Identifying Prognostic Markers From Clinical, Radiomics, and Deep Learning Imaging Features for Gastric Cancer Survival Prediction

被引:14
作者
Hao, Degan [1 ]
Li, Qiong [2 ]
Feng, Qiu-Xia [2 ]
Qi, Liang [2 ]
Liu, Xi-Sheng [2 ]
Arefan, Dooman [3 ]
Zhang, Yu-Dong [2 ]
Wu, Shandong [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Intelligent Syst Program, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[2] Nanjing Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Radiol, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Radiol, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Biomed Informat, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[5] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Bioengn, Pittsburgh, PA USA
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2022年 / 11卷
关键词
gastric cancer; survival analysis (source; MeSH NLM); multi-modal data analysis; radiomics; deep learning; CNN; 8TH EDITION; VALIDATION; SYSTEM; MODELS;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2021.725889
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundGastric cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer death in the world. Improving gastric cancer survival prediction can enhance patient prognostication and treatment planning. MethodsIn this study, we performed gastric cancer survival prediction using machine learning and multi-modal data of 1061 patients, including 743 for model learning and 318 independent patients for evaluation. A Cox proportional-hazard model was trained to integrate clinical variables and CT imaging features (extracted by radiomics and deep learning) for overall and progression-free survival prediction. We further analyzed the prediction effects of clinical, radiomics, and deep learning features. Concordance index (c-index) was used as the model performance metric, and the predictive effects of multi-modal features were measured by hazard ratios (HRs) at pre- and post-operative settings. ResultsAmong 318 patients in the independent testing group, the hazard predicted by Cox from multi-modal features is associated with their survival. The highest c-index was 0.783 (95% CI, 0.782-0.783) and 0.770 (95% CI, 0.769-0.771) for overall and progression-free survival prediction, respectively. The post-operative variables are significantly (p<0.001) more predictive than the pre-operative variables. Pathological tumor stage (HR=1.336 [overall survival]/1.768 [progression-free survival], p<0.005), pathological lymph node stage (HR=1.665/1.433, p<0.005), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) (HR=1.632/1.522, p=0.02), chemotherapy treatment (HR=0.254/0.287, p<0.005), radiomics signature [HR=1.540/1.310, p<0.005], and deep learning signature [HR=1.950/1.420, p<0.005]) are significant survival predictors. ConclusionOur study showed that CT radiomics and deep learning imaging features are significant pre-operative predictors, providing additional prognostic information to the pathological staging markers. Lower CEA levels and chemotherapy treatments also increase survival chances. These findings can enhance gastric cancer patient prognostication and inform treatment planning.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Adachi Y, 2000, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V89, P1418
[2]  
Ajani J A., 2015, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: gastric cancer (version 1.2015)
[3]   Prognostic Significance of Perineural Invasion in Patients with Gastric Cancer Who Underwent Curative Resection [J].
Bilici, Ahmet ;
Seker, Mesut ;
Ustaalioglu, Bala Basak Oven ;
Kefeli, Umut ;
Yildirim, Emre ;
Yavuzer, Dilek ;
Aydin, Fatih Muhammed ;
Salepci, Taflan ;
Oncel, Mustafa ;
Gumus, Mahmut .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 17 (08) :2037-2044
[4]  
Breiman L., 2001, Machine Learning, V45, P5
[5]   The roles of CT and EUS in the preoperative evaluation of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors larger than 2cm [J].
Chen, Tao ;
Xu, Lili ;
Dong, Xiaoyu ;
Li, Yue ;
Yu, Jiang ;
Xiong, Wei ;
Li, Guoxin .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (05) :2481-2489
[6]   Cancer Statistics in China, 2015 [J].
Chen, Wanqing ;
Zheng, Rongshou ;
Baade, Peter D. ;
Zhang, Siwei ;
Zeng, Hongmei ;
Bray, Freddie ;
Jemal, Ahmedin ;
Yu, Xue Qin ;
He, Jie .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2016, 66 (02) :115-132
[7]  
COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187
[8]  
Dekking F.M., 2005, A Modern Introduction to Probability and Statistics: Understanding why and how
[9]  
Harrell FE, 1996, STAT MED, V15, P361, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960229)15:4<361::AID-SIM168>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-4