What Readers Have and Do: Effects of Students' Verbal Ability and Reading Time Components on Comprehension With and Without Text Availability

被引:52
作者
Schroeder, Sascha [1 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Human Dev, Ctr Educ Res, Berlin, Germany
关键词
reading comprehension; reading time components; verbal ability; ADULT AGE-DIFFERENCES; RESOURCE-ALLOCATION; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; WORKING-MEMORY; SITUATION MODELS; PARAGRAPH COMPREHENSION; CONCEPTUAL INTEGRATION; STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS; EXPOSITORY TEXT; NARRATIVE TEXT;
D O I
10.1037/a0023731
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
This study investigated the reading behavior of 15-year-old students while reading texts and answering corresponding multiple-choice questions. The availability of the texts during question answering was manipulated experimentally. Allocation of resources to several cognitive processes at the word, sentence, and text level was measured by decomposing word-by-word reading times in mixed-model analyses. Results showed that resource allocation was systematically related to measures of verbal ability and test performance. Students with higher verbal ability and better comprehension encoded infrequent concepts more carefully, spent more time on conceptual integration, and updated their situation model more carefully. In addition, reading time components associated with high-level integration processing proved more important when students were unable to reread the texts during question answering. This finding provides support for the claim that test performance without text availability is more sensitive to the quality of the mental representation that readers form online while reading.
引用
收藏
页码:877 / 896
页数:20
相关论文
共 91 条
[41]   Reading comprehension tests vary in the skills they assess: Differential dependence on decoding and oral comprehension [J].
Keenan, Janice M. ;
Betjemann, Rebecca S. ;
Olson, Richard K. .
SCIENTIFIC STUDIES OF READING, 2008, 12 (03) :281-300
[42]   Comprehending the gray oral reading test without reading it: Why comprehension tests should not include passage-independent items [J].
Keenan, Janice M. ;
Betjemann, Rebecca S. .
SCIENTIFIC STUDIES OF READING, 2006, 10 (04) :363-380
[43]  
Kintsch W., 1998, Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition
[44]   Tracking the mind during reading: The influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations [J].
Kliegl, R ;
Nuthmann, A ;
Engbert, R .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2006, 135 (01) :12-35
[45]   REGRESSION-ANALYSES OF REPEATED MEASURES DATA IN COGNITIVE RESEARCH [J].
LORCH, RF ;
MYERS, JL .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1990, 16 (01) :149-157
[46]  
Magliano J.P., 2007, Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies, P107
[47]   Strategic processing during comprehension [J].
Magliano, JP ;
Trabasso, T ;
Graesser, AC .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 91 (04) :615-629
[48]   INFERENCE DURING READING [J].
MCKOON, G ;
RATCLIFF, R .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1992, 99 (03) :440-466
[49]  
McNamara D.S., 2007, Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies, P397, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203810033
[50]   iSTART: Interactive strategy training for active reading and thinking [J].
McNamara, DS ;
Levinstein, IB ;
Boonthum, C .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS INSTRUMENTS & COMPUTERS, 2004, 36 (02) :222-233