The influence of information and communication technologies on public participation in urban water governance: A review of place-based research

被引:58
作者
Mukhtarov, Farhad [1 ,2 ]
Dieperink, Carel [1 ]
Driessen, Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Copernicus Inst Sustainable Dev, Princetonlaan 8a, NL-3584 CB Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Natl Univ Singapore, Inst Water Policy, 469C Bukit Timah Rd, Singapore 259772, Singapore
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Participation; Urban; Water; ICT; Deliberation; Democracy; CITIZEN OBSERVATORIES; KNOWLEDGE; LAND; TOOL; COPRODUCTION; CHALLENGES; MANAGEMENT; SUPPORT; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsci.2018.08.015
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Public participation is a central topic in urban water governance. With the spread of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT), urban water governance has undergone prominent changes, including the process and outcomes of public participation. This paper aims to systematically review existing scientific and grey literature on the use of ICT to facilitate public participation in urban water governance. Based on a search in Google Scholar, we have collected 33 published texts and discerned 32 case studies, which we analysed according to the Cochrane systematic review methodology: We found that ICT tools allow many citizens to be better informed and co-produce water services with a government. Furthermore, ICT tools have the potential to help in efficiency and effectiveness of urban water service provision. However, such tools provide few opportunities for higher modes of discussion and deliberation, and grant limited authority to participants to influence decision-making processes. This finding raises concerns about the unwarranted optimism of "digital democracy" proponents in the urban water sector. Public participation at the end of the day is political by nature, which cannot be cancelled out by ICT tools alone.
引用
收藏
页码:430 / 438
页数:9
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   Exposure, hazard and risk mapping during a flood event using open source geospatial technology [J].
Aggarwal, Arpit .
GEOMATICS NATURAL HAZARDS & RISK, 2016, 7 (04) :1426-1441
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, J FLOOD RISK MANAGEM, DOI DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12154
[3]  
[Anonymous], INT C DAT INF KNOWL
[4]   Spatial decision support for collaborative land use planning workshops [J].
Arciniegas, Gustavo ;
Janssen, Ron .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2012, 107 (03) :332-342
[5]   LADDER OF CITIZEN PARTICIPATION [J].
ARNSTEIN, SR .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PLANNERS, 1969, 35 (04) :216-224
[6]   On the use of systematic reviews to inform environmental policies [J].
Bilotta, Gary S. ;
Milner, Alice M. ;
Boyd, Ian .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2014, 42 :67-77
[7]   Citizen Science: A Developing Tool for Expanding Science Knowledge and Scientific Literacy [J].
Bonney, Rick ;
Cooper, Caren B. ;
Dickinson, Janis ;
Kelling, Steve ;
Phillips, Tina ;
Rosenberg, Kenneth V. ;
Shirk, Jennifer .
BIOSCIENCE, 2009, 59 (11) :977-984
[8]   Citizen science in hydrology and water resources: opportunities for knowledge generation, ecosystem service management, and sustainable development [J].
Buytaert, Wouter ;
Zulkafli, Zed ;
Grainger, Sam ;
Acosta, Luis ;
Alemie, Tilashwork C. ;
Bastiaensen, Johan ;
De Bievre, Bert ;
Bhusal, Jagat ;
Clare, Julian ;
Dewulf, Art ;
Foggin, Marc ;
Hannah, David M. ;
Hergarten, Christian ;
Isaeva, Aiganysh ;
Karpouzoglou, Timothy ;
Pandeya, Bhopal ;
Paudel, Deepak ;
Sharma, Keshav ;
Steenhuis, Tammo ;
Tilahun, Seifu ;
Van Hecken, Gert ;
Zhumanova, Munavar .
FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE, 2014, 2
[9]   Explaining the Failure of an Online Citizen Engagement Initiative: The Role of Internal Institutional Variables [J].
Chadwick, Andrew .
JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & POLITICS, 2011, 8 (01) :21-40
[10]   A basic guide for empirical environmental social science [J].
Cox, Michael .
ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2015, 20 (01)