Indian women in doctoral education in science and engineering - A study of informal milieu at the reputed Indian institutes of technology

被引:22
作者
Gupta, Namrata [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol, Dept Human & Social Sci, Kanpur 208016, Uttar Pradesh, India
关键词
informal interaction; tokenism; patrifocality; gender segregation;
D O I
10.1177/0895904805303200
中图分类号
D58 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
摘要
Informal communication and interaction are integral components of the practice of science, including the doctoral process. This article argues that women are disadvantaged in the informal milieu of the higher education in science, and that this milieu is not uniform everywhere. It posits that to understand the position of women in science in South Asian countries like India, the inquiry has to be conceptualized in the specific social, historical, and institutional context. Through a questionnaire survey comparing male and female perceptions, and qualitative interviews with women, an attempt has been made to understand the nature of Indian women's problems in the informal doctoral science environment. The findings indicate that though the nature of problems appears to be similar to those faced by the women in science in the West, the specific form of biases varies, and that the cultural context molds the specific forms of discrimination. This has implications for future research and policies.
引用
收藏
页码:507 / 533
页数:27
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
*AC SEC, 2003, REG DAT ROLL LIST PO
[2]  
BASU A, 1999, INDEPENDENCE FREEDOM, P135
[3]  
Bourdieu P., 1984, Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, DOI DOI 10.1002/9780470755679.CH15
[4]   Preparing the next generation of scientists: The social process of managing students [J].
Campbell, RA .
SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, 2003, 33 (06) :897-927
[5]   Gender and science in development: Women scientists in Ghana, Kenya, and India [J].
Campion, P ;
Shrum, W .
SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES, 2004, 29 (04) :459-485
[6]  
CETINA KK, 1999, EISTEMIC CULTURES SC
[7]  
Chanana K, 2000, ECON POLIT WEEKLY, V35, P1012
[8]  
Chanana K., 2001, Sociological Bulletin, V50, P37
[9]  
Chanana K., 2001, INTERROGATING WOMENS
[10]  
CHARLESWORTH M, 1989, LIFE AMONG SCI ANTHR