Minimal clinically important change of the neck disability index and the numerical rating scale for patients with neck pain

被引:303
作者
Pool, Jan J. M. [1 ]
Ostelo, Raymond W. J. G. [1 ,2 ]
Hoving, Jan L. [1 ,3 ]
Bouter, Lex M. [1 ]
de Vet, Henrica C. W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, EMGO Inst, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Amsterdam Sch Allied Hlth Care Educ, Dept Allied Hlth Care Res, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Monash Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Prevent Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
minimal clinically important change; neck pain; disability; pain;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815cf75b
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Prospective, single-cohort study. Objective. To assess the minimal clinically important change (MCIC) on the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for pain in patients with neck pain. Summary of Background Data. Both measurement instruments are frequently used in research and clinical practice, but which changes are clinically relevant is still unknown. Methods. The MCIC was estimated with 2 different methods, both integrating an anchor-based and distribution-based approach: the minimal detectable change (MDC) and the optimal cutoff point of the ROC curve. The study population consisted of 183 patients with nonspecific neck pain. Results. The results show an MDC of 10.5 points for the NDI (scale range, 0-50) and 4.3 points for the NRS (scale range, 0-10), and optimal cutoff points of the ROC curve of 3.5 for the NDI and 2.5 for the NRS. Conclusion. The estimated MCIC should be used as an indication for relevant changes in clinical practice. Using the optimal cutoff point of the ROC curve, false positives and false negatives are equally weighted; and if there are no objections doing so, the optimal cutoff point of the ROC curve may be a good choice.
引用
收藏
页码:3047 / 3051
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Many faces of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID): a literature review and directions for future research
    Beaton, DE
    Boers, M
    Wells, GA
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN RHEUMATOLOGY, 2002, 14 (02) : 109 - 114
  • [2] Responsiveness of functional status in low back pain: A comparison of different instruments
    Beurskens, AJHM
    deVet, HCW
    Koke, AJA
    [J]. PAIN, 1996, 65 (01) : 71 - 76
  • [3] Sensitivity and specificity of outcome measures in patients with neck pain: Detecting clinically significant improvement
    Bolton, JE
    [J]. SPINE, 2004, 29 (21) : 2410 - 2417
  • [4] Bolton JE, 1998, J MANIP PHYSIOL THER, V21, P1
  • [5] Cost-of-illness of neck pain in The Netherlands in 1996
    Borghouts, JAJ
    Koes, BW
    Vondeling, H
    Bouter, LM
    [J]. PAIN, 1999, 80 (03) : 629 - 636
  • [6] What decline in pain intensity is meaningful to patients with acute pain?
    Cepeda, MS
    Africano, JM
    Polo, R
    Alcala, R
    Carr, DB
    [J]. PAIN, 2003, 105 (1-2) : 151 - 157
  • [7] Risk factors for neck pain: a longitudinal study in the general population
    Croft, PR
    Lewis, M
    Papageorgiou, AC
    Thomas, E
    Jayson, MIV
    Macfarlane, GJ
    Silman, AJ
    [J]. PAIN, 2001, 93 (03) : 317 - 325
  • [8] Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life
    Crosby, RD
    Kolotkin, RL
    Williams, GR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 56 (05) : 395 - 407
  • [9] Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale
    Farrar, JT
    Young, JP
    LaMoreaux, L
    Werth, JL
    Poole, RM
    [J]. PAIN, 2001, 94 (02) : 149 - 158
  • [10] A comparison of a modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale
    Fritz, JM
    Irrgang, JJ
    [J]. PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2001, 81 (02): : 776 - 788