Assessing the Value of Information for long-term structural health monitoring

被引:73
作者
Pozzi, Matteo [1 ]
Kiureghian, Armen Der [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
来源
HEALTH MONITORING OF STRUCTURAL AND BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS 2011 | 2011年 / 7984卷
关键词
Decision-making; Long-term monitoring system; Loss function; Value of Information; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1117/12.881918
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In the field of Structural Health Monitoring, tests and sensing systems are intended as tools providing diagnoses, which allow the operator of the facility to develop an efficient maintenance plan or to require extraordinary measures on a structure. The effectiveness of these systems depends directly on their capability to guide towards the most optimal decision for the prevailing circumstances, avoiding mistakes and wastes of resources. Though this is well known, most studies only address the accuracy of the information gained from sensors without discussing economic criteria. Other studies evaluate these criteria separately, with only marginal or heuristic connection with the outcomes of the monitoring system. The concept of "Value of Information" (VoI) provides a rational basis to rank measuring systems according to a utility-based metric, which fully includes the decision-making process affected by the monitoring campaign. This framework allows, for example, an explicit assessment of the economical justifiability of adopting a sensor depending on its precision. In this paper we outline the framework for assessing the VoI, as applicable to the ranking of competitive measuring systems. We present the basic concepts involved, highlight issues related to monitoring of civil structures, address the problem of non-linearity of the cost-to-utility mapping, and introduce an approximate Monte Carlo approach suitable for the implementation of time-consuming predictive models.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1991, Do the Right Thing: Studies in Limited Rationality
[2]  
Ben-Haim Y., 2006, INFOGAP THEORY DECIS
[3]   A method-based survey of life cycle costing literature pertinent to infrastructure design and renewal [J].
Christensen, PN ;
Sparks, GA ;
Kostuk, KJ .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2005, 32 (01) :250-259
[4]   Optimal maintenance and repair policies in infrastructure management under uncertain facility deterioration rates: an adaptive control approach [J].
Durango, PL ;
Madanat, SM .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2002, 36 (09) :763-778
[5]   INFORMATION VALUE THEORY [J].
HOWARD, RA .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS SCIENCE AND CYBERNETICS, 1966, SSC2 (01) :22-&
[6]  
Jensen F.V., 2007, Bayesian networks and decision graphs, V2nd
[7]   AN APPLICATION OF VALUE-OF-INFORMATION TO DECISION PROCESS REENGINEERING [J].
Keisler, Jeffrey M. ;
Brodfuehrer, Mark .
ENGINEERING ECONOMIST, 2009, 54 (03) :197-221
[8]   Optimal planning of structural performance monitoring based on reliability importance assessment [J].
Kim, Sunyong ;
Frangopol, Dan M. .
PROBABILISTIC ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 2010, 25 (01) :86-98
[9]   Optimal Value of Information in Graphical Models [J].
Krause, Andreas ;
Guestrin, Carlos .
JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE RESEARCH, 2009, 35 :557-591
[10]  
MacKay D.J., 2003, Information Theory, Inference and Learning Algorithms