Prosodic prominence in a stressless language: An acoustic investigation of Indonesian

被引:2
作者
Athanasopoulou, Angeliki [1 ]
Vogel, Irene [2 ]
Pincus, Nadya [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Sch Languages Linguist Literatures & Cultures, Craigie Hall D310,2500 Univ Dr NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
[2] Univ Delaware, Dept Linguist, 125 E Main St, Newark, DE 19711 USA
关键词
focus; Indonesian; production; stress; stressless languages; typology; FOCUS;
D O I
10.1017/S0022226721000141
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
Although it has been proposed that all languages may have some lexical stress property, recent studies of (Standard) Indonesian have concluded, based primarily on perception, that lexical stress is not present in this language. While it is philosophically problematic to prove the non-existence of a phenomenon, we examine data from a large-scale production study for both direct and indirect evidence of stress, contributing to the growing body of literature in this field. In the first case, evidence is sought that indicates that a particular syllable in a word exhibits acoustic properties typically associated with prominence (i.e. fundamental frequency (f0), duration, intensity, vowel quality). In the second case, evidence of enhancement of these properties on a particular syllable under focus is sought, for a more abstract stress property that is not overtly manifested at the word level. Although we find no evidence of lexical prominence, we observe acoustic patterns consistent with a higher level prominence corresponding to focus, manifested by strong (Intonational Phrase) boundary properties. Overall, our findings reveal that there is strong support for a class of languages lacking lexical stress, and in the absence of a stressed syllable to enhance, focus may be manifested prosodically as boundary properties.
引用
收藏
页码:695 / 735
页数:41
相关论文
共 64 条
[21]  
Goedemans Rob., 2014, SEGMENTS, P83
[22]  
Gussenhoven C., 2004, PHONOLOGY TONE INTON, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511616983
[23]  
Halim Amran., 1974, Intonation in relation to syntax in Bahasa Indonesia
[24]  
Halim Amran., 1981, INTONATION RELATION, DOI [10.15144/PL-D36.cover, DOI 10.15144/PL-D36.COVER]
[25]  
Hulst Harryvan der., 2010, A Survey of word cccentual patterns in the languages of the world, V1, P3, DOI DOI 10.1515/9783110198966.1.3
[26]  
Hyman Larry., 2006, PHONOLOGY, V23, P225, DOI [DOI 10.1017/S0952675706000893, 10.1017/S0952675706000804]
[27]   How (not) to do phonological typology: the case of pitch-accent [J].
Hyman, Larry M. .
LANGUAGE SCIENCES, 2009, 31 (2-3) :213-238
[28]  
Jun S.-.A., 2005, PROSODIC TYPOLOGY PH, P9
[29]  
Kaland C. C. L., 2018, P 9 INT C SPEECH PRO, P339, DOI [10.21437/SpeechProsody.2018-6, DOI 10.21437/SPEECHPROSODY.2018-6]
[30]  
Ladd D.Robert., 1996, INTONATIONAL PHONOLO, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511808814