Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio as a predictive factor of complete pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer

被引:54
|
作者
Cuello-Lopez, Javier [1 ]
Fidalgo-Zapata, Ana [2 ]
Lopez-Agudelo, Laura [3 ]
Vasquez-Trespalacios, Elsa [4 ]
机构
[1] Fdn Colombiana Cancerol Clin Vida, Clin Oncol Grp, Medellin, Colombia
[2] CES Univ, Sch Med, Breast Surgeon Fellowship Program, Medellin, Colombia
[3] Fdn Colombiana Cancerol Clin Vida, Medellin, Colombia
[4] CES Univ, Sch Med, Dept Clin Epidemiol, Medellin, Colombia
来源
PLOS ONE | 2018年 / 13卷 / 11期
关键词
TUMOR-INFILTRATING LYMPHOCYTES; NEUTROPHIL/LYMPHOCYTE RATIO; FREE SURVIVAL; CONSENSUS; THERAPY; IMPACT; FUTURE;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0207224
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients is of prognostic value in determining short- and mid-term outcomes. Inflammatory biomarkers, such as platelet-tolymphocyte ratio (PLR) and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), have been proposed as predictive factors of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Currently, there are no studies in Colombian patients reporting the role of inflammatory biomarkers as response predictors in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Therefore, in this study we performed a cross-sectional study and analyzed the association between inflammatory biomarkers and pCR (pathological complete response) in patients diagnosed with breast cancer-of different molecular subtypes- and treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A total of 288 patients were included in the study, with a median age of 51 years old. Disease was locally advanced in 83% of the participants, and 77.7% had compromised lymph nodes. In our cohort, the most frequent tumor molecular subtype was luminal B/Her2- (27.8%) followed by triple negative [TN] (21.5%), luminal B/Her2+ (19.8%), Her2-enriched (16%) and luminal A (13.5%). PLR was not associated with age, menopausal status, baseline tumor size, histologic grade, axillary lymph node involvement, disease stage, estrogen receptor status, or Ki67; however, complete pathological response was significantly higher in the low PLR group (PLR<150) compared with the high PLR group (35.1% Vs. 22.2%, p = 0.03). In addition, Her2-enriched tumors achieved the highest pCR rates (65%), followed by TN (34%) tumors. Our results suggest that breast cancer patients with low platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR <150), treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy achieve higher complete pathological response, independently of primary tumor molecular subtype.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Usefulness of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in hormone-receptor-negative breast cancer
    Liu, Chao
    Huang, Zhou
    Wang, Qiusheng
    Sun, Bing
    Ding, Lijuan
    Meng, Xiangying
    Wu, Shikai
    ONCOTARGETS AND THERAPY, 2016, 9 : 4653 - 4660
  • [42] Nomogram-derived prediction of pathologic complete response (pCR) in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT)
    Pu, Shengyu
    Wang, Ke
    Liu, Yang
    Liao, Xiaoqin
    Chen, Heyan
    He, Jianjun
    Zhang, Jian
    BMC CANCER, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [43] Relationship between Complete Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Survival in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Hatzis, Christos
    Symmans, W. Fraser
    Zhang, Ya
    Gould, Rebekah E.
    Moulder, Stacy L.
    Hunt, Kelly K.
    Abu-Khalaf, Maysa
    Hofstatter, Erin W.
    Lannin, Donald
    Chagpar, Anees B.
    Pusztai, Lajos
    CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2016, 22 (01) : 26 - 33
  • [44] Anthracycline-Free Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Ensures Higher Rates of Pathologic Complete Response in Breast Cancer
    De Iuliis, Francesca
    Salerno, Gerardo
    Corvino, Raffaella
    D'Aniello, Debora
    Cefali, Katia
    Taglieri, Ludovica
    Lanza, Rosina
    Scarpa, Susanna
    CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2017, 17 (01) : 34 - 40
  • [45] Effective factors to raise diagnostic performance of breast MRI for diagnosing pathologic complete response in breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
    Choi, Bo Bae
    Kim, Sung Hun
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2015, 56 (07) : 790 - 797
  • [46] Discrepancy of Breast and Axillary Pathologic Complete Response and Outcomes in Different Subtypes of Node-positive Breast Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
    Chen, Shin-Cheh
    Yu, Chi-Chang
    Chang, Hsien-Kun
    Lin, Yung-Chang
    Lo, Yung-Feng
    Shen, Shih-Che
    Kuo, Wen-Lin
    Tsai, Hsiu-Pei
    Chou, Hsu-Huan
    Chu, Chia-Hui
    Shen, Wen-Chi
    Wu, Ren-Chin
    Ueng, Shir-Hwa
    Huang, Yi-Ting
    JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2021, 12 (17): : 5365 - 5374
  • [47] A comparison of complete pathologic response rates following neoadjuvant chemotherapy among South African breast cancer patients with and without concurrent HIV infection
    Nietz, Sarah
    O'Neil, Daniel S.
    Ayeni, Oluwatosin
    Chen, Wenlong Carl
    Joffe, Maureen
    Jacobson, Judith S.
    Neugut, Alfred, I
    Ruff, Paul
    Mapanga, Witness
    Buccimazza, Ines
    Singh, Urishka
    Cacala, Sharon
    Stopforth, Laura
    Phakathi, Boitumelo
    Chirwa, Tobias
    Cubasch, Herbert
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2020, 184 (03) : 861 - 872
  • [48] The prognostic value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in nasopharyngeal cancer
    Gundog, Mete
    Basaran, Hatice
    JOURNAL OF BUON, 2020, 25 (01): : 367 - 375
  • [49] The elevated preoperative platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts poor prognosis in breast cancer patients
    Krenn-Pilko, S.
    Langsenlehner, U.
    Thurner, E-M
    Stojakovic, T.
    Pichler, M.
    Gerger, A.
    Kapp, K. S.
    Langsenlehner, T.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2014, 110 (10) : 2524 - 2530
  • [50] Association of Tumor Molecular Subtype and Stage with Breast and Axillary Pathologic Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer
    Myers, Sara P.
    Ahrendt, Gillian M.
    Lee, Joanna S.
    Steiman, Jennifer G.
    Soran, Atilla
    Johnson, Ronald R.
    McAuliffe, Priscilla F.
    Diego, Emilia J.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 28 (13) : 8636 - 8642