Prophylactic negative pressure wound dressings reduces wound complications following emergency laparotomies: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:8
|
作者
Lakhani, Amar [1 ]
Jamel, Wael [1 ,2 ]
Riddiough, Georgina E. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Cabalag, Carlos S. [2 ,5 ]
Stevens, Sean [2 ,3 ,5 ]
Liu, David S. [2 ,3 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Northern Hlth, Epping, Vic, Australia
[2] Austin Hlth, Div Surg Anaesthesia & Procedural Med, Heidelberg, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Dept Surg, Austin Hlth, Heidelberg, Vic, Australia
[4] Univ Melbourne, Peter Doherty Inst Infect & Immun, Dept Infect Dis, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] Univ Melbourne, Dept Surg, Austin Hlth, Gen & Gastrointestinal Surg Res Grp, Heidelberg, Vic, Australia
[6] Peter MacCallum Canc Ctr, Div Canc Surg, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
SURGICAL SITE INFECTION; ABDOMINAL-SURGERY; INCISIONS; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.surg.2022.05.020
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Wound complications are a common cause of postoperative morbidity and incur significant healthcare costs. Recent studies have shown that negative pressure wound dressings reduce wound complication rates, particularly surgical site infections, after elective laparotomies. The clinical utility of prophylactic negative pressure wound dressings for closed emergency laparotomy incisions remains controversial. This meta-analysis investigated the rates of wound complications after emergency lapa-rotomy when a negative pressure wound dressing was applied.Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Registry, Web of Science, and Clinialtrials.gov databases were searched from January 1, 2005, to April 1, 2022. All studies comparing negative pressure wound dressings to standard dressings on closed emergency laparotomy incisions were included.Results: A total of 1,199 (negative pressure wound dressings: 566, standard dressing: 633) patients from 7 (prospective: 4, retrospective: 3) studies were identified. Overall, the surgical site infection (superficial/ deep) rate was 13.6% (77/566) vs 25.1% (159/633) in the negative pressure wound dressing versus standard dressing groups, respectively (odds ratio 0.43, 95% confidence interval 0.30-0.62). Wound breakdown (skin/fascial dehiscence) was significantly lower in the negative pressure wound dressing (7.7%) group compared to the standard dressing (16.9%) group (odds ratio 0.36, 95% confidence interval 0.19-0.72). The incidence of overall wound complications was significantly lower in the negative pressure wound dressing (15.9%) group compared to the standard dressing (30.4%) group (odds ratio 0.41, 95% confidence interval 0.28-0.59). No significant differences were found in hospital length-of-stay and readmission rates.Conclusion: Prophylactic negative pressure wound dressings for closed emergency laparotomy incisions were associated with a significant reduction in surgical site infections, wound breakdown, and overall wound complications, thus supporting its clinical use.
引用
收藏
页码:949 / 954
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Negative pressure wound therapy versus conventional wound dressings in treatment of open fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liu, Xi
    Zhang, Hui
    Cen, Shiqiang
    Huang, Fuguo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 53 : 72 - 79
  • [2] Comparing the Incidence of Superficial Surgical Site Infections Following Emergency Laparotomies with the Use of Negative Pressure Wound Dressings Versus Standard Wound Dressings
    Cotter Fonseca, P.
    Vlachos, G.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 111
  • [3] Evaluation of Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Versus Standard Surgical Dressings on Wound Outcomes in Posterior Spinal Surgery Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Rathore, Ahmed
    Baliga, Santosh
    Lennox, Liam
    Bickerton, Melanie
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 111
  • [4] A commentary on 'A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing negative pressure wound therapy to conventional wound dressings in the treatment of open fractures'
    Saravanan, Muthupandian
    Ganugula, Samhita
    Arockiaraj, Jesu
    Dejene, Tsehaye A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 110 (04) : 2444 - 2445
  • [5] The Efficacy of Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Closed Incisions in Breast Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Cagney, David
    Simmons, Lydia
    O'Leary, Donal Peter
    Corrigan, Mark
    Kelly, Louise
    O'Sullivan, M. J.
    Liew, Aaron
    Redmond, Henry Paul
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 44 (05) : 1526 - 1537
  • [6] The Efficacy of Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Closed Incisions in Breast Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    David Cagney
    Lydia Simmons
    Donal Peter O’Leary
    Mark Corrigan
    Louise Kelly
    M. J. O’Sullivan
    Aaron Liew
    Henry Paul Redmond
    World Journal of Surgery, 2020, 44 : 1526 - 1537
  • [7] Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy after open ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Berner-Hansen, V.
    Oma, E.
    Willaume, M.
    Jensen, K. K.
    HERNIA, 2021, 25 (06) : 1481 - 1490
  • [8] Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Obese Women After Cesarean Delivery A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Smid, Marcela C.
    Dotters-Katz, Sarah K.
    Grace, Matthew
    Wright, Sarah T.
    Villers, Margaret S.
    Hardy-Fairbanks, Abbey
    Stamilio, David M.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 130 (05): : 969 - 978
  • [9] Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy after open ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    V. Berner-Hansen
    E. Oma
    M. Willaume
    K. K. Jensen
    Hernia, 2021, 25 : 1481 - 1490
  • [10] Open Effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy on chronic wound healing: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Burhan, Asmat
    Khusein, Nizam bin Ali
    Sebayang, Septian Mixrova
    BELITUNG NURSING JOURNAL, 2022, 8 (06) : 470 - 480