus those for the best-fit circle (ICC, 0.71) and glenoid height/width (ICC, 0.79) methods. Conclusion: Quantification of instability-related glenoid bone loss is reliable using the 3D ACSA method.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   An alternative technique for the exact sizing of glenoid bone defects [J].
Auffarth, Alexander ;
Matis, Nicholas ;
Koller, Heiko ;
Resch, Herbert .
CLINICAL IMAGING, 2012, 36 (05) :574-576
[2]  
Baudi P, 2005, Chir Organi Mov, V90, P145
[3]   Glenoid Diameter Is an Inaccurate Method for Percent Glenoid Bone Loss Quantification: Analysis and Techniques for Improved Accuracy [J].
Bhatia, Sanjeev ;
Saigal, Anil ;
Frank, Rachel M. ;
Bach, Bernard R., Jr. ;
Cole, Brian J. ;
Romeo, Anthony A. ;
Verma, Nikhil N. .
ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2015, 31 (04) :608-U265
[4]   Glenoid rim lesions associated with recurrent anterior dislocation of the shoulder [J].
Bigliani, LU ;
Newton, PM ;
Steinmann, SP ;
Conner, PM ;
McIlveen, SJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1998, 26 (01) :41-45
[5]   Quantifying glenoid bone loss arthroscopically in shoulder instability [J].
Burkhart, SS ;
DeBeer, JF ;
Tehrany, AM ;
Parten, PM .
ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2002, 18 (05) :488-491
[6]   Use of preoperative three-dimensional computed tomography to quantify glenoid bone loss in shoulder instability [J].
Chuang, Tai-Yuan ;
Adams, Christopher R. ;
Burkhart, Stephen S. .
ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2008, 24 (04) :376-382
[7]   Glenoid size, inclination, and version: An anatomic study [J].
Churchill, RS ;
Brems, JJ ;
Kotschi, H .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2001, 10 (04) :327-332
[8]   About the variability of the shape of the glenoid cavity [J].
De Wilde, LF ;
Berghs, BM ;
Audenaert, E ;
Sys, G ;
Van Maele, GO ;
Barbaix, E .
SURGICAL AND RADIOLOGIC ANATOMY, 2004, 26 (01) :54-59
[9]   Management of humeral head deficiencies and glenoid track [J].
Di Giacomo G. ;
De Vita A. ;
Costantini A. ;
De Gasperis N. ;
Scarso P. .
Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, 2014, 7 (1) :6-11
[10]   Estimating Glenoid Width for Instability-Related Bone Loss: A CT Evaluation of an MRI Formula [J].
Giles, Joshua W. ;
Owens, Brett D. ;
Athwal, George S. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2015, 43 (07) :1726-1730